Nationalization: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Skabat169 (talk | contribs)
m →‎United States: reworked Amtrak explanation
Line 170: Line 170:
===United States===
===United States===
* All [[United States]] railroads were nationalized as the [[United States Railroad Administration]] during [[World War I]] as a wartime measure but were returned to their private owners almost immediately after the war.
* All [[United States]] railroads were nationalized as the [[United States Railroad Administration]] during [[World War I]] as a wartime measure but were returned to their private owners almost immediately after the war.
* The National Railroad Passenger Corporation ([[Amtrak]]) is a [[government-owned corporation]] created in 1971 for the express purpose of relieving American railroads of their legal obligation to provide [[inter-city rail]] service. They were trying to get out of this obligation anyway, but by taking over their passenger rail assets, Amtrak was able to keep the passenger trains running.
* The National Railroad Passenger Corporation ([[Amtrak]]) is a [[government-owned corporation]] created in 1971 for the express purpose of relieving American railroads of their legal obligation to provide [[inter-city rail|inter-city passenger rail]] service. The primarily Freight Railroads had petitioned to abandon passenger service repeatedly in decades leading up to Amtrak's formation.
* In 1976 the [[Consolidated Rail Corporation]] (Conrail), another government corporation, was created to take over the operations of six bankrupt rail lines operating primarily in the [[Northeastern United States]]; Conrail was privatized in 1987. Initial plans for Conrail would have made it a truly nationalized system like that during World War I, but an alternate proposal by the [[Association of American Railroads]] won out.
* In 1976 the [[Consolidated Rail Corporation]] (Conrail), another government corporation, was created to take over the operations of six bankrupt rail lines operating primarily in the [[Northeastern United States]]; Conrail was privatized in 1987. Initial plans for Conrail would have made it a truly nationalized system like that during World War I, but an alternate proposal by the [[Association of American Railroads]] won out.
* Organization of the [[Tennessee Valley Authority]] entailed the nationalization of the facilities of the former [[Tennessee Electric Power Company]] in 1939.
* Organization of the [[Tennessee Valley Authority]] entailed the nationalization of the facilities of the former [[Tennessee Electric Power Company]] in 1939.

Revision as of 21:03, 11 July 2008

Nationalization, also spelled nationalisation, is the act of taking an industry or assets into the public ownership of a national government. Nationalization usually refers to private assets, but may also mean assets owned by lower levels of government, such as municipalities. The opposite of nationalization is usually privatization or de-nationalisation, but may also be municipalization. A renationalization occurs when state-owned assets are privatized and later nationalized again, often when a different political party or faction is in power. A renationalization process may also be called reverse privatization.

The motives for nationalization are political as well as economic. It is a central theme of certain brands of 'state socialist' policy that the means of production, distribution and exchange, should be owned by the state. Socialists believe that public ownership enables people to exercise full democratic control over the means whereby they earn their living and provides an effective means of redistributing wealth and income more equitably.

Nationalized industries, charged with operating in the public interest, may be under strong political and social pressures to give much more attention to externalities. They may be obliged to operate some loss making activities where social benefits are clearly greater than social costs - for example, rural, postal and transport services. As an instance, the U.S. Mail is guaranteed its nationalised status by the Constitution. The government has recognized these social obligations and, in some cases, provides subsidies for such non-commercial operations.

Since the nationalised industries are state owned, the government is responsible for meeting any debts incurred by these industries. The nationalized industries do not normally borrow from the domestic market other than for short-term borrowing.

Nationalization may occur with or without compensation to the former owners. If it takes place without compensation it is a case of expropriation. Nationalization is distinguished from property redistribution in that the government retains control of nationalized property. Some nationalizations take place when a government seizes property acquired illegally. For example, the French government seized the car-makers Renault because its owners had collaborated with the Nazi occupiers of France.

Compensation

A key issue in nationalization is payment of compensation to the former owner. The most controversial nationalizations, known as expropriations, are those where no compensation, or an amount far below the likely market value of the nationalized assets, is paid. Many nationalizations through expropriation have come after revolutions.

The traditional Western stance on compensation was expressed by United States Secretary of State Cordell Hull, during the 1938 Mexican nationalization of the petroleum industry, that compensation should be "prompt, effective and adequate." According to this view, the nationalizing state is obligated under international law to pay the deprived party the full value of the property taken. The opposing position has been taken mainly by developing countries, claiming that the question of compensation should be left entirely up to the sovereign state, in line with the Calvo Doctrine. Communist states have held that no compensation is due, based on socialist notions of private properties.

