User talk:PanzaMain

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plastiq Inc. has been accepted

Plastiq Inc., which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zanimum (talk) 15:30, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

PanzaMain, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi PanzaMain! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Keelan (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Paid editing disclosure

Thank you for disclosing your paid editing status, this is a start but is not sufficient. WP:PAID requires that you provide links to your profiles on all sites where you "advertise, solicit or obtain paid Wikipedia-editing services" to fully comply with the policy. GSS ^💬 18:02, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

unfair block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PanzaMain (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I don't understand why have I been blocked and my draft that was recently approved removed. It seems too unfair, and I need more explanation. I don't know what the problem is with editting for Plastiq, I did use this draft as base but cleaned up tone and sources that I did not think was reliable[1].. I followed every guideline to include my draft. PanzaMain (talk) 17:32, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 17:41, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Ser Amantio di Nicolao: @KrakatoaKatie: @David Gerard: @Neutrality: @Callanecc: @GSS: hi, I followed the article wizard step by step to create my draft Wikipedia:Article_wizard, please help me unblock my account. I can't find any case where doing a AfC submission is abusive. I don't understand, I am willing to answer any question to fix this misunderstanding. PanzaMain (talk) 11:26, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

@Yamla: Okay I need help, I am not sure how to convice you. I am being accussed without any proof I've done anything wrong.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

PanzaMain (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Reading WP:GAB and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Josher8a. I think I've been blocked on a suspicion I am Josher8a but based on my edits you can tell I was not trying to advertise or damage the encyclopedia, copy paste is a tool everyone can use and its not abusive to use it (I think). The draft I used as base was this one but I rewrote some parts and cleaned up tone to follow Wiki encyclopedic guidelines. I don't see any of my edits as disruptive, abusive nor unnecesary, If you have any question, I am very willing to answer and resolve this issue. PanzaMain (talk) 17:58, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Reading [[WP:GAB]] and [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Josher8a]]. I think I've been blocked on a suspicion I am Josher8a but based on my edits you can tell I was not trying to advertise or damage the encyclopedia, copy paste is a tool everyone can use and its not abusive to use it (I think). The draft I used as base was this one but I rewrote some parts and cleaned up tone to follow Wiki encyclopedic guidelines. I don't see any of my edits as disruptive, abusive nor unnecesary, If you have any question, I am very willing to answer and resolve this issue. [[User:PanzaMain|PanzaMain]] ([[User talk:PanzaMain#top|talk]]) 17:58, 21 June 2020 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Reading [[WP:GAB]] and [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Josher8a]]. I think I've been blocked on a suspicion I am Josher8a but based on my edits you can tell I was not trying to advertise or damage the encyclopedia, copy paste is a tool everyone can use and its not abusive to use it (I think). The draft I used as base was this one but I rewrote some parts and cleaned up tone to follow Wiki encyclopedic guidelines. I don't see any of my edits as disruptive, abusive nor unnecesary, If you have any question, I am very willing to answer and resolve this issue. [[User:PanzaMain|PanzaMain]] ([[User talk:PanzaMain#top|talk]]) 17:58, 21 June 2020 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Reading [[WP:GAB]] and [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Josher8a]]. I think I've been blocked on a suspicion I am Josher8a but based on my edits you can tell I was not trying to advertise or damage the encyclopedia, copy paste is a tool everyone can use and its not abusive to use it (I think). The draft I used as base was this one but I rewrote some parts and cleaned up tone to follow Wiki encyclopedic guidelines. I don't see any of my edits as disruptive, abusive nor unnecesary, If you have any question, I am very willing to answer and resolve this issue. [[User:PanzaMain|PanzaMain]] ([[User talk:PanzaMain#top|talk]]) 17:58, 21 June 2020 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

• PanzaMain, are you sure this wasn't picked up by you through Upwork? GSS ^💬 12:25, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

@GSS: I am very sure sir, I don't own an Upwork profile. This connection was made through email but I do know that Plastiq team are looking for wikipedia editors though. PanzaMain (talk) 13:32, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Hello

@RoySmith:@RoySmith: Hello, Could u review my block? I am willing to answer any question you may have. I just want to say that the sockpuppet is false, this has to be a mistake. As far as I know I have followed Wikipedia's policy and guideline, please talk to me.. I am sorry if I editted for a company that had issues with Wikipedia in the past but this has nothing to do with me and I was not aware that this would happen. PanzaMain (talk) 13:51, 27 June 2020 (UTC)