User talk:AngusWOOF

Archives (Index)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Joseph A. Camp

Are we about good with this awesome article -that you help tremendously on?

As you will see if you check out the Ballotpedia page, Joseph has completed all requirements for access to the 2020 General Election Ballot for the House and Senate Campaigns and he will be on the ballot in multiple states that allow him to simply pay ballot access fees.

Thanks for all that you have been doing. Hopefully the article will get published with all our work on it. ~DenverNativ (Not signed in).

I'm still looking for articles that focus on his notability outside the state. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:54, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

There are multiple articles where individuals are statewide known -or lessor- who are published. Wikipedia policies make an exception for individuals who, like Joseph, who works behind the scenes while his clients -larger big time clients- get the attention and recognition. Even as is, the article is pretty notable, at least for the purposes of placeholding while he continues to obtain mainstream attention as the election season progresses. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:282:500:750:B8C3:31B8:4091:C627 (talk) 23:38, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Also try Jojo's Event Services and Security, LLC. That is his former body guard / management company. He also owned "An American Hostage" which was a controversial satirical publication. You might also check his connection to the controversy with James McGibney (Viaview), which lead to a lot of international media attention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:282:A02:1D30:99D:64CA:156:6579 (talk) 00:17, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

2601:282:A02:1D30:99D:64CA:156:6579, it's not going to help to cite sources that are associated with him. Needs more external news sources outside of the state. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:01, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Rejection of Nicolas Porter draft

Hi, thanks for reviewing the draft for 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Nicolas_Porter_(dentist)'. However, I need your help in making this article better, if you can, please. The moment I add anything that would make this subject stand out, and there is quite a bit of verifiable content to do that, some other editor would call it 'promotional' as it is already written under the review and delete the draft. How do I, then, make a subject stand out keeping the tone and content of the article neutral at the same time?

I have tried everything with multiple article submissions and it now just seems that drafts are rejected simply because they are paid contributions, even though I make sure that I disclose it without being asked. I am trying my best to follow the guidelines and write only neutral content using verifiable sources about notable subjects. A person who has been awarded and recognized by notable sources for his work (links provided), has changed the landscape of dentistry in several US states by providing low-cost and free treatment plans, has provided free treatment worth millions of dollars to thousands of people - I fail to understand how this person is not notable and note-worthy for other editors, regardless of his article's status as a paid contribution.

Sorry for the long message, but I am trying to do better and learn. Thank you in advance for the help. Ashley.Bell (talk) 22:09, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Ashley.Bell, if you are creating the article as a paid contribution, then you have conflict of interest in wanting his article to be on Wikipedia, so there is very little you can contribute directly to the article, and a lot of it would have to be contributed by talk page requests. If he's a local dentist who is well respected in his community, that's nice and all, but what makes him nationally or internationally notable? Are there external news articles outside of his local community that cover his life? Is he making regular rounds as an expert on talk shows or has his own television program on a major cable network? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:24, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

He has been called upon as a guest on a number of talk shows - I can provide the references and links to them. I thought that would make the article 'promotional'. He has been recognized outside his community, too. Wouldn't adding too many details about these things make it sound like an advertisement? For another article subject, I was asked to include fewer details of this kind because they said the article should be expanded upon by other editors or through edit requests eventually. I would be really grateful if you can provide some actual guidance here. I am trying to comply with the guidelines, but some of the other editors have made it really hard to do so. Thank you in advance! Ashley.Bell (talk) 15:20, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

If the articles are coming from the shows / newspapers as opposed ot his promotion. For example, if he is a regular writer for a magazine or television show, do not include his own writings / appearances, but provide external sources that describe him objectively. But yes, that can be added later. I wanted to make sure he has national notability like Barbara Corcoran who was a regular on the Today Show, and then became really famous for Shark Tank. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:37, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

The Draft:Nicolas Porter (dentist) is gone now as the editor was banned for sockpuppeting. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:16, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:MasterCard Foundation AfC

Hello, thanks for reviewing my draft, I think merging to MasterCard article wouldn't be acurate because although the company shareholders made the initial donation to start the foundation this organization is independent from the company, it has its own board, decision making and goals are totally unrelated with MasterCard company. Besides, this draft its just general stub, it has the potential to be expanded as the foundation is still active and growing. Do you think it would be better to merge them to a company totally unrelated with their operations? the foundation wouldnt have the space it deserves. LilaMorillo (talk) 19:28, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

LilaMorillo, then you would need to show independent notability with sources that meet WP:ORGCRIT AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:32, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Okay thanks, they have plenty coverage online specially on African news sites. Maybe these helo prove their notability.

