Jump to content

Talk:Lum's

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mulp (talk | contribs) at 04:16, 25 October 2020. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconFood and drink: Foodservice Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Related taskforces:
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Foodservice task force.
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
Food and Drink task list:
To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:
Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Fair use rationale for Image:LUMS.jpg

Image:LUMS.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:11, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:LUMS.jpg

Image:LUMS.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:08, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FOOD Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Restaurants or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. You can find the related request for tagging here -- TinucherianBot (talk) 10:16, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removing this here

Unsourced and improperly formatted. If someone wants to verify its accuracy, cite the source, reformat and reinsert, please do. 12.233.146.130 (talk) 19:31, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Remaining Lums restaurants:
- 511 N. Fort Crook Road, Bellevue, Nebraska.
- 4125 SW 64th Avenue, Davie, Florida.




I don't know the protocol around here, but I do know that I was at the Lums in Davie on Saturday (6/27/09) and saw that they were closing the restaurant on 6/28/09 and that it would eventually reopen as the "Flashback Diner". I don't want to add an extra egg for 50 cents at the Flashback Diner. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.149.7.114 (talk) 13:37, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lum's, Lums, or LUMS?

Does anyone know when Lum's became Lums or LUMS? I suspect it was when Wienerwald bought the restaurants from John Y. Brown, but I've not yet been able to verify that. If you can find a reference, let me know. --Chuckhoffmann (talk) 23:05, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It was apparently originally "Lum's", and later rendered as "LUMS". -- Infrogmation (talk) 18:06, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It was LUMS by 1970 as I remember going there often. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.179.106.220 (talk) 17:32, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved the page to "Lum's". Reasons: 1)Period photo signage shows was actual name, at least in early decades. 2)Seems unambiguous; no non-relevent links to "Lum's". 3)Avoids creating parenthetical neologism with no history of actual usage outside of Wikipedia. -- Infrogmation (talk) 18:10, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Lums" in Seekonk, MA

Based on online reviews, it appears that the Lums in Seekonk is unrelated to the subject of this article, LUMS. The Seekonk restaurant is some local mom & pop place for roast beef and seafood: nothing from the chain, different decor, and totally different menu. No Ollie Burgers or anything like that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.179.106.220 (talk) 17:31, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ollie Burger

No mention of the Ollie Burger? From memory, Ollie's was a burger stand in Miami that became something of a local legend. Lum's bought out the secret recipe in the early 1970s and started serving their version in the chain restaurants (which didn't always live up to the original). -- Infrogmation (talk) 21:48, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For some reason, this popped into my head, the burger I loved at Lums. Lumberger? No... thanks, for reminding me it was the Ollie Burger.

Here's the/a story https://ollieburgerspices.com/history Mulp (talk) 04:16, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lum's. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:27, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]