User talk:Hissamelriys

File:Faxplus-logo.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:05, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed --Hissamelriys (talk) 21:17, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Roobee

Hello, Hissamelriys,

Thanks for creating Roobee! I edit here too, under the username Doomsdayer520 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Thank you for your new article on Roobee, but I recommend adding more evidence to show notability, beyond the company's basic existence. See WP:NCOMPANY for pointers.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:28, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed a file deletion tag from Kevin Leyes. When removing deletion tags, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 19:59, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you believe someone is a sock, you should present that evidence instead of making accusations, particularly as the deletion nomination is rather clear, despite it being malformed. Praxidicae (talk) 20:08, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sundayclose Are you sure? A new editor with just 3 edits placing a deletion tag and you think we should be wasting time on it? Hissamelriys (talk) 20:09, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't want the article deleted, express your concerns on the AfD page. If you think the editor is a sock, you need to go to WP:SPI or WP:ANI instead of inappropriately removing the template. But a word of caution: You've already gone to two admin boards, and forum shopping is a very bad practice that won't get you any support. My advice is let the AfD work itself out the usual way. Sundayclose (talk) 20:15, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sundayclose Thank you for the advise. I think I should focus on improving the article now. Hissamelriys (talk) 20:17, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Praxidicae do you have any suggestion as to how I can open a spi with only 1 account with no idea who the master might be? Hissamelriys (talk) 20:11, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea who they are and while I too find it suspicious, I'd focus more on improving the article for the reasons I just pointed out at the AFD. Praxidicae (talk) 20:12, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Praxidicae Thank you for the suggestion. I have focused more on improving the article. I was not sure how to add the additional newspaper and TV show links so I added these under a news separate section as "media coverage" and few more in other sections. Can you please check the article when you have time? I will greatly appreciate if you re-consider your vote on AFD after checking. Hissamelriys (talk) 16:39, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello Hissamelriys. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Hissamelriys. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Hissamelriys|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Template:Z159 GSS ^💬 05:56, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure what has made you think that but I am not being paid directly or indirectly. --Hissamelriys (talk) 06:36, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Off-wiki evidence tells a different story and I have shared the details with an admin and looking at the edit history of user Below in the box, I guess they might have some as well. GSS ^💬 07:07, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@GSS: It may also possible that Kevin tried to hire an editor to create him a Wikipedia page but the editor failed to create him the page so he had to ask a friend of help. I understood that you want to keep the Wikipedia clean from promotional pages. Because you shared the details with an admin so I am sure they will find something useful here. And I thank you for looking at the edit history of the user:Below in the box because I believe he was the guy who tried extorting money from Kevin and now wants to delete his page. Hissamelriys (talk) 07:20, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And what about FileZigZag‎? GSS ^💬 07:51, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: FileZigZag (April 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GSS was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FileZigZag and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:FileZigZag, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GSS ^💬 07:54, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:07, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Doc James: why did you blocked me indefinitely? Can you please clarify how I did advertising or self-promotion? Or even violated a rule that warrant an indefinite block? Hissamelriys (talk) 20:28, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You were editing for pay without disclosure. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:39, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Doc James: please tell me if Wikipedia gives a second chance to allow me to edit again? I have not received any money rather someone else is gaining the money and I have become a scapegoat here. I can send you the evidence who asked me to create the page and where. How can I send you? I do not want to edit Wikipedia for pay. I want to volunteer. Hissamelriys (talk) 21:04, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can email to me through WP or simple post it here.

You appear to be saying that one of your friends was being paid for the page. Had trouble creating it, so asked you? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:12, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Doc James: How do I email you? What is you email please? He's not a friend, not anymore. He goes by the name "Internet_Lord" in forums. You can search in Google. He also said that he had an account Meme Lord 519. I want to send you the screenshots of whatsapp chats where he requested me to create pages for him and in exchnage he would provide me with a Gdrive with unlimited space for lifetime. I never knew I could be permanently blocked from editing Wikipedia or that he is getting paid. Hissamelriys (talk) 21:52, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:55, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Email sent to you. Hissamelriys (talk) 22:29, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What ever you are doing here is a violation of WP:MEAT. If not you, your friend was hired to create pages that you started (per off-wiki evidence) and most of their accounts were blocked in the past. GSS ^💬 03:25, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@GSS: If that is the case then the person who get paid should be blocked, not me. I do not create pages for him. According to WP:MEAT, new editors or like-minded editors are brought for assistance in disputes. I am not a new editor, not here to influence consensus. In fact I have been editing Wikipedia long before he started. I do not want anymore trouble and I can assure you of no such violations from me rather I can help tracking down other paid articles by him and others. Hissamelriys (talk) 08:23, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Doc James: please check your email. Hissamelriys (talk) 08:23, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wesleyner7. It is clear you are a meatpuppet (WP:MEAT) of your friend, so I don't think you'll be unblocked. Your friend has been indef blocked earlier per CheckUser evidence for abusing multiple accounts. -- Java Hurricane 07:14, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@~~Wesleyner7~~ Hissamelriys, can you list all the articles that your so-called friend asked you to create. GSS ^💬 08:30, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@GSS: I do not get this? Are you trying to link me with Wesleyner7? He's just a sock among many others you still have not found yet. If it were me I wouldn't be asking here to unblock me. I would have created a new account. Email me if you want more evidences. I do not wish to leak out more here.Hissamelriys (talk) 09:03, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That message was for you. Please list all the articles here that your friend asked you to create. GSS ^💬 09:12, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Will I be unblocked then? Hissamelriys (talk) 10:11, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So you were to be paid with "Gdrive with unlimited space for lifetime"... You were working with a family of spam accounts. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:34, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Doc James: How many times do I have to say to you that I do not work for anyone. They requested to create the articles which I did and you deleted it. My other contributions or page creations are not paid by anyone in any means. I do not know why you guys are so obsessed with paid-editors! Speaking of morality, I have already seen it[2]. I have tried enough to convince both of you.Hissamelriys (talk) 18:14, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]