References

I only need WP:THREE, pick your best 3 and post them on the draft in the AFC section. Make sure they aren't press releases or news announcements of the passing mention / news cycle kind. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:21, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Okay@AngusWOOF:, let's take a look at these three.

References

LilaMorillo, I posted the three on the draft article. I'm concerned though that they are only using them as press release / PR material, and that it only covers their actions and doesn't go into the details of the foundation itself; how it was created and such. Are there news articles that cover that? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:32, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

AngusWOOF There is a paper that talks about MasterCard IPO and the impact that the creation of the foundation had at the time.

References

Request on 06:56:49, 3 February 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Sarvmangal

• Sarvmangal (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Lakshan geet (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello dear my problem is how can I prove or verify online about my Draft: Lakshan geet. here I can provide two links and page no./column no. where about Lakshan geet has been written in hindi and I have translated in English language. but dear I don'nt know how it can be linked with my draft Lakshan geet .links are--

[[1]]book is Sangeet Visharad page no.132,column no.3,written by VASANT, editor-Lakshami Narayan Garg, Publisher- Sangeet Karyalay Hathras (up)India. 

[[2]] book is Sangeet Shastra Parichay,written by Acharya Vishawanath Rao Ringe 'Tanarang'. In column no.18-Hindustani sangeet  pranali me prachalit gayan ke prakar--second one is Lakshan Geet.-->

dear you are requested to help so that this page can be saved. REGARDS Sarvmangal (talk) 06:56, 3 February 2020 (UTC) Sarvmangal (talk) 06:56, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Sarvmangal, can you find some more online sources that describe this term? It's hard to tell whether those books are notable. Are they magazines/journals that have an article about the term? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:38, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

This article has been deleted as it was created by a banned user. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:56, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft: Lelo for Georgia

February 2, 2020: I think this rejection/suggestion to merge is not appropriate. See, among other things, the New_Rights_Party, which was merged into Lelo for Georgia, and even has an empty link in that direction. Sure, the party is new -- and Georgia (because of the economics of journalism) does not get much attention from the New York Times, but surely a national party that takes over a previous long-running party deserves an entry? And no, the party is not the personal property of Mamuka Khazaradze, even if he is the leader and has been mentioned extensively so far.

Yes, the entry could be expanded, but if it keeps getting rejected why should people from small countries ever bother? Among the sources, we have Al Jazeera, so this illustrates attention outside Georgia is there. How can this be reconsidered? I can of course add more local coverage, but the sources I cite are the most reputable and independent ones. Hundnase (talk) 17:19, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

• Hi, AngusWOOF now added even more references, linked back to Mamuka Khazaradze, and we have a reference from Foreign Policy -- hope this does it... Hundnase (talk) 19:53, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Hundnase, you can resubmit it. I suggest providing the three best sources per WP:THREE in the AFC comments section so the reviewers can consider those. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:14, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Hundnase, this article is in the mainspace now. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:49, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft: Dog Puller

Hi! Thanks for the comment you left. The article was about Dog Puller competition, not about the PULLER item (if that's confusing, I can rewrite most of the parts where PULLER is mentioned). I don't quite understand, why it's insignificant, though. Dog Puller is an official dog sport as Agility or Disc Dog and these two have their separate pages in this Wiki. Can you please give me some advice, what should I change to make the article clearly describing a type of international dog sport? Thanks! AnimaloverUA (talk) 08:31, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

