User talk:Pfarla

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

Pfarla, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Pfarla! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Missvain (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:21, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ceuta has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ceuta was changed by Pfarla (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.917784 on 2015-09-03T17:55:38+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:55, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Because of your recent edit warring on multiple articles, including Climate of Europe and Iberian Peninsula, as well as violations of the non-free content policy by adding non-free images to articles without creating the required fair use rationales for each usage, I've blocked your account for 24 hours. If you believe this block to be in error, you may follow the process outlined at Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:27, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Juliancolton: Thanks for showing me the true face of Wikipedia and the kind of Cosa Nostra who administrate this. I'm ashamed of myself that I gave 10€ to Wikipedia. One user is doing any kind of changes he wants against the word of 3 users and you block me for EDIT WARRING? Me? The one who agrees with other 2 users against one? Ok then, thanks. I think I will never edit again in this website. This is too much of a dictatorship. You don't even follow your own rules, no one made a consensus with him but you agree with him. Thanks, really thanks! --Pfarla (talk) 03:30, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I hope that you don't leave but that is your choice. As I've already mentioned before at files for discussion. Wikipedia is not a democracy and consensus for what I did is well established in the non-free content guideline, the fair use rationale guideline, and the fair use criteria policy. That is where the consensus is coming from and copyright policy is a really really big deal here. Three people at FFD does not override years of community consensus that is the way it is for specific legal reasons regarding copyright. I didn't have a choice but to enforce it and I tried to get you to stop. I hope that we can solve this amicably. I would be happy to explain our copyright policies to you if you want. --Majora (talk) 03:43, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spain

@Pfarla: Please user Pfarla take good faith in my edits, I didnt wanted to delete Spain as " Cultural superpower", the sources before have talked about only " cultural power" no "Super power". LuigiPortaro29 (talk) 21:44, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@LuigiPortaro29: one of the sources is adressing as a cultural superpower for the influence in the whole American continent starting in the southern US all the way down to the end of South America.

I've also seen that other user has been discussing this with you and reaches finally a consensus with Spain remaining there, and many months later you deleted it for no reason and breaking the last consensus about that topic. Why? Regards. --Pfarla (talk) 07:39, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Pfarla: Hello Pfarla sorry if I have deleted Spain from the list , maybe I didn't see in a right way the source?, well , I agree with you about the term of Cultural Superpower, Spanish language is one of the key of the Spanish success!.Regards!.LuigiPortaro29 (talk) 11:57, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andorra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spanish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Warning about your recent edits in 2 different pages.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of European countries by average wage, you may be blocked from editing. Template:Z188

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of countries by average wage, you may be blocked from editing. Template:Z188

Please stop making disruptive edits inserting invented data such as in List of European countries by average wage and removing the official order such as in the page List of countries by average wage. You have been warned in the page of a Wikipedia librarian and you still continue to do the same changes even if they're clearly disruptive. You have already broken also Wikipedia:Three-revert rule in the page List of European countries by average wage so try to prove your data to reach a consensus before you do further edits, eitherwise I will have to elevate this message to a real report against vandalism.Giolocam (talk) 01:35, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]