User talk:Arglebargle79

Hi Arglebargle79! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:23, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Trump tweet

Heads up – Trump just tweeted about your latest edit to Matthew W. Brann. It has since been reverted and restored with better wording, but I thought you should know. – bradv🍁 05:40, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Bradv: Cool!!!!!...Better wording is never objectionable to me, thanks for the heads up!Arglebargle79 (talk) 13:23, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 16: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC

December 16, 7pm: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page.

We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person!

This month will include a discussion of the sixth annual Community Wishlist Survey, an opportunity for editors and other community members to submit proposals for fixes and features you'd like the Wikimedia Foundation's tech team to address. As always, it's the agenda anyone can edit, so please feel free to add any projects you'd like to share.

Wednesday December 16 WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC (optional RSVP on-wiki).

7:00pm - 8:00 pm online via Zoom (optional breakout rooms from 8:00-8:30)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 01:54, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Electoral Count Act have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. I have reverted this edit. I see no support for the assertion in the source cited, and your characterization of such certificates as "counterfeit " is both inaccurate WP:POV.Template:Z186 Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 14:40, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Even worse POV edits have been made by you on Attempts to overturn the 2020 United States presidential election. This is deeply concerning behaviour. I urge you to not make any edits that are likely to be reverted for neutrality purposes. Onetwothreeip (talk) 22:15, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Letting you know I asked for an admin to take a look at your comment on the talk page. Onetwothreeip (talk) 21:10, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

This and this are beyond the pale for discussing living persons. Please turn your rhetoric way, way, way down, or you are likely to end up with a topic ban from modern American politics. —valereee (talk) 18:25, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The question was, did she do it and was it appropriate?Arglebargle79 (talk) 18:41, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, that is not the question. The question is What are reliable sources saying? —valereee (talk) 20:02, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Arglebargle79. For goodness sake STOP, just STOP :( GoodDay (talk) 20:41, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, @GoodDay:, Did the GSA Administrator refuse to sign the asertainment papers for two weeks and delay the cooperation between Biden transition and the administration? Arglebargle79 (talk) 00:15, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've tried to help you, but to no avail :( GoodDay (talk) 00:21, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did she or not? I'm serious. That's the question.Arglebargle79 (talk) 00:36, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Izno (talk) 02:53, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]