Revision as of 22:09, 27 November 2018

WP:ARC

Requests for arbitration

Request name	Motions	Initiated	Votes
Jytdog		27 November 2018	0/0/0

[edit]

Open cases

Case name	Links	Evidence due	Prop. Dec. due
Venezuelan politics	(t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t)	20 Apr 2024	04 May 2024

[edit]

Recently closed cases (Past cases)

Case name	Closed
Conflict of interest management	13 Apr 2024
Mzajac	7 May 2024

Clarification and Amendment requests

Request name	Motions	Case	Posted
Amendment request: Conduct in deletion-related editing	none	(orig. case)	30 April 2024
Clarification request: Palestine-Israel articles 4	none	(orig. case)	13 May 2024
Amendment request: Article titles and capitalisation	none	(orig. case)	13 May 2024

Arbitrator motions

No arbitrator motions are currently open.

Shortcuts

Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority).

Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests.

Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace.

To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment.

File an arbitration request

This page is for statements, not discussion.

If you must reply to another user's statement, do so in your own section (more information).
Your section must not contain more than 500 words (Word Count Tool; internal gadget). This includes your replies to other users. To request an extension, either make the request in your statement section or email the clerks email list.
Arbitrators or clerks may refactor or delete statements, eg off-topic or unproductive remarks, without warning.
Banned users may request arbitration via the committee contact page; don't try to edit this page.
Under no circumstances should you remove requests from this page, or open a case (even for accepted requests), unless you are an arbitrator or clerk.
After a request is filed, the arbitrators will vote on accepting or declining the case. The <0/0/0> tally counts the arbitrators voting accept/decline/recuse.
Declined case requests are logged at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Declined requests. Accepted case requests are opened as cases, and logged at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Cases once closed.

Jytdog

Initiated by - TNT ^💖 at 22:09, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Involved parties

There'sNoTime (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA), filing party
Jytdog (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
BD2412 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)

Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request

[diff of notification Jytdog]
[diff of notification BD2412]

Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried

N/A

Statement by There'sNoTime

I don't enjoy arbitration cases, let alone the process of filing one - I'll make this short and to the point. Jytdog has acted in a grossly inappropriate manner, as described at Wikipedia talk:Harassment#Off-wiki contact, and I believe this falls short of our harassment policy. I don't enjoy blocking editors, and having Jytdog unable to edit the project will be a loss, but something needs to be done, as our unwillingness or weak actions give the message that we don't care, and that behaviour like this is acceptable.

I blocked Jytdog indefinitely per their previous blocks. This block was reduced to 24 hours by BD2412, citing a first offence. I don't think this is the case because of the previous Oversight and ArbCom Block which involved private information. As this case involves information which administrators who are not functionaries cannot access, it is explicitly within ArbCom's remit.

(I don't think that BD2412 did against policy here, but as they reduced the initial block, I'm adding them as a party and ArbCom can keep or remove them.)

I ask ArbCom to review Jytdog's history with off-wiki issues and to take any action as they deem necessary.

Thank you for your time - TNT ^💖 22:09, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Statement by Jytdog

Statement by BD2412

Statement by {Non-party}

Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.

Jytdog: Clerk notes

This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).

Jytdog: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0>

Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 <noinclude>{{ArbComOpenTasks|acotstyle=float:right}}</noinclude>{{NOINDEX}}
 {{Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=45%</noinclude>}}
+== Jytdog ==
+'''Initiated by ''' - [[User:There'sNoTime|TNT]] <sup>[[User talk:There'sNoTime|💖]]</sup> '''at''' 22:09, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
+=== Involved parties ===
+<!-- Please change "userlinks" to "admin" if the party is an administrator -->
+*{{admin|There'sNoTime}}, ''filing party''
+*{{userlinks|Jytdog}}
+*{{admin|BD2412}}
+;Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
+<!-- All parties must be notified that the request has been filed, immediately after it is posted, and confirmation posted here. -->
+*[diff of notification Jytdog]
+*[diff of notification BD2412]
+;Confirmation that other steps in [[Wikipedia:dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] have been tried
+* N/A
+=== Statement by There'sNoTime ===
+I don't enjoy arbitration cases, let alone the process of filing one - I'll make this short and to the point. {{noping|Jytdog}} has acted in a grossly inappropriate manner, as described at [[Wikipedia talk:Harassment#Off-wiki contact]], and I believe this falls short of our harassment policy. I don't enjoy blocking editors, and having Jytdog unable to edit the project will be a loss, but ''something needs to be done'', as our unwillingness or weak actions give the message that we don't care, and that behaviour like this is acceptable.
+I blocked Jytdog indefinitely per their [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&action=view&page=Jytdog&type=block previous blocks]. This block was reduced to 24 hours by {{noping|BD2412}}, citing a first offence. I don't think this is the case because of the previous Oversight and ArbCom Block which involved private information. As this case involves information which administrators who are not functionaries cannot access, it is explicitly within ArbCom's remit.
+(I don't think that BD2412 did against policy here, but as they reduced the initial block, I'm adding them as a party and ArbCom can keep or remove them.)
+I ask ArbCom to review Jytdog's history with off-wiki issues and to take any action as they deem necessary.
+Thank you for your time - [[User:There'sNoTime|TNT]] <sup>[[User talk:There'sNoTime|💖]]</sup> 22:09, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
+=== Statement by Jytdog ===
+=== Statement by BD2412 ===
+=== Statement by {Non-party} ===
+Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.
+<!-- * Please copy this section for the next person. * -->
+=== Jytdog: Clerk notes ===
+:''This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).''
+*
+=== Jytdog: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0> ===
+{{anchor|1=Jytdog: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter}}<small>Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)</small>
+*