AnimaloverUA, I would try to find more news articles that explain the Dog Puller competitions. It's not clear how they differ from agility or other ones. Also how widespread are they? They seem to be focused on the PULLER item though, which is why the article could be about the product. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 08:40, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

AngusWOOF, Thanks! The sport is widespread, the World Championship-2019 included 11 countries where the official federations exist and there are more than 30 countries that have unofficial clubs. I'll do the edits you suggested in a few days and rewrite the place where PULLER is needlessly mentioned. Shall I also shorten the Rules section and describe them briefly with the link to the Championship site? And may I create the PULLER (and other PULLER-like dog training tools) article separately and just link the two? AnimaloverUA (talk) 12:10, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

AngusWOOF, I have shortened and rewrote the Rules section, leaving only the basic principles. Also I added some words about the difference of Dog Puller, Agility and Disc Dog. I removed the word PULLER everywhere I could, so that it now looks less (I hope so) as an article about the product itself. I added some English sources that are not related to either COLLAR Company or Dog Puller official site and a list of the clubs all over the world. Hope this helps. AnimaloverUA (talk) 16:21, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

AnimaloverUA, the details of the specific contests such as the points awarded are not necessary at this time, although it can explain some of the types of contents it has. It needs to go more into the history and development of the sport. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:23, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

AngusWOOF, added more about history, accessibility and basic exercises (for hobby use too), also added some sources and delete the scoring parts of the competition. Please, re-check, when you have time? Thanks! AnimaloverUA (talk) 13:51, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Resubmitted Draft:GOBankingRates

Hi, thank you for your helpful feedback for construction of this draft. I have made all of the suggested edits based on your feedback for this draft. I updated the citations and footnotes per your suggestions. Could you please let me know if we are now on the right path. Draft:GOBankingRates

Thanks you for all of your help so far.

I apologize my first post was in a strange format so I fixed it.

ResearchProf00 (talk) 17:25, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Least used railway stations in the United Kingdom

Hello, I was wondering on what grounds that the draft was denied, and how I might want to get it certified as an official article? Also, your comments: It is not about the website itself; however I have reduced the amounts of citations from it. It is a list of ALL the least used stations since 1997/98 in every county. I hope this helps - please let me know on my talk page if you think anything could be improved to get it confirmed. Thanks IamMattDavies (talk) 07:42, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

IamMattDavies, are there some news articles that cover the least used stations? Not just a website. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:55, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Yes there are quite a few. I have tried to incorporate them where possible. IamMattDavies (talk) 18:58, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

IamMattDavies, can you cite the articles up front in the AFC comments section? Also, if it is primarily a list, it should be renamed to List of least used railway stations in the United Kingdom, and the list itself should be exposed instead of hidden in a section. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:30, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

IamMattDavies, it looks like it's been moved to mainspace. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:48, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

draft: Staraya derevnya

Hi AngusWOOF, Thanks for reviewing the page. I removed all references to Discogs and Bandcamp. Added reference to printed publication (7), British Library (11) and Allmusic.com (8, 12) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hniu (talk • contribs) 09:59, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

We are aware, especially me

WE ARE GOING TO DO THE RIGHT THING FOR THE BENEFIT OF BOTH

I'm starting to learn how to edit the Cristina Vee's Filmography article, Man. I think we can expand it, but with my mistakes, it's almost difficult but I'm starting to learn. I just hope someday we will be able to find the correct source for every single role, and I'm sure she will be appreciated by our efforts. The reason we do this is that we want the community to see all the good things she has done during her career. We will make it!!!!!! Peace, your neighbor J J2RoL (talk) 18:58, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

J2RoL, if you do, please use secondary news sources that indicate that Vee is participating in the show first, and not just depend on her self-published tweets. If someone wants a more complete list they can always go to her website or the not-so-accurate IMDb / ANN encyclopedia. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:37, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Jess Brown

Hi AngusWOOF, thank you for your helpful feedback for the continued construction of this draft. I am an independent PR manager and was submitting information on singer-songwriter Jess Brown. I received notifications from Wikipedia to edit and/or clarify certain information and remove any unsupported data. I am requesting help in understanding the specific requests and to prevent the draft from being deleted. Thanks for any and all help.

