User contributions for Compvis
A user with 152 edits. Account created on 19 August 2009.
29 December 2014
- 02:0102:01, 29 December 2014 diff hist −1 Orders of magnitude (data) Undid revision 638413298 by 12.18.245.217 (talk) As stated in the lede, and justified with citations throughout WP, "The decimal SI prefixes kilo, mega etc., are powers of 10".
- 01:5201:52, 29 December 2014 diff hist +37 Template:Quantities of bytes The values *ought* to include a unit.
19 June 2014
- 06:3706:37, 19 June 2014 diff hist 0 Orders of magnitude (data) Undid revision 612816394 by Phycoz (talk) Please check your math.
11 May 2014
- 18:1518:15, 11 May 2014 diff hist +49 Template:Quantities of bytes made the link more specific
- 18:0818:08, 11 May 2014 diff hist +49 Template:Bit and byte prefixes made the link more specific
- 18:0618:06, 11 May 2014 diff hist +49 Template:Quantities of bits made the link more specific
- 17:2117:21, 11 May 2014 diff hist −3 Kilobyte Unwarranted qualification - Undid revision 608066648 by 89.243.163.18 (talk)
29 April 2014
- 09:0909:09, 29 April 2014 diff hist −89 Gigabyte improve the structure, and give due weight to each usage (based on the supporting standards)
- 06:4806:48, 29 April 2014 diff hist +4 1024 (number) →Special use in computers: unambiguous unit name
19 April 2014
- 12:2312:23, 19 April 2014 diff hist −32 Semiconductor memory →Description: The IEC prefixes are unambiguous and follow many standards, including the International System of Quantities (ISQ).
6 April 2014
- 21:3221:32, 6 April 2014 diff hist −66 Data type removed weird strings
- 21:2921:29, 6 April 2014 diff hist +394 User talk:Compvis →The lede at Binary prefix: comment current
- 21:2621:26, 6 April 2014 diff hist +1,113 Talk:Binary prefix →Compvis's edits to the lede: some comments
- 07:5407:54, 6 April 2014 diff hist +612 User talk:Compvis reply
- 06:5906:59, 6 April 2014 diff hist +23 Binary prefix Undid revision 602965747 by Jeh (talk) A binary prefix inherently implies: a prefix and a power of two. Computing and powers of 1024 are not inherent, but incidental. Compare to decimal prefixes and 1000.
- 04:3304:33, 6 April 2014 diff hist +84 User talk:Compvis signing...
- 03:4603:46, 6 April 2014 diff hist +1,491 User talk:Compvis →Follow consensus: reply
5 April 2014
- 21:2221:22, 5 April 2014 diff hist +463 Talk:Binary prefix →If not JEDEC: comment
- 20:5920:59, 5 April 2014 diff hist +23 Binary prefix The changes made to the first paragraph carried no judgement, and were clearly improvements.
- 20:4320:43, 5 April 2014 diff hist +65 Template:Quantities of bytes it's important to mention the inconsistency with the SI
- 20:3920:39, 5 April 2014 diff hist +88 Template:Quantities of bits it's important to mention the inconsistency with the SI
- 20:3320:33, 5 April 2014 diff hist +67 Template:Bit and byte prefixes it's important to mention the inconsistency with the SI
- 20:0220:02, 5 April 2014 diff hist +83 Binary prefix Clarified the intro.
- 19:3719:37, 5 April 2014 diff hist +205 Talk:Binary prefix →If not JEDEC
- 19:2419:24, 5 April 2014 diff hist +32 Megabyte →Examples of use: It's important to mention there is no compression.
- 08:1908:19, 5 April 2014 diff hist +1,777 Talk:Megabyte →binary again: some comments
3 April 2014
- 08:5808:58, 3 April 2014 diff hist +1,047 Talk:Megabyte →binary again: Going to the source is quite helpful.
- 08:2608:26, 3 April 2014 diff hist +125 Giga- A gigabit is never (or very rarely) used to mean a binary multiple of bits. This is one reason why using giga as a binary prefix is inconsistent and deprecated by many standards.
2 April 2014
- 18:2018:20, 2 April 2014 diff hist +5 m Orders of magnitude (data) kibi is similar to kilo, but not equivalent, etc.
- 18:1418:14, 2 April 2014 diff hist −107 Orders of magnitude (data) There are no exceptions. Orders of magnitude don't change for computers.
- 17:5917:59, 2 April 2014 diff hist −176 Megabyte →Examples of use: Removed the example about a rare usage of MB, fixed the image size.
- 17:5517:55, 2 April 2014 diff hist +82 Megabyte Added helpful comments.
- 06:5206:52, 2 April 2014 diff hist +188 Kilo- Expansion on the definition.
30 November 2013
- 20:5920:59, 30 November 2013 diff hist +974 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers →Problematic binary prefix paragraph
- 12:4812:48, 30 November 2013 diff hist +385 m Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers Undid revision 583897057 by Arthur Rubin (talk) You are welcome to provide a single other example of a SI prefix not defined as a multiple of 10. Until then please explain what is the lie.
