Talk:Hawker 800

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was

Old Merge suggestion

Agree with merge. Akradecki 01:24, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I also agree. This article should be merged with the HS125 entry and the "Raytheon" lable dropped. user:el-dodo

I agree too - the aircraft is the same, just that it has experienced name changes due to different manufacturers over the years.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

New Merge discussion

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus for merge at this time, after nearlay 4 months of an open poll. - BillCJ (talk) 00:29, 27 April 2008 (UTC) I also agree - it's confusing to have both entries. Does anyone know how to tag with merge? Jddriessen (talk) 16:41, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - This article covers development since Hawker's purchase by Raytheon, and covers the new models such as the 800XP, 850XP, and the even newer 750 and 900. It would be far more confusing to have thes models covered under the BAe 125 page, especially since the company has changed ownership again. It's not unusual to split sub-variants off to there own pages, and that is basically what this page is. This page does need updating and expansion, however. - BillCJ (talk) 17:23, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too. The change of ownership and concurrent upgrades makes seperate articles justified in my opinion. Whale plane (talk) 17:30, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bill has said it all - Adrian Pingstone (talk) 15:36, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The Hawker 800 is a product name of a sub variety of the BAe 125 800 series. It was a marketing exercise by British Aerospace to incorporate thrust reversers to the basic 125 800 for the American market. I feel the Hawker 800 should be merged with an article on the BAe 125 800. There should be a further article on the Hawker 800XP and its sub varients. Wbarnato (talk) 19:27, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chief designer

Please stop removing the reference to Malcol Bowd not being the designer. In Bill Gunstons book it mentions he was the chief designer of the Hawker 800Xp on page 126. I agree he became the project leader of the Hawker Horizon - but that is a different article! Wbarnato (talk) 13:16, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Designer field is only for aircraft where one, or perhaps two, people designed the whole aircraft by themselves. It's not appropriate for project heads, chief designers, or whatever term they went by, where a person was the head of a design team, as with most modern aircraft. This is per the notes at Template:Infobox aircraft type. Thanks for understanding. - BilCat (talk) 17:45, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hawker 800. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:28, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]