In 1962, the United Nations General Assembly adopted Resolution 1803, "Permanent Sovereignty over National Resources," which states that in the event of nationalization, the owner "shall be paid appropriate compensation in accordance with international law." In doing so, the UN rejected both the traditional Calvo-doctrinist view and the Communist view. The term "appropriate compensation" represents a compromise between the traditional views, taking into account the need of developing countries to pursue reform even without the ability to pay full compensation, and the Western concern for protection of private property.

When nationalizing a large business, the cost of compensation is so great that many legal nationalizations have happened when firms of national importance run close to bankruptcy and can be acquired by the government for little or no money. A classic example is the UK nationalization of the British Leyland Motor Corporation. At other times, governments have considered it important to gain control of institutions of strategic economic importance, such as banks or railways, or of important industries struggling economically. The case of Rolls-Royce plc, nationalized in 1971, is an interesting blend of these two arguments. This policy was sometimes known as ensuring government control of the "commanding heights" of the economy, to enable it to manage the economy better in terms of long-term development and medium-term stability. The extent of this policy declined in the 1980s and 1990s as governments increasingly privatized industries that had been nationalized, replacing their strategic economic influence with use of the tax system and of interest rates.

Nonetheless, national and local governments have seen the advantage of keeping key strategic assets in institutions that are not strongly profit-driven and can raise funds outside the public-sector constraints, but still retain some public accountability. Examples from the last five years in the United Kingdom include the vesting of the British railway infrastructure firm Railtrack in the not-for-profit company Network Rail, and the divestment of much council housing stock to "arms-length management companies," often with mutual status.

Notable nationalizations by country

Argentina

Australia

Bolivia

  • 2006 On May 1 2006, newly elected Bolivian leader Evo Morales announces plans to nationalize the country's natural gas industry; foreign-based companies are given six months to renegotiate their existing contracts.

Canada

  • 1918 Canadian National Railways, created from several systems nationwide following their bankruptcy during and after World War I, and since privatized. (N.B. VIA Rail Canada, operator of intercity passenger rail, remains nationalised)
  • 1944 Hydro-Québec, nationalized electricity concerns in Quebec by the Lesage government.
  • 1975 Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan, Province of Saskatchewan nationalized part of the potash industry. Many potash producers agreed to sell to the government instead of being nationalized.

Channel Islands

Aurigny Airlines was recently bought by the States of Jersey.

Chile

Cuba

The Castro government gradually expropriated all foreign-owned private companies after the Cuban Revolution of 1959. Most of these companies were owned by U.S. corporations and individuals. Bonds at 4.5% interest over twenty years were offered to U.S. companies, but the offer was rejected by U.S. ambassador Philip Bonsal, who requested the compensation up front.[1] Only a minor amount, $1.3 million, was paid to U.S. interests before deteriorating relations ended all cooperation between the two governments.[1] The United States established a registry of claims against the Cuban government, ultimately developing files on 5,911 specific companies. The Cuban government has refused to discuss the effective and adequate compensation of U.S. claims. The United States government continues to insist on compensation for U.S. companies. In 1966-68, the Castro government nationalized all remaining privately owned business entities in Cuba, down to the level of street vendors.

Czechoslovakia

  • 1948 All manufacturing enterprises.

Egypt

France

Nationalisation in France dates back to the 'regies' or State monopolies first organised under the ancien regime. For example, the monopoly on tobacco sales. Communications companies France Telecom and La Poste are relics of the State postal and telecommunications monopolies.

There was a major expansion of the nationalised sector following World War II. A second wave followed under Francois Mitterrand in the early 1980's but much of his work was reversed by Jacques Chirac.

  • 1938 Societe Nationale des Chemins de Fer Francais (SNCF) (originally a 51% State holding, increased to 100% in 1982)
  • 1945 Several nationalizations in France, including most important banks and Renault. The firm was seized for Louis Renault's alleged collaboration with Nazi Germany, although this condemnation was without judgement and after his death, making this case remarkable and rare. A later judgement (1949) admitted that Renault's plant never collaborated. Renault was successful but unprofitable whilst nationalised and remains successful today, after having been privatized in 1996.
  • 1946 Charbonnages de France, Electricite de France (EdF), Gaz de France (GdF)
  • 1982 The Paris business of M&A advisory firm Rothschild was nationalized and renamed.

