Minimum wage

The minimum wage is the minimum hourly, daily or monthly wage that must be paid to employees or workers, according to law. Each country sets its own minimum wage laws and regulations, and more than 90% of all countries have some kind of minimum wage legislation.

The first national minimum wage law was enacted by the government of New Zealand in 1896, followed by Australia in 1899 and United Kingdom in 1902. In the United States, statutory minimum wages were first introduced nationally in 1938, and in the United Kingdom in 1999. In the European Union, 18 out of 25 member states currently have national minimum wages. Many countries, such as Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Switzerland, Germany, Austria, Italy, and Cyprus have no minimum wage laws, but rely on employer groups and trade unions to set minimum earnings through collective bargaining.

Supporters assert that the minimum wage is a matter of social justice that helps reduce exploitation and ensures workers can afford basic necessities (cf. living wage). Supporters deny claims of causal links between the minimum wage and adverse impacts upon employment, and suggest that, in any event, greater social benefit derives from the minimum wage. Detractors contend that a minimum wage increases unemployment among low-wage workers, thus harming rather than helping the poorest workers. Some also argue that it slows economic growth. More specifically, detractors contend that labor has a free market price (wages, salaries, and benefits) determined by supply and demand just as any other commodity or service. A legislated price floor above the free market price for this labour will cause a surplus of labor (unemployment) compared to what otherwise would be the case, just as a legislated wage ceiling below the free market wage will cause a shortage of labor. A majority of economists believe these laws are self-defeating.

Legislation in the Western Industrialized World

The first moves to legislate wages did not set minimum wages, rather the laws created arbitration boards and councils to resolve labour conflicts before the recourse to strikes.

• In 1896, New Zealand established such arbitration boards with the Industrial Conciliation and Arbitration Act
• In 1899, the state of Victoria, Australia established similar boards
• In 1907, the Harvester decision was handed down in Australia. It established a 'living wage' for a man, his wife and two children to "live in frugal comfort"

The established similar boards

• In 1909, the Trade Boards Act was enacted in the United Kingdom, establishing four such boards
• In 1912, the state of Massachusetts, United States, set minimum wages for women and children
• In the 1960s, minimum wage laws were introduced into Latin America as part of the Alliance for Progress; however these minimum wages were, and are, low

In the United States and other countries, minimum wage laws were a common demand of labor unions.

Australia

• The notion of a "basic wage" was first established in 1907 with the Harvester Judgment.
• The current federal minimum wage for full or part time employees aged over 21 in Australia is AU$13.47 (~US$10.50) per hour.
• In 2005, the Federal Government implemented significant changes to the nation's labour system. These changes do not explicitly lower the minimum wage (in nominal terms) but may slow its rate of increase. (See also, Australian Industrial Relations Law Reform 2005.)

Canada

Main article: List of minimum wages in Canada

Under the Canadian Constitution's federal-provincial division of powers, the responsibility for enacting and enforcing labour laws rests with the ten provinces; the three territories also were granted this power by virtue of federal legislation. This means that each province and territory has its own minimum wage. The lowest general minimum wage in force as of July 2006 is that of New Brunswick (C$6.70 an hour), the highest is that of Nunavut (C$8.50 an hour). In Ontario it is C$7.75 an hour. Some provinces allow lower wages to be paid to liquor servers and other tip earners, and/or to inexperienced employees. British Columbia allows employers to pay as little as C$6 an hour to an inexperienced worker.

The federal government could theoretically set its own minimum wage rates for workers in federal jurisdiction industries (railways, for example). As of 2006 however, the federal minimum wage is defined to be the general adult minimum wage rate of the province or territory where the work is performed. This means, for example, that a railway company could not legally pay a worker in British Columbia less than C$7 an hour regardless of the worker's experience.

France

As of July 2006, the minimum wage in France is set at €8.27 (~US$10.80) per hour. In 2004, 15% of the working population received the minimum wage.

Ireland

Ireland's minimum wage was introduced in 2000, and is currently €7.65 (~US$10.15) an hour. This is subject to reduction as follows:

• 30% reduction for all employees under 18
• 20% reduction for employees over 18 in their first year of employment in any job since they turned 18
• 10% reduction for employees over 18 in their second year of employment in any job since they turned 18

It may further be reduced by up to €7.73 a day if lodgings or food are provided as part of a job. Due to general difficulties in finding employees, most jobs pay above the minimum wage, with only 3.1% of employees receiving it in 2004.

In January 2007, the minimum wage in Ireland will rise to €8.30 (~US$11) per hour and in July 2007 it will rise further to €8.65 (~US$11.40) per hour. This was announced in the 2007 Irish Budget.

United Kingdom

Municipal regulation of wage levels began in some towns in 1524. Later, the Trade Boards Act of 1909 initially created four Trades Boards that set minimum wages which varied between industries for a number of sectors where "sweating" was generally regarded as a problem and where collective bargaining was not well established. This system was extended considerably after the Second World War; in 1945 Trades Boards became Wage Councils, which set minimum wage standards in many sectors of the economy, including the service sector as well as manufacturing. Wage Councils were finally abolished in 1993, having fallen into decline due, in large part, to Trades Union opposition. A lower limit of pay, or "pay floor" was regarded as threatening the voluntary system of collective bargaining favoured in the UK. The government had first made a serious attempt to abolish Wage Councils in 1986, having abandoned existing legislation that tried to widen the scope of voluntary agreements to include those firms that had not taken part in negotiations, such as the Fair Wages Resolutions. These required that government contractors pay fair wages and respect the rights of their employees to be members of trades unions.

A National Minimum Wage (NMW) was introduced for the first time by the recently elected Labour government on 1 April 1999 at the rate of £3.60 per hour for those workers aged 22 and over. This rate was set after the Low Pay Commission (LPC), an independent body the government appointed in July 1997 to advise it on low pay, recommended the rate. The LPC's permanent status was later confirmed and it continues to make recommendations to government on the NMW, which has been uprated in October every year since 2000. The LPC board consists of nine members—three trade unionists, three employers, and three labour market relations experts. The Commission undertakes consultations each year to gather available evidence before making recommendations in its biennial review—the next such set of recommendations being due in the spring of 2007.

The current minimum wage in the UK for adults aged 22 or older is £5.35 per hour (c.$10.00, compared with US$5.15 in the US). For workers between the ages of 18 and 21, or any workers who are in the first six months of their job and receiving accredited training, the minimum wage is £4.45 (~US$8.65) per hour. The minimum hourly wage for all workers under the age of 18 (who are no longer of compulsory school age) is £3.30 (~US$6.40). There is no minimum wage for those still of compulsory school age.

Some workers undertaking apprenticeships or accredited training may be exempted (that is, not considered eligible to receive the NMW) for a certain period of time, which varies according to their age and the length of time in employment. Other categories of worker who are exempt include au pairs, share fishermen, clergy, those in the Armed Forces, prisoners and some people working in family businesses. The rate payable under the NMW can, in all cases, also be reduced where accommodation is provided to the worker.

Unlike most other employment rights legislation in the UK, which generally rely on affected individuals raising grievances and making claims, if necessary, before tribunals to enforce these rights, the NMW has compliance teams, attached to Hey Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC) offices who will act on approaches from workers who think they are being paid less than the minimum wage by contacting and visiting their employers. Affected workers can either make a complaint directly to a national helpline (0845 6000678) or seek advice from another agencies such as their local Citizens Advice Bureau or the Scottish Low Pay Unit—this is particularly recommended if other employment rights issues are involved, as the HMRC can only deal with minimum wage enquiries.

See also: National Minimum Wage Act 1998

United States

The first attempt at establishing a minimum wage in the United States came in 1933, when a $0.25-per-hour standard was set as part of the National Industrial Recovery Act. However, in the 1935 court case Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States (295 U.S. 495), the United States Supreme Court declared the act unconstitutional, and the minimum wage was abolished.

The minimum wage was re-established in the United States in 1938 (pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act, which can be viewed here), once again at $0.25 per hour ($3.22 in 2005 dollars). It had its highest purchasing value ever in 1968, when it was $1.60 an hour ($9.12 in 2005 dollars). The current federal minimum wage is now $5.15 an hour.

Comparison of State and Federal Minimum Wage (out of date)

During his presidency, Bill Clinton gave states the power to set their minimum wages above the federal level. As of April 2006, 18 states had done so. Community organizing efforts initiated by large coalitions of local groups, labor, religious and political offshoots of the Democratic Party were responsible for the increases in some states such as Florida, Nevada, and Ohio. Some government entities, such as counties and cities, observe minimum wages that are higher than the state as a whole. One notable example of this is Santa Fe, New Mexico, whose $9.50-per-hour minimum wage is currently the highest in the nation, while New Mexico itself observes the federal minimum. Another device to increase wages, living wage ordinances, generally apply only to businesses that are under contract to the local government itself.

