Eclipse of Reason (Horkheimer): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Tags: Reverted Visual edit
Undid revision 1215000577 by KronosAlight (talk)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Eclipse of Reason'' (Horkheimer)}}
{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Eclipse of Reason'' (Horkheimer)}}
{{Infobox book
{{Infobox book
| name = Eclipse of Reason
| name = Eclipse of Reason
| title_orig = Zur Kritik der instrumentellen Vernunft
| title_orig =
| translator =
| translator =
| image = File:Horkheimer - Eclipse of Reason.jpeg
| image = File:Horkheimer - Eclipse of Reason.jpeg
| caption = Cover of the first edition
| caption = Cover of the first edition
| author = [[Max Horkheimer]]
| author = [[Max Horkheimer]]
| illustrator =
| illustrator =
| cover_artist =
| cover_artist =
| country = [[The Netherlands]]
| country =
| language = [[German (language)|German]]
| language =
| subject = [[Philosophy]]
| series =
| publisher = [[Querido Verlag]]
| subject =
| media_type = Print
| publisher = [[Oxford University Press]]
| preceded_by =
| pub_date = 1947
| followed_by =
| media_type = Print
| published = 1947
| pages =
| isbn =
| english_pub_date = 1947 ([[Oxford University Press]])
| dewey=
| congress=
| oclc=
| preceded_by =
| followed_by =
}}
}}
{{Frankfurt School}}
{{Frankfurt School}}
'''''Eclipse of Reason''''' is a 1947 book by [[Max Horkheimer]], in which the author discusses how the [[Nazi]]s were able to project their agenda as "reasonable",<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://filer.case.edu/ngb2/Authors/Horkheimer.html |title=Max Horkheimer |access-date=2011-03-10 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100112072212/http://filer.case.edu/ngb2/Authors/Horkheimer.html |archive-date=2010-01-12 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref name="litencyc">{{cite web|url=http://www.litencyc.com/php/sworks.php?UID=16370&rec=true|title=Literary Encyclopedia &#124; Eclipse of Reason|publisher=litencyc.com|accessdate=2015-05-14}}</ref> but also identifies the [[pragmatism]] of [[John Dewey]] as problematic, due to his emphasis on the instrumental dimension of reasoning.
'''''Eclipse of Reason''''' (German: ''Zur Kritik der instrumentellen Vernunft'') is a 1947 book by [[Germans|German]] philosopher [[Max Horkheimer]], a prominent figure in the [[Frankfurt School]] of [[critical theory]]. In the book, Horkheimer argues that the concept of reason has been reduced to a mere instrument for achieving practical goals, rather than a means of understanding objective truth. He contends that this "[[Instrumental and value rationality|instrumentalization]]" of reason, a means of efficiently achieving subjective ends without considering larger moral purposes, has led to the rise of [[authoritarianism]], a decline of individual autonomy, and the erosion of moral values in modern society.

He argued that this narrow, subjective rationality had become a dominant ideology, eclipsing the [[Age of Enlightenment|Enlightenment's]] original emancipatory vision of reason as a force for expanding human freedom and potential. Horkheimer called for reviving this broader conception of reason guided by substantive human values and social interests.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://filer.case.edu/ngb2/Authors/Horkheimer.html |title=Max Horkheimer |access-date=2011-03-10 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100112072212/http://filer.case.edu/ngb2/Authors/Horkheimer.html |archive-date=2010-01-12 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref name="litencyc">{{cite web|url=http://www.litencyc.com/php/sworks.php?UID=16370&rec=true|title=Literary Encyclopedia &#124; Eclipse of Reason|publisher=litencyc.com|accessdate=2015-05-14}}</ref>


==Summary==
==Summary==

Revision as of 14:56, 22 March 2024

Eclipse of Reason
Cover of the first edition
AuthorMax Horkheimer
PublisherOxford University Press
Publication date
1947
Media typePrint

Eclipse of Reason is a 1947 book by Max Horkheimer, in which the author discusses how the Nazis were able to project their agenda as "reasonable",[1][2] but also identifies the pragmatism of John Dewey as problematic, due to his emphasis on the instrumental dimension of reasoning.

Summary

Horkheimer deals with the concept of reason within the history of western philosophy.[3] He defines true reason as rationality,[3] which can only be fostered in an environment of free, critical thinking. He details the difference between objective, subjective and instrumental reason, and states that we have moved from the former through the center and into the latter (though subjective and instrumental reason are closely connected). Objective reason deals with universal truths that dictate that an action is either right or wrong. It is a concrete concept, and a force in the world that requires specific modes of behavior. The focus in the objective faculty of reason is on the ends, rather than the means. Subjective reason is an abstract concept of reason, and focuses primarily on means. Specifically, the reasonable nature of the purpose of action is irrelevant - the ends only serve the purpose of the subject (generally self-advancement or preservation). To be "reasonable" in this context is to be suited to a particular purpose, to be "good for something else". This aspect of reason is universally conforming, and easily furnishes ideology. In instrumental reason, the sole criterion of reason is its operational value or purposefulness, and with this, the idea of truth becomes contingent on mere subjective preference (hence the relation with subjective reason).

Horkheimer argues that modern philosophy has increasingly advocated subjective rationality to the point of rejecting any form of meaning or objective rationality and enabling technocracy. He associates the decline in objective rationality in philosophy with a mechanical worldview, disenchantment and the decline of a belief in a living or holistic nature. Although he denounces a wide range of contemporary philosophical schools of thought, Horkheimer asserts that these trends are epitomized in positivism, a term he defines broadly. [4]

Because subjective/instrumental reason rules, the ideals of a society, for example democratic ideals, become dependent on the "interests" of the people instead of being dependent on objective truths. Nevertheless, Horkheimer admits that objective reason has its roots in Reason ("Logos" in Greek) of the subject. He concludes,

If by enlightenment and intellectual progress we mean the freeing of man from superstitious belief in evil forces, in demons and fairies, in blind fate – in short, the emancipation from fear - then denunciation of what is currently called reason is the greatest service we can render.[5][6]

Influence

Horkheimer's argument in Eclipse of Reason that social repression demands the repression of the natural environment and of human nature influenced later developments in ecofeminism.[7]

Bibliography

  • Eclipse of Reason. Oxford University Press. 1947. ISBN 9781847144645. Eclipse of Reason.; reprint Continuum International Publishing Group, 2004, ISBN 978-0-8264-7793-4

References

  1. ^ "Max Horkheimer". Archived from the original on 2010-01-12. Retrieved 2011-03-10.
  2. ^ "Literary Encyclopedia | Eclipse of Reason". litencyc.com. Retrieved 2015-05-14.
  3. ^ a b "Home - Filer". filer.case.edu. Archived from the original on 2010-01-29. Retrieved 2015-05-14.
  4. ^ Josephson-Storm, Jason (2017). The Myth of Disenchantment: Magic, Modernity, and the Birth of the Human Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p. 244. ISBN 978-0-226-40336-6.
  5. ^ Eclipse of Reason, Seabury Press, 1974 (Originally 1941). P. 187
  6. ^ Horkheimer, Max (January 1974). Eclipse of Reason. ISBN 9780826400093.
  7. ^ Epstein, Barbara (1991). Political Protest and Cultural Revolution: Nonviolent Direct Action in the 1970s and 1980s. University of California Press. p. 177.