Bryan Ros (Aggie Brown (talk) 19:41, 12 February 2020 (UTC))

Bryan, please note that you would have a conflict of interest (read WP:COI) and would not be able to edit much of the article directly, short of correcting glaring incorrect information. I don't think the draft will be deleted unless it's blatantly promotional. If it is deleted for inactivity for six months, it can still be restored. See Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/G13 AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:40, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020

Hello AngusWOOF,

Source Guide Discussion

The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.

Redirects

New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.

Discussions and Resources

• There is an ongoing discussion around changing notifications for new editors who attempt to write articles.
• A recent discussion of whether Michelin starred restraunts are notable was archived without closure.
• A resource page with links pertinent for reviewers was created this month.
• A proposal to increase the scope of G5 was withdrawn.

Refresher

Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Mojtaba bitarafan

Hello, AngusWOOF. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mojtaba bitarafan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 15:02, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Bkissin, thanks, that was probably one of those I renamed and became the author by default. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:30, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

adittional voices i read the whole article

adittional voices i read the whole article

Please see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Anime_and_manga/Archive_70#When_are_additional_voices_eligible_for_inclusion_in_voice_actor_articles?_2 concerning the additional voices. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:55, 14 February 2020 (UTC) Really? Oh well, I guess that includes KHIII too. Well going to keep searching. Thanks anyway for the message. Im running out of ammo here but we will win this war. FOR VEE!!!!!!!!!!! J2RoL (talk) 17:26, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

J2RoL if you want to help out her article, find some more news writeups on Vee herself. There should be a bunch now that she's become more notable by Miraculous Ladybug. And if she has leading roles in other productions, that will help too. You can see how she's a regular in the Shantae video games. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:28, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Request on 20:40:14, 14 February 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Timofeytv

• Timofeytv (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Lobsang Nyandak (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi there! Kalon is a title, as like here: https://tibet.net/dont-wait-and-watch-change-make-it-happen-kalon-lobsang-nyandak/

Added REF to his position at Central Tibetan Administration as cabinet holder: President of The Tibet Fund and Former Representative of the Dalai Lama to Speak at Harford College

Timofeytv (talk) 20:40, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Woof!

@AngusWOOF:

I'm sure you're probably busy with lots of other editing, but when you get a chance, can you have a look at your comments and !vote over at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 February 15#Multitasking? You, Narky, and I are essentially all arguing the same thing, but your !vote on the proposed target suggests retargeting to one of the subject redirects, which is problematic at closing (see my rationale there). Thus, to make it more clear for the closer, I recommend refining the bolded !vote to suggest retargeting to Multitasking (disambiguation) and then, post-close, to moving Multitasking (disambiguation) --> to Multitasking over the redirect.

Thanks,
Doug Mehus T·C 16:00, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Will work further

Thank you for your review on Draft:LANDoftheBRAVEfilm I will work further on the article to meet your notes. I have also put in an username change request as per your COI notice.

NamibianCinema (talk) 16:40, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

NamibianCinema, thanks. Since the film has been released, there should be lots of critical reviews on it, both good and not so good. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:42, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

AngusWOOF, I will add them. Some of the reviews are in Afrikaans. What's the policy there? Should I translate them into English and link to the original review?

They can be in other languages, provided they are from notable newspapers / magazines. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:47, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

any tips while I wait for somebody to re-review?

hi. I've finally finished the Discography. does it look good? do I need to type out sources for each release (using CD and record covers)? is there anything more I can do? thanks in advance. ☺ Fulber (talk) 20:36, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Fulber, it's rather excessive. I would just keep the albums and notable singles. Have any of them charted? The goal is to try to present the article so that it clearly meets WP:MUSICBIO, indicating the news articles and sources where his work has charted or been nationally / internationally recognized by major newspapers and magazines. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:41, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

yes some were on the charts in the UK. there's a link to the official charts in References. thank you, Angus! 😊 Fulber (talk) 23:48, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Suryakant Chintaman Chafekar