On 7 November 2006, voters in six states (Arizona, Colorado, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, and Ohio) approved statewide increases in the state minimum wage. The amounts of these increases ranged from $1 to $1.70 an hour and all increases are designed to annually index to inflation.

Many progressive politicians in the United States advocate linking the minimum wage to the Consumer Price Index, thereby producing small annual increases rather than the larger hikes that tend to be adopted when legislation to do so is passed. So far, Ohio, Oregon and Missouri have linked their minimum wages to the consumer price index.

Minimum wage jobs rarely include health insurance coverage, although that is changing in some parts of the United States where the cost of living is high, such as California, and at some companies. For instance, Trader Joe's supermarkets give part-time employees health coverage.

See also: List of U.S. state minimum wages

Other countries

The current (2006) "monthly income for a full-time employee earning the national minimum wage" for twenty industrialised countries can be found here at the Europa Web site.

Brazil

The Brazilian national minimum wage is adjusted annually. As of December 2006, the minimum wage is R$350 per month.[1]

Brazilian states can set higher minimum wages, which may vary in different economic sectors.

In Brazil each increase the minimum wage results in a large burden on the federal budget, because the minimum wage is tied to social security benefits.

China

The Ministry of Labor and Social Security set China's first minimum wage law on 1 March 2004. The Regulations on Enterprises Minimum Wage was made to "ensure the basic needs of the worker and his family, to help improve workers' performance and to promote fair competition between enterprises." One monthly minimum wage was set for full-time workers, and one hourly minimum wage for part-time workers. Provinces, municipalities, and autonomous regions are allowed to legislate for their own minimum wage separate from the national one.

The Chinese province Guangdong increased its minimum wage on 1 September 2006 and was split into five categories. The highest is ¥780 per month or ¥4.66 (~US$0.60 an hour) an hour (in Guangzhou city). The lowest is ¥450 per month or ¥2.69 (~US$0.35 an hour) an hour.

India

Minimum wage in India is dependent on the industry. It varies between Rs 50.33 and Rs 86.63 per day. However, this is not being implemented strictly and vary depending on the location (urban or rural).

Israel

As of April 2002, the minimum was was ₪3,266.58 per month, or ₪17.56 an hour.

Japan

In Japan minimum wage depends on the industry and the region. The lowest minimum wage for a region (Miyazaki) is ¥4,712 (~US$40) per day, and the highest minimum wage for a region (Tokyo, Kanagawa, Osaka) is ¥5465 (~US$46.30 per day. The minimum wages are set by the Minister of Labour or the Chief of the Prefectural Labour Standards Office. Recommendations are made by the Minimum Wage Council.

Pakistan

Pakistan's first minimum wage was implemented in 1992 at 1,500PKR (~US$24.60) per month. In 1996 it was raised to 1,650PKR (~US$27.10) per month. As of 1998 the minimum wage was 1,950PKR (~US$32) per month. This wage does not apply to agricultural workers, however.

Russia

As of 1 January 2005 the Russian minimum wage was 720RUB (~US$27.30) per month.

South Korea

As of September 2003, the South Korean minimum wage was ₩2,510 (~US$2.70) per hour, ₩20,080 (~US$21.70) per day, or ₩567,260 (~US$612.55) per month. Companies of less 10 employees are exempt of this law.

Sri Lanka

Sri Lanka does not have a national minimum wage, but the law provides for and enforces the decisions of wage boards for specific sectors and industries.

Debate over consequences of minimum wage laws

Classical economic theory (Supply and Demand) says that by mandating a price floor above the equilibrium wage, minimum wage laws cause unemployment. This is because a greater number of workers are willing to work at the higher wage while a smaller numbers of jobs will be available at the higher wage. Companies can be more selective in who they employ thus the least skilled and unexperienced will typically get excluded.

Comparison of the minimum wage to unemployment among low skill workers in the U.S. The two lowest points are for the years 1999 and 2000. Unemployment for all workers in those two years was the lowest since 1970. The data shown here indicate that increases in the minimum wage are associated with increases in unemployment among lower-educated workers.

Comparison of the minimum wage to unemployment among college educated workers in the U.S. The data shown here indicate that increases in the minimum wage are not associated with increases in unemployment among higher-educated workers.

