User talk:Captain Galaxy

Hi, if you are here to tell me about a BADNAC that I have caused, don't worry you're not the first. However you may want to know I don't attribute myself with any of the discussion pages not even in discussing anymore. So if you are here for those please feel free to revert any mistakes I may have caused without even noting me as I don't want to go back to discussion pages and screw up more for others. If you are here to contact me about other issues, I am active between 10:00 (UTC) and 22:00 (UTC).

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clubhouse Games: 51 Worldwide Classics has been accepted

Clubhouse Games: 51 Worldwide Classics, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 18:57, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

PlayStation 5 list change

Could you edit and apply the changes that are applied to PS4 and Xbox One lists? I assume the current list are going similar to the Nintendo Switch list, which is an entirely different list. Thank you! Zacharyalejandro (talk) 22:15, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

• @Zacharyalejandro: I don't get what you mean, I am not the creator of the List of PlayStation 5 games page and I'm just tweaking any small mistake. Can you please elaborate? Captain Galaxy (talk) 22:20, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

  Sure can. Are you at all familiar with the List of PlayStation 4 games, its M–Z list, and both the List of Xbox One games lists? Zacharyalejandro (talk) 22:25, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

On the editing side of them, you can see they are split up and not shoved between one another similar to the List of Nintendo Switch games (A–L) and List of Nintendo Switch games (M–Z) which these are entirely different from another company. I don't want them to look the same. If you see where I'm going with this. Zacharyalejandro (talk) 22:29, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

@Zacharyalejandro:I definitely understand what you mean, however I don't have the time at the moment as it is quite late. Also, I'm not the most experienced wikipedian. Try asking another user. Good luck in your search. Captain Galaxy (talk) 22:40, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

No problem. If you have any questions or something, ask and I'll try to help out. Have a good night or day wherever you are :) Zacharyalejandro (talk) 22:46, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

RfD relisting

I noticed you Relisted a bunch of RfD discussions unnecessarily. When an RfD has only delete votes, the default result per WP:RGUIDE is delete—so those should be left to admins. For more information, be sure to check out WP:RELISTBIAS and WP:Relisting can be abusive. -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:10, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

@Tavix: My apologies if I have messed anything up and I hope I haven't ruined anything. I will have a look further into the guidelines. I only relisted discussions that didn't have either a clear consensus or barely had any discussion on it. I guess I have a lot to learn on here. Thanks for the help. Captain Galaxy (talk) 09:40, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy keep at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_June_13#Outline_of_art

I have a question. Which criteria for speedy keep does this follow? See WP:SK. Interstellarity (talk) 20:19, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

@Interstellarity: I'm sorry if I did anything wrong, I will undo the closure. However, I do feel like the discussion will result in a keep, but maybe not right now. Sorry for the inconvenience, I am still learning. 20:26, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Closure of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janeese Lewis George

Hi Captain Galaxy, and I hope all is well! I noticed that you closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janeese Lewis George as keep, but the votes are pretty split, and I don't think that it was an obvious keep. Per WP:NACD "Close calls and controversial decisions are better left to admins". I'd consider this a close call (by my count there are six keep votes and six for deleting or draftifying), and would appreciate it if you re-opened it, leaving closure to an admin. If you'd rather, we could discuss further at deletion review. I'd just consider the closure not as obvious as perhaps you did, nothing wrong with that. Best wishes, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 19:07, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

@Eddie891: Hi, sorry for any inconvenience and don't worry I have re-opened the discussion. I completely forgot that rule at the time and I am sorry. I hope I can be more helpful in the future. Captain Galaxy (talk) 19:28, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Completely fine! Thanks for your understanding and I hope to see you around in the future! Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 19:35, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Janeese Lewis George. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:51, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Category:Minor Nintendo franchises has been nominated for deletion

Category:Minor Nintendo franchises has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. OceanHok (talk) 16:16, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

AfD closure

I have undone yours per WP:BADNAC. Please read, and take on board. All the best, ——Serial ^# 21:37, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

@Serial Number 54129: Hi, thank you for fixing any mistake I have made and I appreciate it, sorry for the inconvenience. However which AfD was the problem? Captain Galaxy (talk) 21:41, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

I also get the AfD was reopened due to it being a close call, which wouldn't be the problem. I apologise. Captain Galaxy (talk) 21:43, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

BADNAC the second

To undo your closure of my RfD of Lady A, you must also undo the closing edits you made to the page and its talk page. Sandstein 16:08, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

@Sandstein: This has now been reverted. Again I am truly sorry. Captain Galaxy (talk) 16:18, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Woodcutting relist

Hey, I just came across your relist of Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_June_13#Woodcutting from a week ago. That discussion should have been left to an admin to close as either no consensus or with a compromise solution that accounts for the lack of consensus. It is incredibly rare for RfD discussions to be relisted three times, and in this case there was explicit discussion suggesting that a true consensus was going to be unlikely given the existing split of votes and arguments. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:13, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

