User talk:Praxidicae

This is Praxidicae's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29: 14 days

Al Cannon

Hi. Can I ask why you rolled back my edit to Talk:Al Cannon? --DannyS712 (talk) 02:16, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

pretty sure I fat fingered that on my phone. I didn’t even notice Sorry. Praxidicae (talk) 02:20, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the outing that you removed - was I the one outed? DannyS712 (talk) 02:26, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

Hey I am sorry, actually by mistake It got Rollbacked, your edit. Apologies. Stonertone (talk) 14:55, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have rollback, stonertone and in order to undo an edit, you have to go through the process of clicking undo, going to a second page and saving it. So again, explain. Praxidicae (talk) 14:56, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am a user of wp:Twinkle, so whoever uses the twinkle gets the option of roll back, thus it happened by mistake. Stonertone (talk) 14:58, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And you still have to confirm it...but good job contrib stalking me, pal. Praxidicae (talk) 14:59, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

haha, ohh loads of love to you😊, thanks for making me learn things and inspiring newcomers like me, but trust me praxidicae I am really not lying, it happened by mistake I hope if there is any sort of way i could show you the sceen shot of the rollback think in my account.Stonertone (talk) 15:04, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Contesting deletion of Lightstep,_Inc.

Hi, I see that you have applied for the deletion of Lightstep,_Inc. . First of all, that article was written using references from reputed News Agencies. This organization has raised more than $40 Million in fundings. This is something that will inspire people. So, I have contested speedy deletion of the page. Thanks Theproeditor7 (talk) 16:11, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Praxidicae, hope you're doing well. I'm asking for advice on Talk:Lightstep, Inc.. The {{db-g8}} template says, and I quote, "This page may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion as a dependent page of a page which does not exist, has been deleted, or is itself currently tagged for speedy deletion. This does not include pages which are useful to the project such as user subpages and talk pages, talk page archives, information for a future article, Articles for Creation drafts, etc. See CSD G8." Henceforth, I tagged it as the corresponding page is tagged for CSD. Please clarify the revert. Thanks, ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 18:09, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Which part of this criteria do you think applies? The corresponding article exists and I have never once seen g8 apply to an article that is undeleted. Praxidicae (talk) 18:09, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The template says that talkpages of pages tagged for CSD are also eligible for this criterion. ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 18:11, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is never done in practice. It doesn't need to be tagged g8 unless the article is deleted, in which case the talk page is automatically deleted anyway. Praxidicae (talk) 18:12, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Praxidicae thanks for the clarification. ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 18:12, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On Shawn Huang Wei Zhong

New update, Shawn Huang just gotten elected into the 14th Parliament of Singapore with the win of Jurong GRC (See also: 2020 Singaporean general election). https://www.asiaone.com/singapore/ge2020-results-pap-wins-jurong-grc-7462-votes-over-rdu What else do I need to do to revert the redirect? – robertsky (talk) 20:12, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Admin's Barnstar

Thank you for helping me transfer the article

moved to draftspace

W Mozart (Talk) 12:07, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Whatculture

Hi I declined your nomination of WhatCulture as since the previous nomination I noted significant coverage in BBC News which was on the page which occurred after the last deletion debate. The speedy deletion should only be used for unambiguous deletions others should go to afd. This was already declined by another editor so if you still want it deleted please go to afd. PainProf (talk) 16:51, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mass reversion of content at Brittany Lee Lewis

This edit (and similar previous edits) to the article for Brittany Lee Lewis have been mass reversions of content including material that I added to the article with reliable and verifiable sourcing, as well as categories that were added to the article. It appears that in your zeal to label another editor as engaging in black hat seo operations, you are also removing perfectly valid content. I've reverted your edit again and ask you to take far more care in any future such mass content removals. Alansohn (talk) 13:21, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alansohn I reverted blatant promo sourced to fake sites that are operated by blackhat SEO firms. Praxidicae (talk) 13:22, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

