User talk:Piotrus

You have the right to stay informed. Exercise it by reading the Wikipedia Signpost today.

This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived. Sections without timestamps (not signed with ~~~~) are archived manually when I get around to it.

"You have new messages" was designed for a purpose: letting people know you have replied to them. I do not watch your talk page and I will likely IGNORE your reply if it is not copied to my page, as I will not be aware that you replied! Oh, Template:Talkback is ok. Thank you.

Please add new comments in new sections if you are addressing a new issue. Please sign it by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~. Thanks in advance.

Archive

Talk archives:

Reasons for my raising wikistress: Some general observations on Wikipedia governance being broken and good editors trampled by the system Wikipedia is a kawaii mistress :) I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms. Current RfAdminship RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report Significa liberdade 83 0 1 100 22:18, 21 September 2024 5 days, 16 hours no report RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report Last updated by cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online at 05:21, 16 September 2024 (UTC) Lurking stats Page views for this talk page over the last 90 days Detailed traffic statistics Category:Jewish merchants has been nominated for deletion Category:Jewish merchants has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. KasiaNL (talk) 03:54, 14 May 2020 (UTC) Concerns on your editing Piotrus, I looked at your edits after this: [1]. In that edit, you abused otwarta.org source [2]. otwarta.org does not see Antipolishness of the Polish Jews book legitimate. otwarta.org does not cover the nutjob of Judeopolonia - the Jewish state in Poland book at all. The "explaining the origins of pre-war Jewish saying 'our tenements, your streets'" is sourced in your edit to the nutjob book, and treats antisemitic saying as Jewish. 'our tenements, your streets' ("Wasze ulice, nasze kamienice") is an infamous antisemitic saying: [3], [4]. From [5]: "Wasze ulice, nasze kamienice (Your streets, our houses) is a popular Polish saying, which anti-Semites ascribe to Jews who..." Looking at edits today, I also alarmed. What were you thinking in creating Category:Jewish merchants as only member of Category:Merchants by ethnicity? In Talk:Różan you have been making false claims, calling an encyclopedia a yizkor book. Is there some explanation here I missing?--KasiaNL (talk) 06:53, 14 May 2020 (UTC) Icewhiz, did you get permission from ArbCom to open a new account? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:22, 14 May 2020 (UTC) Huh? Do you answer why you place antisemitic saying as Jewish? Why you create category? I think this wrong.--KasiaNL (talk) 07:24, 14 May 2020 (UTC) Banned editors are not allowed to edit Wikipedia. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:28, 14 May 2020 (UTC) You suggest I start board discussion to ban? Can't you explain your edits?--KasiaNL (talk) 07:35, 14 May 2020 (UTC) Ban, huh? Read up on WP:BANREVERT (15:25, May 14, 2020 Materialscientist talk contribs blocked 2601:585:8200:f310::/64 talk with an expiration time of 31 hours (anon. only, account creation blocked) (Disruptive editing)). As you restored that "disruptive editing" you may want to take a pause here. Also WP:BOOMERANG. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:26, 14 May 2020 (UTC) Reply Thank you for the information. PavKls— Preceding unsigned comment added by PavKls (talk • contribs) 19:52, May 14, 2020 (UTC) ActCAD Hi Piotr! Thanks for the info. I will try to improve this article and the one on the Polish wiki. Best wishes....ZengaONE (talk) 12:50, 14 May 2020 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CLXIX, May 2020 Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at fortifications, the German Army, and post-Cold War conflict The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:03, 15 May 2020 (UTC) "Battle of Hel" ping Re: "* The second air raid, the same day at 18:00 I think we need an "at" before the second "the". + I'll ping User:Nihil novi, as I am not a native English speaker, but the sentence reads ok to me? I don't understand the question. The sentence appears to be correctly written. Could the critic clarify his concern? Nihil novi (talk) 04:30, 16 May 2020 (UTC) DYK for The Forgotten Holocaust: The Poles Under German Occupation, 1939–1944 On 17 May 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Forgotten Holocaust: The Poles Under German Occupation, 1939–1944, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the book The Forgotten Holocaust: The Poles Under German Occupation, 1939–1944 resulted in a series of reviews and letters that were described as "particularly vicious"? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The Forgotten Holocaust: The Poles Under German Occupation, 1939–1944), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. — Maile (talk) 00:02, 17 May 2020 (UTC) Talk:Żydokomuna Hi Piotrus, I was reading the discussion on the Talk page and I was struck by this comment: [6]. I assume it occurred in the moment of frustration over the influx of socks/SPAs in the topic area, including both disruptions of articles and attacks on you on your own Talk page. I understand your frustration and I can relate since in my earlier days on Wikipedia I was frequently on the receiving end of derisive comments such as "POV-pusher", "Nazi hunter", and so on. Also from personal experience: such comments cut deeper when they come from established editors, not just from trolls. Being tied to someone who'd been Arbcom banned for harassment is up there and comes across as an ad hominem. We should not let our frustrations boil over so that they target long-term, good-faith editors. In the spirit of AGF, I hope you would consider striking the comment. --K.e.coffman (talk) 03:57, 17 May 2020 (UTC) Hi User:K.e.coffman. I have no problem refactoring my comments if someone finds them less than constructive, although I meant it just as a simple statement of fact with no ill intention. But in the show of good faith, I'll strike it, as it is also, whatever else, WP:DFTT, and NOTAFORUM anyway. However, since you mentioned this incident, I wonder if you could ask Sarah to extend a similar courtesy by asking her to refactor or strike her comments in a recent discussion at User_talk:François_Robere#Request_to_refactor_personal_attacks. As I said there, I found a number of her comments very hurtful, and I've asked her to refactor them; my repeated requests for that have been totally ignored. If you are concerned about the comment I made above, I'd hope you'll also consider tackling this issue, in the spirit of restoring collegial atmosphere and good faith in this topic area. I certainly believe that CIV, AGF and NPA are closely related and very important to respect and I am happy to help - but I'd like to be also likewise treated in a good-faithed, civil fashion by others. I hope this is not too much to ask for. Thank you, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:17, 17 May 2020 (UTC) Question about the article Hello sir, While i edit my artilcle, I found out that there are not enough references for supporting my article. So I want to discuss about changing the title of my article to 'History of candlelight rally in South Korea' Do you mind if I change my title? Thank you always. Have a good day. WoojinJeong:talk —Preceding undated comment added 04:12, 18 May 2020 (UTC) @Woojin Jeong: I'd recommend finishing your current article and then starting a new one, based on a translation from Korean Wikipedia. Is there an article you want to translate for History of candlelight rally in South Korea? There is already a large article about the 2016–2017 South Korean protests.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:22, 18 May 2020 (UTC) Response to your message on my talk page Hello sir, Okay i think it is better to finish my first article even though my article's quality will not be cool. The link you comment on my page, is about the protest only between from 2016 to 2017. So i want to make an article about the history of the candlelight rally (from the first rally in Korea to the latest rally). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Woojin Jeong (talk • contribs) 05:16, 18 May 2020 (UTC) To.Professor - Collective Intelligence , Yerim Han (한예림) Professor, I would like to ask for your feedback on my sandbox. I wonder if the article I am writing is being written properly. Thank you :) Yerim Han (talk) 10:03, 18 May 2020 (UTC)