Jump to content

Talk:Life extension

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AE3yia1AJeQ (talk | contribs) at 15:36, 13 March 2020 (New User). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Vital article

Template:Outline of knowledge coverage

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 January 2020 and 8 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Malaika1089 (article contribs).

Laron syndrome

Shouldn't we mention the Laron syndrome as a disease that could help us in creating life-extending therapies ? See http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/17/science/17longevity.html?_r=0

For users

LongevistThis user is a longevist

Add { { Longevist} } to your user page.


New User

Hello, I would like to assist with editing this page. How do I do so? AE3yia1AJeQ (talk) 13:43, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My edit has been reverted. How do I assist with editing this page? AE3yia1AJeQ (talk) 15:01, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
So long as your intention is to remove sourced content and add what is essentially a plug for this particular clinic, then the short answer is probably "you don't". GMGtalk 15:06, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
My intention is only to correct and improve the article. How might we proceed? We could focus on other aspects of the article? AE3yia1AJeQ (talk) 15:34, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
As I see it, AE made a bold edit. It was reverted. A consensus should be attempted here before any more edits are made to the article. Personally, I STRONGLY (yes capitalized) disagree with the edit by AE as an attempt to remove valid criticism of the "Young Blood"'s utter lack of scientific evidence. Strong medical claims require strong evidence. Instead, there is no valid evidence whatsoever. WP:MEDRS applies. David notMD (talk) 15:32, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I made a bold edit, as I was encouraged to. I'm a new user. I think the article should be rewritten to be based on cited sources and from a neutral point of view. I think there's a number of improvements we could make. May I participate in this discussion? There is only one peer-reviewed publication on this topic, by Alkahest, so you are incorrect about that. AE3yia1AJeQ (talk) 15:36, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]