Jump to content

User talk:Binksternet

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hangsun.577 (talk | contribs) at 19:47, 22 August 2020 (→Patrisse Cullors.: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Binksternet Articles created Significant contributor Images Did you know Awards

Plot size

Genuine apologies. I did not intend to do anything incorrect. I just happened to notice the plot literally covers the first five minutes of the film and none of the rest of the story (have a younger sister, seen the film a few times), and in that five minutes worth of plot given, there was a lot of incorrect information to boot. I only wished to put the correct plot story in. I tried to keep it as concise and actually left out several important plot points. I will be more careful in future, though. EEBuchanan (talk) 03:47, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to bother

I’ve asked for ANI advice to see if others have some ideas that may help. Meanwhile could you have a look at the recent pointy edits in Patrisse Cullors early life section? Feels like an end run to me. Gleeanon409 (talk) 06:06, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disco (Kylie Minogue album)

I wondered if you wouldn't mind giving your opinion at the following redirection discussion Talk:Kylie_Minogue#Too_early_for_Disco_album ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 10:54, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Victoria was born in 1989

Victoria was born in 1989. Sources are her own social media account, high school year book, MyLife etc.

https://twitter.com/VictoriaMonet/status/12803152707?s=20

https://twitter.com/VictoriaMonet/status/13641882103?s=20

https://old-friends.co/class.php?s=54563&c=2007 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.70.68.80 (talk) 20:46, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

sholomo carlebach

Hi there ! I've created a talk page topic for discussion on sexual allegations in lead. Please feel free to make a case. kind regards Alexandre8 (talk) 21:35, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:LEAD is my case. Binksternet (talk) 21:36, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Swastika

Your opinion on Swastika is not the issue. The German Hakenkreuz is not the Swastika despite mis-translations. White privilege distortions do not alter the original. The Hakenkreuz is a Christian symbol, there is no evidence of Hitler ever using the term "Swastika." If there is present that. This kind of reversion has made Wikipedia into a platform for White supremacist views which do not take into account alternative readings. Puck42 (talk) 06:45, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In your edit to the Swastika article, you said that Nazis used the symbol to represent Christian Socialism. But Nazis were never socialist, not even a little bit. And they only paid lip service to Christianity. So the Nazis could not be using the hakenkreuz or swastika for the purpose you stated.
You used an article in Quartz as your source. The article does not say that the Nazis were Socialist or Christian. The author talks about T.K. Nakagaki, a Buddhist monk who wants to clean up the bad reputation of the swastika and reclaim it for good purposes. Nakagaki writes in his book that Hitler chose to use the symbol with his new interpretation and for his own political purpose. So whatever history was associated with the hakenkreuz or swastika was trampled to make the Nazi symbol. Which means it doesn't really matter what symbol he started with. Binksternet (talk) 07:32, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Happys - band/movie

The Happys was formed prior to your movie sir. This is not going away I promise only getting started. TheHappys123 (talk) 08:30, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not my movie.
It's a fine thing to promote a band, but on Wikipedia, bands must be famous enough to satisfy the requirements at WP:NBAND.
You've got this piece in the Marin IJ, a local paper, this piece in the Bohemian, another small paper. You need something larger writing about the band. Or a charting release.
And if the band had its own page on Wikipedia, it would be The Happys (band), not The Happys which is an article about a film. Binksternet (talk) 08:39, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me out do you have an email, I’d like help with this the band has a lot of noteriety, I apologize about the mix up, I think you understand I misunderstood who you were at first, and apologize. The manager of the Happys is a big time manager of Tahoe artists who has managed blink 182, sublime, skankin pickle, three non blondes, monophonics, can we settle on the Happys band on Wikipedia sir. Cheers!! Thank you again excuse the mixup. I read through the criteria a bunch of times and have come to the conclusion that the over grains of sand and awards won by the band, add up to fulfillment’s required of a page, of you dig up articles. Please message me at best convenience. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheHappys123 (talk • contribs) 09:33, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Genres of ...Baby One More Time ( and Backstreet boys

Hi Binksternet, You have reverted my edit on Britney Spears' debut album, referring it as "disruptive editing". However some sites mention the album of her genre as Trip hop and not teen pop. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raptorz12 (talk • contribs) 09:54, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Back in the High Life

On 7 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Back in the High Life, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that John "JR" Robinson (pictured) kicked off the Steve Winwood album Back in the High Life with a drum solo he played on his own drum kit at Unique Recording Studios in New York? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Back in the High Life. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Back in the High Life), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:01, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User:Binksternet: Thank you so much for your work on this and the two DYKs below. Work like this makes Wikipedia an absolute joy to read. —  AjaxSmack  00:17, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
What a heart-warming compliment! Thanks backatcha. Binksternet (talk) 00:44, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Congrats buddy. Was happy to see this today isento (talk) 03:35, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You, too! Your contributions helped build the thing up. Binksternet (talk) 05:04, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Unique Recording Studios

On 7 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Unique Recording Studios, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that John "JR" Robinson (pictured) kicked off the Steve Winwood album Back in the High Life with a drum solo he played on his own drum kit at Unique Recording Studios in New York? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Unique Recording Studios), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:01, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for John Robinson (drummer)

On 7 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John Robinson (drummer), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that John "JR" Robinson (pictured) kicked off the Steve Winwood album Back in the High Life with a drum solo he played on his own drum kit at Unique Recording Studios in New York? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, John Robinson (drummer)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Asdidis ?

Hello ,I remember that you were quite successful in discovering multiple harmful IPs. And that there was a problematic user named Asdidis who did multiple vandalism from different IP adresses, so I am asking can this IP be a typical behaviour from that user? So as you can see there were several changes on Drazen Petrovic article [[1]] where IP: 93.142.66.189 not only changed article but also left discriminating comments against several users including myself on my talk page and also on Novak Djokovic talk page on current RFC, in the meantime he was blocked and I changed the article back to it's original state, minute after the article was reveresed from the other similar IP address :93.136.98.167 .Can you please check on it when you have some extra time. Thank you.-Theonewithreason (talk) 16:43, 07 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I will look. Binksternet (talk) 17:21, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edd Kalehoff edits

Hi Binksternet,

I've been collecting television music for over 20 years and noticed your edits to Edd's page are not exactly right. I've talked with parties involved first hand pertaining to the Price is Right rights fiasco. Here's exactly what happened, feel free to make your edit correct according to this if you like, even though I understand some guy on Wikipedia without an account telling you "I know stuff because I talked to them!" isn't really a great source.

Edd composes the Price is Right main theme and two other reels of music (the Moog reel and Reel 1) in 1972 as he's still signed to Score Productions. Robert Israel, head of Score Productions decides to change the composer credit on BMI to his wife's name Sheila Cole. While the show airs with only Edds name as the composer, BMI is different making it so only Fremantle (then Mark Goodson Productions) and Sheila Cole get money from the main theme. At this point Edd realizes the problems and goes directly to Mark Goodson who realizes the problems, while they can't change the main composer credit they do give him credit for all other cues used besides the main theme. After that, Edd left Score and went on to go solo composing other themes. "Price" is not the only theme that had been stolen, while it is the most widely known Israel also stole the credits for Card Sharks, Wimbledon, and others, and as well stole from other composers, not just Edd. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:601:CE7F:4000:90A0:1BED:A69A:14DD (talk) 06:27, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good to know, thanks for the info. Now I can look around for published stuff that supports what you are saying. Binksternet (talk) 06:30, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXII, August 2020

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:29, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you Message me on my Talk page?

Hi there I don't even know you Why did you Message me on my Talk page? i have already apologize to you okay.

Thanks JukeboxMan1990 (talk) 3:52 10 August 2020 (UTC)

UK telegraph FA

It's been some time since you left comments at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Electrical telegraphy in the United Kingdom/archive1. Thanks for doing that, but would you now please revisit this, look at my responses, and either declare your support for promotion to FA or say why my replies are inadequate. Your support is needed to get this promoted. SpinningSpark 00:02, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive Editing

Hi. I'm not quite sure why you have accused me of disruptive editing. Right above the Track Listing on both pages in question (Genesis (Busta Rhymes album) and Juve the Great), I have clearly cited the album's liner notes, so I don't know why you are claiming that I am adding unsourced content. I noticed that you removed the Sample Credits sections from both pages. I got this information from the Album's Liner notes, which I have already sourced earlier in the article. Should I add this source again next to the Sample Credits section?

I assure you that I am only trying to add real information to the page, and I have no intention of causing any disruptions. If you could kindly explain to me what I am doing wrong, I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks for your time. Stellar420 (talk) 04:30, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

At the Genesis album page, you said that "'As I Come Back' contains replayed elements from 'Scenario (Remix)' by A Tribe Called Quest featuring Leaders of the New School." That does not appear at all in the liner notes. Binksternet (talk) 04:42, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Genesis – here's a link to images of the Album Booklet. For your convenience, here is the specific page in question – [2]. It clearly says "contains replayed elements from "Scenario (Remix)". Sure, I added in the Artist, but the song is there, so saying that it "does not appear at all in the liner notes" doesn't help me understand what I'm doing wrong. If you could be more specific, that would be great. Not trying to be rude or anything, just trying to understand. Thanks again.Stellar420 (talk) 05:06, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You're right! I didn't see that tucked in there so small, and I was looking for Tribe Called Quest. Binksternet (talk) 23:42, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Undoing all that work those different people did

And your a giant nerd for undoing all that hard work those people did on those Wikipedia's pages it's bull crap so piss off Jjwalker130 (talk) 23:32, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the love. Feel ya later. Binksternet (talk) 23:40, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, my. Heh-heh. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 22:22, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

V-pop

Hello - he's a busy little fellow isn't he ! (see [3] As an unregistered user there's little I can do other than revert. Perhaps you can do more ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.174.124.67 (talk) 21:00, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Malibu Mafia

Hello! Your submission of Malibu Mafia at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:39, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nice find

I just wanted to say nice find on that extra info about the connection between Association for Behavior Analysis International and the Judge Rotenberg Center. I thought my research was thorough, but I totaly missed that.

The Detective Barnstar
For excellent research and the finding of an obscure fact. 68.45.46.177 (talk) 03:04, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

. --68.45.46.177 (talk) 03:04, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rock on! Keep fighting the good fight. Binksternet (talk) 03:19, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hounding

I can't help but thinking that you're trying to get back at me for our disagreement at White privilege. You edited Letters from a Farmer in Pennsylvania for the first time ([4]) just 7 minutes after replying to me at Talk:White privilege ([5]). I think you looked at my contribution history and then decided to confront me at an unrelated page, which is WP:HOUNDING. -Thucydides411 (talk) 19:47, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My goal is to improve Wikipedia. I saw your assertions at Talk:White privilege which made me wonder whether your contrary attitude was making Wikipedia worse in other ways than that talk page. I saw you had recently created an article about a topic familar to me, and I checked to see whether it was covering the bases. I saw it was missing the important aspect of slavery, so I added that. I did not "confront" you. Binksternet (talk) 20:05, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
What you're describing is hounding. You had a dispute with me at White privilege, so you started going through my contribution history. Trying to shoehorn a bunch of material about Dickinson's ownership of slaves into Letters from a Farmer in Pennsylvania, directly after disagreeing with me at White privilege, is a bit too on-the-nose. Don't damage a historical article just to make a point. -Thucydides411 (talk) 20:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Bink keeping an eye out is very much to the good. And having a quick looksee at Thuce's diffs is kind of fish in a barrel. Bad edits and bludgeons hurt the Project. It is no secret that many editors share that view. It's not hounding. It's good citizenship. Thank you, Binksternet. SPECIFICO talk 20:11, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
SPECIFICO also has a history of stalking me on Wikipedia. They've shown up at articles as random as NEOCam to revert my edits. -Thucydides411 (talk) 20:19, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the support, SPECIFICO. We've tangled in the past and I respect your viewpoint. Binksternet (talk) 20:24, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Who is damaging the article? I was looking at university published books which were not represented. You had not found them, for whatever reason, and I was filling the gap. That's not "damage", that's how we get a better encyclopedia. Binksternet (talk) 20:24, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You're searching Google Books specifically to find books that mention the subject you want to add. That's very different from reviewing the literature and determining which subjects to cover based on the weight they receive in the sources. But regardless, please stop hounding me. I don't go through your edit history and find pages to confront you on, and I would consider that a low thing to do. -Thucydides411 (talk) 20:28, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I acknowledge your request to "stop hounding" you, though I wasn't doing that, and I will be working the new material into the Letters article if you don't do it yourself. Let's see what you do in the next couple of days, to incorporate the literature which you had previously not seen. Binksternet (talk) 20:43, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm working off of general literature on the subject, not off of a cherry-picked list chosen to emphasize slavery. "Barack Obama: American Historian" is not among the most relevant works on Dickinson's Letters. The page leaves a lot of aspects of the letters out, including his comparison of lack of taxation to slavery (which is something that an expanded article could mention). But Dickinson's ownership of slaves is not discussed in connection with the Letters in any of the general sources I've been using. -Thucydides411 (talk) 20:51, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It sounds like I will be working on it myself then. See you in a few days, unless you find the energy. Binksternet (talk) 21:02, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This is not appropriate behavior on Wikipedia. WP:HOUNDING is policy, and you shouldn't be adding material to pages just to get back at editors you've had disagreements with. -Thucydides411 (talk) 21:10, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ri-i-ight. Instead of me helping to expand your newly created article, you would rather have no help at all because you don't want the article to reflect the literature. You would rather have the article present a myth of your choosing, narrowly focusing on the aspects that are pleasant to you. Binksternet (talk) 21:16, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The article is 10 years old, and I didn't ask for you to stalk me. -Thucydides411 (talk) 21:31, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
None of that is an assurance that you understand the article is lacking in coverage. Binksternet (talk) 21:56, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thuce, you need to consider your words very carefully. A peace-loving editor's talk page is no place for aspersions and false accusations. That is the stuff of ANI. SPECIFICO talk 23:27, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Patrisse Cullors.

You wrote as a response to my edit: "Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Patrisse Cullors. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia."

I cited PolitiFact, a verifiable and credible source and you allege that I am violating Wikipedia's "neutral point of view policy?" This is incorrect. The bias comes from you disagreeing with something she is on the record stating in public. I provided a credible source.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Binksternet&oldid=974397826"