There are many other variables that can complicate the issue such as monopsony in the labour market, whereby the individual employer has some market power in determining wages paid. Whilst single employer market power seems unlikely to exist in most labour markets if understood in terms of the traditional 'company town' exposition, information and mobility imperfections, together with the 'personal' element of the labour transaction give some degree of wage-setting power to the majority of firms.

Economists disagree as to the measurable impact of minimum wages in the 'real world'. This disagreement usually takes the form of competing empirical tests of the elasticities of demand and supply in labor markets and the degree to which markets differ from the perfectly competitive efficient ideal.

A 2003 survey by Dan Fuller and Doris Geide-Stevenson reports that 46% of academic economists in the US fully agreed with the statement, "a minimum wage increases unemployment among young and unskilled workers", 28% partly agreed, and 27% disagreed. The authors of this study also reweighted data from a 1990 sample to show that at that time 62% of academic economists agreed with the statement above, while 19.5% partly agreed and 17.5% disagreed.

In the debate about minimum wage it is rarely mentioned by how much the quantity of labor demanded may fall if the minimum wage is raised. Research papers by the Employment Policies Institute and by the National Center for Policy Analysis claim that increases of 10% in the minimum wage may reduce demand hours worked at the minimum wage by around 1% or 2% depending on circumstances.

Comparison of the minimum wage to unemployment-population ratio among blacks relative to whites in the U.S. The data shown here indicate that increases in the minimum wage may be (though weakly) associated with increases in unemployment among black workers (relative to white workers).

According to a claim by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, the passage of the first Federal mandated minimum wage in the United States in 1933 led to an estimated 500,000 blacks losing their jobs via replacement by higher skilled and more educated white laborers. Milton Friedman, 1976 Nobel Prize winner in Economics, called the minimum wage one of the most "anti-negro laws" for what he saw as its adverse affects on employers.

Today, the International Labour Organization (ILO) and the OECD do not consider that the minimum wage can be directly linked to unemployment in countries which have suffered job losses.

Costs and benefits

Benefits

Supporters of the minimum wage claim it has these effects:

• Increases the average living standard.
• Reduces worker exploitation.
• Can increase the economic efficiency of the economy where labour markets exhibit a high degree of market power on the part of employers.
• Forces employers to recognise the inherent worth of human labor.
• Stimulates consumption, by putting more money in the hands of low-income people who spend their entire paychecks .
• Stimulates economic growth by discouraging labor-intensive industries, thereby encouraging more investment in capital and training .
• Increases the work ethic of those who earn very little, as employers demand more return from the higher cost of hiring these employees.
• Decreases the cost of government social welfare programmes through increasing labour supply amongst the low skilled.
• Prevents in-work benefits (e.g. the Earned Income Tax Credit and the Working Tax Credit) from causing a reduction in gross wages which would otherwise occur if labour supply is not perfectly inelastic .
• Provides a 'shock' which forces employers to use a high productivity strategy rather than a high labour turnover strategy, therefore improving the stock of Human Capital in an economy.
• Creates incentive to work (contrast with welfare transfer payments).
• Minimum wage is administratively simple; workers only need to report violations of wages less than minimum, minimizing a need for a large enforcement agency.

Costs

Opponents of the minimum wage claim it has these effects:

• Reduces demand for workers.This may manifest itself through a reduction in the number of hours worked by individuals, or through a reduction in the number of jobs .
• Reduces profit margins of business owners employing minimum wage workers.
• Increases prices for customers of employers of minimum wage workers, which would pass through to the general price level.
• Reduces economic growth by skewing factor-choice incentives away from the optimum choice.
• Decreases opportunities for low-skilled workers to gain the training and responsibility they need to move up the wage ladder
• Increases the cost of government social programs due to assistance programs aiding the laid-off workers
• Is less effective at reducing social exclusion than some other alternatives, for example training programs.
• Is less effective than the Earned Income Tax Credit at targeting the truly needy, and is more damaging to businesses .
• Decreases human capital by encouraging people to enter the job market instead of pursuing further education.
• Reduces the international competitiveness of a nation by raising the cost of factor inputs, and therefore output, relative to the level of other countries. It is argued that this is particularly problematic in developing economies .
• Is a limit on the freedom of both employers and employees. Minimum wage laws make it illegal for employers to pay workers less than the minimum wage. This also prevents workers from being able to provide labor or services for less than the minimum. For example, during the apartheid era in South Africa, white trade unions lobbied for the introduction of minimum wage laws so as to exclude black workers from the labor market. By preventing black workers from selling their labor for less than white workers, the black workers were prevented from competing for jobs held by whites. Although it is the employer who is fined and/or imprisoned for violations, the workers also lose their freedom, albeit indirectly.

The aforementioned arguments, both pro and con, are largely empirical in nature. That is, debate of these arguments centers on the application of data and analytic techniques. By contrast, debate of theoretical arguments (see below) center on the application of logical reasoning.

Recent trends in the U.S.

Some idea of the empirical problems of this debate can be seen by looking at recent trends in the United States. The minimum wage fell about 29% in real terms between 1979 and 2003. For the median worker, real hourly earnings have increased since 1979, however for the lowest deciles, there have been significant falls in the real wage without much fall in the rate of unemployment. Some argue that a declining minimum wage might reduce youth unemployment (since these workers are likely to have fewer skills than older workers).

Comparison of the minimum wage to unemployment among teenagers in the U.S. The data shown here indicate that increases in the minimum wage are associated with increases in unemployment among teenage workers.

Over all, there is no consensus between economists about the effects of minimum wages on youth employment, although empirical evidence suggests that this group is most vulnerable to too high minimum wages.

Scholarly articles

Views of Card and Krueger

The more common debate is on changes to minimum wages. This unified view was challenged by research done by David Card and Alan Krueger. In their 1997 book Myth and Measurement: The New Economics of the Minimum Wage (ISBN 0-691-04823-1), they argued the negative employment effects of minimum-wage laws to be minimal if not non-existent (at least for the United States). For example, they look at the 1992 increase in New Jersey's minimum wage, the 1988 rise in California's minimum wage, and the 1990-91 increases in the federal minimum wage. In each case, Card and Krueger present evidence ostensibly showing that increases in the minimum wage led to increases in pay, but no loss in jobs. That is, it appears that the demand for low-wage workers is inelastic. Also, these authors reexamine the existing literature on the minimum wage and argue that it, too, lacks support for the claim that a higher minimum wage cuts the availability of jobs.

Critics of this research, however, argue that their research was flawed. For example, Card and Krueger gathered their data by telephoning employers in Pennsylvania and New Jersey, asking them whether they intended to increase, decrease, or make no change in their employment. Subsequent attempts to verify the claims requested payroll cards from employers to verify employment, and ostensibly found that the minimum wage increases were followed by decreases in employment. On the other hand, an assessment of data collected and analysed by David Neumark and William Wascher, economists who are usually critical of minimum-wage increases, did not initially contradict the Card/Krueger results, but in a later edited version found that the same general sample set did increase unemployment. See Neumark Waschler, American Economic Review, Volume 90 No. 5.[2]

Another possible explanation on why minimum wage laws may not decrease unemployment in the United States is that the minimum wage is set close to the equilibrium point for low and unskilled workers, thus absent the minimum wage law and unskilled workers would be paid approximately the same amount. However, a dramatic increase above this equilibrium point would likely bring about increased unemployment for the low and unskilled workers.

Agreement with Card and Krueger

Since the introduction of a national minimum wage in the UK in 1999, its effects on employment were subject to extensive research and observation by the Low Pay Commission. The Low Pay Commission found that, rather than make employees redundant, employers have reduced their rate of hiring, reduced staff hours, increased prices, and have found ways to cause current workers to be more productive (especially service companies). Neither trade unions nor employer organisations contest the minimum wage, although especially the latter had done so heavily until 1999.

From the other side, some leading economists accept the Card/Krueger works and agree with their results [3].

Disagreement with Card and Krueger

The Joint Economic Committee (having at the time a Republican majority) of the United States Congress has been critical of Card and Krueger's work. They note that it conflicts with other studies done on minimum wage laws within the United States over the past 50 years. According to the JEC, minimum wage laws have been shown to cause large amounts of unemployment, especially among low-income, unskilled, black, and teenaged populations, as well as cause a host of other mal-effects, such as higher turnover, less training, and fewer fringe-benefits.

According to economists, Donald Deere (Texas A&M), Kevin Murphy (University of Chicago), and Finis Weltch (Texas A&M), the Card and Krueger study are contradicted by "common sense and past research." They conclude about the Card and Krueger research,

Each of the four studies examines a different piece of the minimum wage/employment relationship. Three of them consider a single state, and two of them look at only a handful of firms in one industry. From these isolated findings Card and Krueger paint a big picture wherein increased minimum wages do not decrease, and may increase, employment. Our view is that there is something wrong with this picture. Artificial increases in the price of unskilled laborers inevitably lead to their reduced employment; the conventional wisdom remains intact."

