Jump to content

Talk:List of birds by population

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 71.89.24.41 (talk) at 10:26, 9 September 2019. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Untitled

There reads: Lists by taxonomic order (Non-passerines)
Why "non-passerines"? There is no explanation why they're excluded. And does that mean passerines are the only order missing from the list? 85.217.38.184 (talk) 06:25, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That (Non-passerines) seems not to be there anymore. And apparently passerines are not the only one, since I counted orders from bird and got about 40, while this article has 23. So, close to 20 orders are missing. 91.154.188.185 (talk) 07:16, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 14 external links on List of birds by population. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:48, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 29 external links on List of birds by population. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:56, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


I doubt that the number of Mallard ducks listed here is accurate because it doesn't seem to include domesticated ducks, most of which are a sub-species of Mallards. I would also suggest that the example of a more common species of the order Galliformes be changed to chicken, which is vastly more common than the Willow Ptarmigan (something like 1000 times the population) 2606:A000:112A:C0ED:59CF:213A:DD22:22C7 (talk) 21:25, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This pages title is "list of birds by population." The article actually seems to contain an alphabetical list of taxonomic orders of birds, with a population estimate of two specific species per order. What's up with that? This isn't what it says it's supposed to be.