Talk:Jack Dorsey
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
A fact from Jack Dorsey appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 November 2008, and was viewed approximately 11,800 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Untitled
It may be true, but it sounds odd; a 14 year old, with an interest in developing dispatching software? There must be a bit more to it than that. Landroo (talk) 12:45, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
I am the great fan and supporter
Cosmic khanal (talk) 15:45, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
Suggestion
Hi, this page seems to be closed to edits.
Just a suggstion:
Jack has said several times in public that he attended NYU and its computer science program, though did not graduate, and went to California in 1999. All this information is left out of his Wikipedia bio; I'm just wondering why? He doesn't hide the fact that he attended NYU, nor that he left without finishing. [I have no affiliation with either NYU or Twitter] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.83.70.117 (talk) 01:56, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
User:SusanLeschSudanLesch Hello susan, i don't know exactly if Fleetic is from jack dorsey, but i see articles in Forbesmagazine with responses about this "proyect" i don't have the link, if you type in google "jack dorsey forbes magazine", you can get more info about this. Regards
its been so long but i remember u now i cant get over ur eyes there beatiful 74.195.219.77 (talk) 20:38, 1 March 2015 (UTC) 74.195.219.77 (talk) 20:38, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Another Suggestion
Doesn't this guy smoke a lot of Marijuana? Shouldn't that be noted? 76.90.115.62 (talk) 15:48, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- No, for the same reason one wouldn't mention someone smokes or drinks. Also, there would need to be reliable sources) Jeff Carr (talk) 17:07, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
Alex Jones
Dorsey has taken a stand to allow Alex Jones to exist on twitter as of today. It may be news worth, but I'm not comfortable adding something that controversial due to BLP policy. [1] [2] Jeff Carr (talk) 17:07, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
Controversies
Why isn't there a controversies section? Just Google "Jack Dorsey controversies" brings up numerous notable examples in the past few months. They should be represented here. Cody.berdinis (talk) 04:03, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- See WP:CSECTION. Such sections are generally inappropriate and to be avoided. —ADavidB 18:08, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
- You sure took another route when arguing for that Violence section on Arundel High School being a separate section. I am sure it wasn't due to any bias. Siihb (talk) 09:39, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Nonsense. Jack Dorsey is a criminal who, through his platform, aided a hostile foreign power in electing an illegitimate president. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:6000:120C:304:734D:C48A:9443:F1F8 (talk) 21:37, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Take a few moments to look around the site. Everyone playing ball with certain "sides" like Jack Dorsey/Steve Huffman etc are blocked from having controversy sections. People who aren't protected, but have identical jobs, have controvery sections, like Mark Zuckerberg for example. Leaving a few Dorsey specific links, in response to this previous talk here for those users who don't just read the first page of PR-apedia.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/twitter-ceo-retweeted-alleged-russian-trolls https://fortune.com/2017/10/22/twitter-jack-dorsey-russian-troll/ https://www.newsweek.com/twitter-jack-dorsey-trolls-bots-plan-827670 https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/social-media/trump-other-politicians-celebs-shared-boosted-russian-troll-tweets-n817036
- Biography articles of living people
- C-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Low-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- C-Class Computing articles
- Low-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- C-Class Internet articles
- Low-importance Internet articles
- WikiProject Internet articles
- C-Class St. Louis articles
- Low-importance St. Louis articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles