Jump to content

User talk:185.69.144.244

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 185.69.144.244 (talk) at 12:34, 22 September 2020 (→‎September 2020). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Information icon Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 20:19, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to VfB Stuttgart has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:19, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Abraham's family tree has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:55, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Information icon Hello, I'm Crystallizedcarbon. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to First English Civil War— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 11:04, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to First English Civil War. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 11:04, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Information icon Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Template:Z192 David J Johnson (talk) 10:24, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
No way. Absolutely NOT. 185.69.144.244 (talk) 10:25, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Template:Z188 DoebLoggs (talk) 10:28, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Glen (talk) 10:30, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

185.69.144.244 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Unblock me AT ONCE! I am VERY ANGRY about this

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:11, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

185.69.144.244 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

How can I possibly get unblocked then because I don't understand what I did wrong, or why I was blocked, and don't agree with it. I was not causing damage or disruption, merely expressing myself as is my right under freedom of speech. I agree that my edits weren't necessarily useful, but I can't make constructive contributions instead of disruptive ones if my edits weren't disruptive in the first place! VERY ANGRY ABOUT THIS

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=How can I possibly get unblocked then because I don't understand what I did wrong, or why I was blocked, and don't agree with it. I was not causing damage or disruption, merely expressing myself as is my right under freedom of speech. I agree that my edits weren't necessarily useful, but I can't make constructive contributions instead of disruptive ones if my edits weren't disruptive in the first place! VERY ANGRY ABOUT THIS |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=How can I possibly get unblocked then because I don't understand what I did wrong, or why I was blocked, and don't agree with it. I was not causing damage or disruption, merely expressing myself as is my right under freedom of speech. I agree that my edits weren't necessarily useful, but I can't make constructive contributions instead of disruptive ones if my edits weren't disruptive in the first place! VERY ANGRY ABOUT THIS |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=How can I possibly get unblocked then because I don't understand what I did wrong, or why I was blocked, and don't agree with it. I was not causing damage or disruption, merely expressing myself as is my right under freedom of speech. I agree that my edits weren't necessarily useful, but I can't make constructive contributions instead of disruptive ones if my edits weren't disruptive in the first place! VERY ANGRY ABOUT THIS |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:185.69.144.244&oldid=979727552"