@Rosguill: My apologises for any inconveniences of which my mistakes may have caused. Is there any way for the relisting to be reverted? Captain Galaxy (talk) 21:16, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Nah don't worry about it, at this point it's already been a week since the relist so the discussions can just be closed by an admin. Even if the week hadn't gone by, trying to undo the relist would have been more trouble than it's worth. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:18, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

@Rosguill: That's good to hear. In future, I'll keep my activity on afd and rfd at a bare minimum until I become more accustomed with Wikipedia's rules as it seems I cause a lot of problems for people, not that I mean to. I hope in future we can together on better terms. Thanks! Captain Galaxy (talk) 21:21, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

I wouldn't say that you need to stay away from those areas, but maybe focus on participating directly in the discussions rather than relisting them. There's a lot of unwritten norms around relisting that only become apparent when you've participated in discussions for a while. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:23, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

NAC challenge

Hi Captain Galaxy, please reconsider your non-admin closure of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kazutaka Kodaka. As you closed it, there are three !votes for keep, two !votes for redirect (which is NOT keep, it’s closer to delete than it is to keep), and the original nomination which for all intents and purposes is a delete !vote. By that count, that’s not a keep. That’s usually a relist. Red Phoenix ^talk 16:14, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

@Red Phoenix: Hi, I'm sorry for the NAC closure and I'm glad it's open again. I closed it because I thought it was 3 !votes for keep and 1 !vote to redirect. Sorry again for any inconvenience, thanks for the notice. Captain Galaxy (talk) 21:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

NAC

I just came here to inquire about this close which I find to be inappropriate. Considering your very short tenure here, I'd like to ask you to stop NACing for hte time being. AFDs are not a count of votes - had I noticed this at the time, I would have challenged your close. An NC was inappropriate and should have been left to an admin based on the substance of the comments - two "keeps" by two people who have extensively edited the article(s) in question and one account which is a clear SPA have no weight. I notice this is a frequent problem based on the complaints on your talk page, so again, I'd like to reiterate my request you stop doing non-admin closures. Thanks. Praxidicae (talk) 14:28, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

@Praxidicae: Hey, I'm sorry for the inconviances I have caused. You'll be happy to know I stopped doing this now and don't plan to in the future, this just happened to be a remnant from two weeks ago. I have reopened the discussion to get a better consensus. Thanks. Captain Galaxy (talk) 15:26, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

I was not kidding when I asked you to stop closing AFDs at best, this would be a NC in your case since it's all you can do. Please fix it. An admin could also delete it since it has no substance in the only two keep votes, one of which is an SPA and the other is someone heavily involved in the article and paid to do so. Praxidicae (talk) 11:05, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

@Praxidicae: OK, it's open and should stay there. I felt it was appropriate the first time to close as keep due to the outnumber. Please, I'm sorry. I don't want to get banned off of Wikipedia, I like what I do here and find it fun to help the encyclopedia. My apologises for this. Captain Galaxy (talk) 15:11, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Issuing level 2 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Elbrus Together. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:53, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

WP:FFD NACs

You have had plenty of warnings here about your WP:BADNACs. I am writing to let you know that I will be reversing all four of your WP:NACs from WP:Files for discussion, since as an administrator with more than ten years of experience in that area of the site, they were likely too close to call (two of them having no discussion after being relisted by other admins who felt they were too close to call).  ★  Bigr Tex 03:04, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

@BigrTex: Please go ahead, I'm clearly a problem a problem here and wish and any mistakes by mine are reverted. Captain Galaxy (talk) 08:46, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

I apologize if that is what came across from my message. My impression is that you are enthusiastic and trying to be helpful. In these cases, it did not work but it did not hurt anything. If nobody ever noticed those closes, it would almost certainly have not caused any significant harm - at some point, one or more of the files might have been renominated. I hope you have found more constructive ways to feel helpful and contribute around here.  ★  Bigr Tex 23:17, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

@BigrTex: You are right about me wanting to be helpful here. I did like to close discussions but I now fully understand I need to be on Wikipedia a bit longer before should do that. Don't worry, I am interested in making articles. Thank you for the message though. Captain Galaxy (talk) 09:03, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chibi-Robo! Zip Lash (video game) has been accepted

Chibi-Robo! Zip Lash (video game), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 14:16, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

en.wiki Encyclopedicity policy for Videogames

Good morning.
Which is the Encyclopedicity policy for Videogames in en.wiki??? I want to know because I want to traslate his page it:Utente:Esc0fans/Sandbox0 (written by mine, in cancelation in it.wiki). if you tell me if is possiblie, I'll start the translation (idk how much I need)
Thank you --Esc0fans -and my 12 points go to... 09:03, 25 July 2020 (UTC)