Baffle gab1978 thanks for the copyedit. Are you okay with the COI tag being removed? Does it read neutral enough now? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:26, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Baffle gab1978 can I put your name for the "checked by" section in the connected contributor box? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:35, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

VoyageLA and like sites

Might be interested to read User talk:Praxidicae/fakenews/voyagexx spam. I don't think that we can call them reliable sources based on the linked article, and the reddit response. — billinghurst sDrewth 03:45, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

sDrewth, should this be brought up at WP:RSN? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:25, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Praxidicae and I have conversations about the xwiki stream of unreliable sources as we manage it, deal with it, and record it in a few places—meta (esp. w/ COIBot), wikidata and here, predominantly. So at some point, though we are still somewhat researching and identifying scope. Seems numbers of business models, definitely scurrilous behaviour, but also numbers of good editors in play. <shrug> More P's work than mine, I just drive the bot a lot, with Beetstra. — billinghurst sDrewth 21:59, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

How should we proceed Re: Neferpitou

The issue regarding how to describe the character isn't settled yet, and I don't like being accused of "pushing an agenda." What if we reached a compromise, by using they pronouns but specifying that the character is referred to using male pronouns in the manga?

Ziodyne (talk) 20:30, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Ziodyne, the manga takes precedence as primary media for the franchise, so if they used "he" as pronoun, then it's he. But it should be backed up with details, as with Zoe Hange. The description can be rewritten so it doesn't use any pronouns, and then discuss gender in the second paragraph. See Hange's description on how that is done. Using "they" right away is not a compromise as that wasn't used from the start in the manga but only in the English anime. The compromise would be to rewrite it without using pronouns. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:23, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Understood. I'll get right on it, then.

Ziodyne (talk) 18:26, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

re-review

hey Angus are you the one doing the re-review? if so, then I just wanted to point out that I've done more research and work on it, including another source added (TV appearance). Fulber (talk) 22:24, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Fulber if it's resubmitted, anyone on AFC can review it. It doesn't have to be me. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:05, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

...but...can't you do it? 😁 please? Fulber (talk) 00:51, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia wants me to wait "4 months". 😔 Fulber (talk) 00:55, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Fulber, can you cut the discography to just the singles that charted for now? It doesn't need to be every single release he has made, since not all those are notable. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:19, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

o k...will do. ☺ thanks for your help. Fulber (talk) 18:34, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

o k it's done I think. ☺ Fulber (talk) 21:42, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

o k I've really stripped it down to just a few singles. ☺ Fulber (talk) 13:56, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Fulber, can you fix the album and singles names? I don't believe they all have the word "Blame" in their album title. Have separate lists for albums and singles where he was the main artist or co-artist, and separate singles where he was a featured artist. Remove the "various artists" compilation albums unless those compilations have charted. Some of the works such as Logical Progression are actually under LTJ Bukem as primary artist. Then have a separate list for albums where he has more of a production / songwriting credit rather than as a primary artist on the album. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:14, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

o k. I will later today. thanks so much, Angus!!! ☺ Fulber (talk) 19:52, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

so I've looked at the changes. in this genre, a Producer is the "primary artist". all of the work that was listed was solo work (there were a few collabs that showed the other Artists). so almost all was solo work. in Drum&Bass, a Producer = solo Artist = Songwriter. I hope that explains it. 😁 I guess I'll just delete the extra categories? (Remixes were never included and would take another month or so to list.) Fulber (talk) 07:00, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

also, somebody typed that the releases are "unverified" but I had each catalogue number included. then I was instructed by a previous editor (Dianna?) to remove those details. so do I go back to the original discography I compiled for Wikipedia months ago with all of the catalogue numbers? that could take weeks. then I might be told to remove it all again. what now? Fulber (talk) 07:35, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Fulber, that's fine to delete the extra categories. The discography can be filled in later. I was thinking more if the producer was a supporting role as with Peter Saville (graphic designer) who did album cover art. If he's credited in the song itself as the performer then he's primary artist. If he's only credited as a songwriter, supporting musician, or audio editing then that should be a separate list. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:20, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Fulber, Logical Progression 2 would be an album that would go under the Various artists subsection and supporting producer credit. He has a few tracks on there that he is primary artist on, but isn't the primary artist for the entire album. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:03, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Un pas fragile & fr:Edge of Eternity

Hi Angus,

• I wanted to translate fr:Un pas fragile in English but noticed it was already done and declined. Since the evaluation, the game was reviewed by French website fr:Gamekult (the 2nd video game site in France) and earned two nominations at fr:Pégase (récompense). Do you think it would be enough to reevaluate it?

• I also wanted to translate fr:Edge of Eternity which is in early access but got massive coverage since its pre-release in France and some in English [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]. Do you think it is suitable?

Cheers, FR (talk) 13:52, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

FR, both drafts need more video game reviews from WP:VG/RS Stuff like Tom's Guide might not qualify as reliable sources. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:03, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi Angus, thank you for your answer :) I see in Wikipedia:Notability (video games) that it's not only about reviews but commentary and awards. French video games are usually poorly reviewed by American websites but widely reviewed by European media.

• For the first article, it's an IGF winner and we have Gamasutra, TouchArcade, fr:Gamekult (review), fr:JV - Culture jeu vidéo (review), several French-speaking newspapers (Le Temps, La Dépêche du Midi)... FR (talk) 14:52, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
• How can all those unreleased video games in Category:Upcoming video games be OK as they can't theoretically be reviewed? For Edge of Eternity, it has been previewed and widely covered by Jeuxvideo.com for instance

Cheers, FR (talk) 14:52, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Request on 09:49:28, 25 February 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Antovigo

• Antovigo (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Teacher bias in grading (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi! I agree it makes sense to move that to discrimination in education rather than having its own page. I was looking for such a general page, but Wikipedia has a lot of articles of this kind with sometimes very redundant content (educational equity, educational inequality, bias in education, sex differences in education). I'm not sure what should be done about that. Before I do the update, are there important modifications I should do to the content itself? As far as I can tell, there is no original research (every statement is explicitly mentioned in the cited source) and I don't think there are any opinions either. Again, I'm happy to correct things if you point out what needs to be. Antovigo (talk) 09:49, 25 February 2020 (UTC) Antovigo (talk) 09:49, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Antovigo, I'd see if they can fit in the sex differences in education article, since that has a grading bias section. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:33, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

What are the odds...

...that you would make an edit at the same time a user called "Kittykatty" signs up. Woof!

• User creation log 17:57 User account Kitttykatty talk contribs block was created
• N! User talk:Pack Keyy‎ 17:57 +4,732‎ ‎AngusWOOF talk contribs block‎ declined (AFCH 0.9.1) Drmies (talk) 17:58, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Nice! :) AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:27, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Teach-Now Graduate School of Education

Greetings Sir,

I sincerely apologize. I now understand what you mean. Thank you for responding so quickly.

Best,

Andre Barnes

!-- Template:Unsigned IP -->— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:3003:3614:1F00:1568:16E4:82B3:587D (talk) 18:18, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

You need to connect the references to the article, not leave them at the bottom of the References section. It should also be more than just two lines of description. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:20, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Also if you are representing the organization, you have a conflict of interest that you need to disclose. See WP:COI AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:26, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

WikiProject Guild of Copy Request not auctioned for my wiki article

Hi AngusWOOF,

Hope you are doing well. You had submitted a req on WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests page for review and to remove the CoI tag on my recently posted article. I don't think it was auctioned on and it got archived. Can you please check and let me know what are the next steps here?

23:58, 27 February 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manas.chafekar (talk • contribs)

Manas.chafekar, it was completed. See earlier on my talk page. I put in the GOCE completed messages on the talk page of the article. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:39, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi AngusWOOF,

I can now confirm that the CoI has been removed. Thank you. For your other comment " need someone from WP to scrub article for structure on honors, medals", I visited a few Military pages and asked for help on this. But it was not auctioned. Can you help me with this by pointing to someone /group who can check this. Manas.chafekar (talk) 14:38, 28 February 2020 (UTC)