this and this are completely fake "news" sites operated by said firms I referred to above. These are the sources you're claiming are reliable? That is laughable. And all you're doing is just restoring crappy sources and promotional material by an editor who was hired to promote her. Praxidicae (talk) 13:24, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the article history. Look at this edit. If you are accusing me of engaging in black hat seo operations as part of some vast conspiracy, this is wholly laughable. As I said before "in your zeal to label another editor as engaging in black hat seo operations, you are also removing perfectly valid content". I don't care about your other bullshit about fake sites and other conspiracy theories; that's your crusade. If you want to deal with improper content and sourcing then do it correctly without deleting legitimate content. Alansohn (talk) 13:35, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't accuse you or the other editor, I am talking about the sources, which are absolute garbage as I stated above. Also take a chill pill. Civility is still a thing here, in case you don't remember. And the onus is on the person adding content for a BLP, which is also a policy and you know this. And my statement about hte other editor being hired to promote her is true, as per their disclosure on their talk page, so it's not an accusation either.Praxidicae (talk) 13:37, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, I agree with Prax that the BO Herald and the California Herald are not legitimate news sites, despite the thin veneer of respectability they attempt to portray. Both appear to have fake addresses, for instance, and both are a vaguely disguised press release/interview pretending to be legitimate journalism. I do not see where Praxidicae accuses or labels any Wikipedia editor of engaging in black hat SEO operations. Waggie (talk) 15:36, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Really Sorry

Actually I am new to this world of wikipedia. I don't know much about it. So I seek your help to edit the page 'k.m chandy (politician)'. So let's talk(or discuss) about adding new content. Actually,I didn't meant to make any editwar. If you felt any sort of provocation from me,I am really sorry....extremely sorry. Gautham chandy siby (talk) 16:41, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zanda Zakuza

Hi am F5pillar Seems a page Zanda Zakuza was deleted and were move to draft by you later before the deletion, I just want to request it recreation. I saw your talk page disclaimer about some stuff but am just requesting because i saw your name when I trying to create the article. Much regards (F5pillar---/ ^{Let's talk🖋📩}) 21:38, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

F5pillar, you do not need her permission to recreate the article, though the page was largely empty, improperly sourced, and copied from another location. (which is against the rules). Unless you've got good referencing to demonstrate notability, it might be a good idea to start a draft through the Article Wizard and have it reviewed. Primefac (talk) 11:18, 14 July 2020 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]

Alright then. Much regards (F5pillar---/ ^{Let's talk🖋📩}) 22:10, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Update Draft:David Koch Model en

Hi, I changed the article according to your objections. Thank you for these btw. I did not know about such SEO-based pages as they are quite different in Germany, where I live. I, too, did read the Ad/Paid information, which does not apply in my case. Is my understanding correct, that now you will re-review the article? Thank you for letting me know the next steps.

Best A3CTab (talk) 08:49, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch on the food blogger

Have you also looked at the other AFC approval from the same reviewer with the same creating editor? Fiddle Faddle 13:34, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, I hadn't, it was flagged because it was on my watchlist for UPE but also User:Praxidicae/fntest has a wealth of information on black hat SEO sites if you're interested. Praxidicae (talk) 13:44, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering how you were able to be so definite. Thank you. I'll put a link to your page in my toolbox.

I'm thinking this paid editor shoudl offer her clients some refunds. I share your concern about the reviewer's concentration. Looks to me to have been working too fast Fiddle Faddle 14:17, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Praxidicae, I will also refer you list for patrol at AFC. Thank you. ~ Amkgp 💬 15:00, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Islamic Swimwear is now at AfD. Now, a question. We have a keen reviewer who needs guidance. What are your thoughts? I'm happy to have a go. Fiddle Faddle 15:43, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	For all the hard-work in compiling User:Praxidicae/fntest. It stands really helpful during patrolling ~ Amkgp 💬 14:55, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Create articles

Hello, I have an inquiry. I have made two articles for more than 25 days and until now the article has not been reviewed or approved. Is there a procedure that I can take? With my greetings to you Ali.jamal3 (talk) 20:36, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did you see this racist filth?

[1] and [2] I am boiling. BetsyRMadison (talk) 04:13, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ishani Sengupta

Hi Praxidicae,

I got your message. Would you please advise if I need to add more reliable sources on the article? I have declared COI on my page. Do I need to mention it elsewhere as well?

Appreciation for development notes.

	Thankyou!
	Thankyou for the correction on my contribution. I am new to this, but that gives me a great idea on what to be wary of in the future. Thankyou kindly. Michael K. MichaelKondor (talk) 01:59, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]