The Paris regional transport operator, Regie Autonome des Transports Parisiens (RATP), can also be counted as a nationalised industry.

Germany

The German railways were nationalised after World War I.

Most enterprises in East Germany were nationalised following World War II. After reunification, an agency, Treuhand, was established to return them to private ownership.

Greece

India

Iran

Ireland

Railways in the Republic of Ireland were nationalised in the 1940's as Coras Iompair Eireann.

  • 2007 On August 3 2007, The Irish government have been offered a stake in Eircom's copper network infrastructure[2], should they accept it, it shall represent the return to state ownership of Ireland's Telecommunication's network which was privatised in 1999.

Israel

  • 1983 Nationalization of the major Israeli banks: Bank Hapoalim, bank Leumi, Discount Bank, Mezrachi bank due to the Bank stock crisis that struck Israel in 1983.

Italy

The regime of Benito Mussolini extended nationalisation, creating the Istituto per la Ricostruzione Industriale (IRI) as a State holding company for struggling firms, including the car maker Alfa Romeo. A parallel body, Ente Nazionale Idrocarburi (Eni) was set up to manage State oil and gas interests.

Japan

Malta

Mexico

New Zealand

  • 2001 Central government purchased the Auckland railway network from TranzRail.
  • 2003 The Labour Government of New Zealand took an 80% stake in near-bankrupt national air carrier Air New Zealand in exchange for a large financial infusion.
  • 2004 The rest of the country's rail network is purchased from Toll New Zealand, formerly known as TranzRail. A new state owned enterprise, ONTRACK, was established to maintain the rail infrastructure.
  • 2008 The rolling stock of Toll New Zealand was purchased by central government, bringing the rail system under total state ownership and renamed as KiwiRail.

Philippines

During the administration of Ferdinand Marcos, important companies such as PLDT, Philippine Airlines, Meralco and the Manila Hotel were nationalized. Other companies were sometimes absorbed into these government-owned corporations, as well as other companies, such as Napocor and the Philippine National Railways, which in their own right are monopolies (exceptions are Meralco and the Manila Hotel). Today, these companies have been reprivatized and some, such as PLDT and Philippine Airlines, have been de-monopolized. Others, like government-formed and owned Napocor, are in the process of privatization.

Portugal

After the Carnation Revolution, the Junta de Salvação Nacional (temporary government) nationalized all the banking, ensurance, petrol and industries companies. Along with the telecommunications companies, which were state-owned even before the Revolution, all the nacionalized companies were reprivatized.

Romania

  • 1948 With the Decree 119 of June 1948 the new Romanian communist regime nationalised all the existing private companies and their assets in Romania leading to the transformation of the Romanian economy from a market economy to a planned economy.

Russia and the Soviet Union

Soviet Russia and Soviet Union (1918–1992)

  • 1918 All manufacturing enterprises and many retailing enterprises.

Russia

  • 1998 State began seizing Gazprom assets, claiming that the company owed back taxes. Privatization of Gazprom from the mid 1990's had been reduced to 38.37% with the intention of achieving full privatization. However, the stake of the Russian Government in Gazprom has since been increased to 50% with Vladimir Putin's plan to increase the stake to a controlling position. Gazprom is also buying up both Russian and other international Utility companies.

South Korea

  • 1946 USAMGIK nationalized all South Korean private railroad companies and made Department of Transportation. This now becomes Korail.

Spain

  • 1941 Spain's railways were nationalised, as RENFE, in the aftermath of the Spanish Civil War.
  • 1983 Nationalization without compensation of the Spanish Rumasa. Separate business were later privatized.

United Kingdom

The following companies/industries were the subject of nationalisation in the given year:

British assets nationalised by other countries

  • 1940s Argentine railways
  • 1953 British Petroleum's Iranian assets by their government (actually a nationalisation of part of a part-nationalised company)
  • 1956 The Egyptian Government nationalised the Suez Canal, owned by the Suez Canal Company which was part owned by the British State.

United States

Venezuela

Zimbabwe

Zimbabwe has nationalized its food distribution infrastructure.

Other countries

See also

Footnotes

  1. ^ a b Thomas, Hugh (1971). Cuba; the Pursuit of Freedom. New York: Harper & Row. pp. p224, p252. ISBN 0060142596. {{cite book}}: |pages= has extra text (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  2. ^ Eircom and State in broadband swap?