User talk:Tuxr

Tuxr, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Tuxr! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Masumrezarock100 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Kaushalendra Singh, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Please stop your disruptive editing. You are new to WP, but you should acquaint yourself with WP policies and procedures. Disruptive editing could get you banned from WP. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:41, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you think that article Kaushalendra Singh is approval on Wikipedia without improvement to adding some addtional citation. Then Only you are responsible in future issues after you will bane from Wp.

gaming the system

You made twenty rapid nonsense edits to User:Tuxr/sandbox. Please tell me what you think this accomplishes. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:31, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Karanshrivastva, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Chris Troutman (talk) 16:59, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But that user is changing the name of pages without permission as not any page removers or reviewers and have only around 200-300 edits. So is it right for do anything as! tuxr 17:06, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Notice of sockpuppetry block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Karanshrivastva. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 21:19, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why you had banned me from wikipedia. I'm not using multiple account. tuxr 17:45, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

If you will not unblock me then I will never use wikipedia. tuxr 17:49, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

At least give me one chance. tuxr 17:51, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

I will report you to another administrator and kick out from adminship. tuxr 17:52, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tuxr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have no multiple account please give me at least one chance

Decline reason:

A simple denial is not enough, as every sockpuppeteer denies doing so. If you are not a sockpuppet, you will have to provide a plausible explanation as to why the evidence indicates that you are, if you are not. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 18:14, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

tuxr 18:10, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

I will use wikipedia fearness in future please unblock me. tuxr 18:11, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

{{unblock|reason=I will use wikipedia fairly and deal with good way, I had used multiple account and you people banned me as shock puppetry or abusive account even I had never abuses anyone now I am using only one account please unblock me. tuxr 18:15, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Tuxr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will use wikipedia fairly and deal with good way, I had used multiple account and you people banned me as shock puppetry or abusive account even I had never abuses anyone now I am using only one account please unblock me.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I will use wikipedia fairly and deal with good way, I had used multiple account and you people banned me as shock puppetry or abusive account even I had never abuses anyone now I am using only one account please unblock me. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I will use wikipedia fairly and deal with good way, I had used multiple account and you people banned me as shock puppetry or abusive account even I had never abuses anyone now I am using only one account please unblock me. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I will use wikipedia fairly and deal with good way, I had used multiple account and you people banned me as shock puppetry or abusive account even I had never abuses anyone now I am using only one account please unblock me. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

tuxr 18:17, 13 April 2020 (UTC)