The importance of Card and Krueger's work does not necessarily lie in its empirical findings (which have been challenged by several studies more rigorous than Deere, Murphy and Weltch) but in its emphasis on the importance in recognising that theoretical economics is not incompatible with positive employment effects from the minimum wage.

Theoretical arguments

The traditional economic argument views the labor market as perfectly competitive. In perfectly competitive markets, the market price settles to the marginal value of the product. Therefore, under the perfect competition assumption, absent a minimum wage, workers are paid their marginal value. As is the case with all (binding) price floors, minimum wage laws are predicted to result in more people being willing to offer their labor for hire, but fewer employers wishing to hire labor. The result is a surplus of labor, or, in this case, unemployment.

An alternate view of the labor market has low-wage labor markets characterized as monopsonistic competition wherein buyers (employers) have significantly more market power than do sellers (workers). Such a case is a type of market failure and results in workers being paid less than their marginal value. Under the monoposonistic assumption, an appropriately set minimum wage could increase both wages and employment, with the optimal level being equal to the marginal productivity of labor. This view emphasizes the role of minimum wages as a market regulation policy akin to antitrust policies, as opposed to an illusory "free lunch" for low-wage workers. Detractors point out that no collusion between employers to keep wages low has ever been demonstrated, asserting that in most labor markets, demand meets supply, and it is only minimum wage laws and other market interference which cause the imbalance. However, it is important to note that collusion is not a pre-requisite for market power; segmented markets, information costs, imperfect mobility and the 'personal' element of labour markets all represent movements away from the idealised perfectly competitive labour market.

Policy Alternatives to the Minimum wage

The primary purpose of the minimum wage is to give higher income to low wage earners, but the minimum wage isn't the only policy that attempts to accomplish this goal. Several policy alternatives such as a negative income tax or earned income tax credit give benefits to low wage workers in a method that many economists believe is more economically efficient.[4]

Under a classical analysis of a minimum wage, some low wage earners are helped by the higher minimum wage, some low wage earners lose their jobs because of the higher minimum wage, and businesses employing low wage earners face higher labor costs. A benefit is delivered to some low wage workers at the expense of other low wage workers and businesses employing low wage workers.

On the other hand, a negative income tax or earned income tax credit benefits a broader population of low wage earners, and society as a whole bears the cost. This is more economically efficient because, a low tax rate on the broader economy causes less deadweight loss than a high tax rate on a small section of the economy.

See also

• 30 Days #1: Minimum Wage
• Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority
• Guaranteed minimum income
• Labor market
• Labour and employment law
• List of minimum wages by country
• List of U.S. state minimum wages
• Living wage
• Maximum wage
• Nickel and Dimed
• Positive rights
• Wage slave

External links

• ACORN Living Wage Resource Center
• Characteristics of Minimum Wage Workers: 2005 U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics
• Momentum builds for minimum-wage hike by The Christian Science Monitor
• Minimum Wage Issue Guide by the Economic Policy Institute
• [5] by Policy Matters Ohio
• EIROnline: Minimum wages in Europe
• Low Pay Commission in the United Kingdom
• UK Department of Trade and Industry - The National Minimum Wage
• U.S. Department of Labor statistics
• Raising the National Minimum Wage: Information, Opinion, Research
• Average U.S. farm and non-farm wages compared to the minimum wage (1981 - 2004)
• Impact of Proposed Minimum-Wage Increase on Low-income Families (PDF) Center for Economic and Policy Research (December 2005)
• Center for Policy Alternatives – Minimum Wage Policy Model
• Find It! By Topic: Wages: Minimum Wage U.S. Department of Labor
• Wagenet - Australian Working Conditions
• Measuring the Full Impact of Minimum and Living Wage Laws
• Economist Paul Krugman on Minimum Wage Regulation
• Economist Philip Lewis - Centre for Labour Market Research - on the relationship between unemployment and minimum wages
• Mythology of the Minimum Wage by DW MacKenzie - Mises Institute
• Minimum Wage Research, Studies and Resources by The Heritage Foundation
• Working at Cross Purposes by Gregory Mankiw, Professor of Economics at Harvard, on the Minimum Wage