- 09:3309:33, 30 November 2013 diff hist +385 Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers →Quantities of bytes and bits: Clarification.
- 08:5208:52, 30 November 2013 diff hist +43 m Gigabyte →Base 2 definition: Clarification
- 08:5108:51, 30 November 2013 diff hist +33 m Gigabyte →Base 10 definition: Clarification
- 08:4108:41, 30 November 2013 diff hist −102 Template:BDprefix/doc Undid revision 583879611 by Headbomb (talk) Actually, YOU should gain consensus at WP:MOSNUM first. This unit is completely obsolete, never used widely. Please come up with standards or statistics.
- 08:3708:37, 30 November 2013 diff hist +32 m Kilobyte Some clarifications. Removed redundancies.
- 07:2607:26, 30 November 2013 diff hist +63 m Megabyte →Definitions
- 06:2906:29, 30 November 2013 diff hist −102 Template:BDprefix/doc →Usage: The only way to make a unit sillier than the "floppy megabyte" would be to make a unit that changes based on the day of the week. It does not deserve to live. It is everything a unit shouldn't be: obsolete, confusing, non-SI.
29 November 2013
- 22:2822:28, 29 November 2013 diff hist +114 m Talk:Bag-of-words model No edit summary
- 22:2022:20, 29 November 2013 diff hist +37 Bag-of-words model corrections related to the fact that a bag is a multiset, for which multiplicity is significant
23 October 2013
- 20:5720:57, 23 October 2013 diff hist −831 Kilo- It is worth mentioning the exception for kilobyte, but this should be short since it is such a small exception.
- 20:3220:32, 23 October 2013 diff hist +10 Template:Bit and byte prefixes The JEDEC Standard No. 100B.01 never mentions tera or any larger prefix.
- 20:2920:29, 23 October 2013 diff hist +37 Template:Quantities of bytes →See also: Added a related template.
- 20:2720:27, 23 October 2013 diff hist +35 Template:Bit and byte prefixes →See also: Added a related template.
- 20:1020:10, 23 October 2013 diff hist −17 Metric prefix →Similar symbols in abbreviations: Fixed a link. Added a precision.
- 19:5319:53, 23 October 2013 diff hist −83 JEDEC memory standards →Unit prefixes for semiconductor storage capacity: JEDEC redefines the SI prefixes which are standard worldwide, and this is important to mention.
- 19:2019:20, 23 October 2013 diff hist +4 Template:Quantities of bits The JEDEC Standard No. 100B.01 never mentions terabit or any larger unit, and never suggests that the units should start by a capital letter.
- 19:1719:17, 23 October 2013 diff hist +4 Template:Quantities of bytes The JEDEC Standard No. 100B.01 never mentions terabyte or any larger unit, and never suggests that the units should start by a capital letter.
29 April 2013
- 02:5402:54, 29 April 2013 diff hist −12 Terabyte Improved phrasing.
14 April 2013
- 19:3019:30, 14 April 2013 diff hist −31 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers more about redefinition
- 00:4000:40, 14 April 2013 diff hist +369 User talk:Compvis →Follow consensus: Why don't YOU follow the consensus?
- 00:1700:17, 14 April 2013 diff hist +28 Template:Quantities of bytes I had a justification (the worldwide consensus is the International System of Units). This is the NPOV. Undid revision 550230849 by Arthur Rubin (talk)
- 00:1300:13, 14 April 2013 diff hist −2 Zettabyte There is virtually no usage of zettabyte is the whole history of the world. Undid revision 550231003 by Arthur Rubin (talk)
- 00:0400:04, 14 April 2013 diff hist +2 m User talk:Compvis →Follow consensus
- 00:0400:04, 14 April 2013 diff hist +535 User talk:Compvis →Follow consensus: The worldwide consensus is the SI. This is the NPOV.
13 April 2013
- 23:5623:56, 13 April 2013 diff hist +1,383 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers →IEC vs ISO binary prefixes: The NPOV is the Internation System of Units.
- 23:0723:07, 13 April 2013 diff hist −3,050 Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers Usage of kilo, mega, and giga as binary prefixes (as mentionned in JEDEC) is inconsistent with the International System of Units (SI). Undid revision 547453602 by Jc3s5h (talk)
- 22:3722:37, 13 April 2013 diff hist −2 Zettabyte Correction in accordance with the SI.
- 22:1622:16, 13 April 2013 diff hist −33 Terabyte Correction in accordance with the SI.
- 22:0222:02, 13 April 2013 diff hist +28 Template:Quantities of bytes In conformance to the JEDEC standard. Also there has never been ANY usage of exabyte or higher in the binary sense.
- 21:5221:52, 13 April 2013 diff hist −45 Megabit Other correction in accordance with the SI.
- 21:4921:49, 13 April 2013 diff hist −34 Megabit Correction in accordance with the SI.
3 April 2013
- 06:5006:50, 3 April 2013 diff hist +13 m Random-access memory Correction to use the unit correctly.
30 March 2013
- 23:4423:44, 30 March 2013 diff hist +80 Kilo- Improved the item about kB.
- 20:2720:27, 30 March 2013 diff hist −39 User talk:Compvis removed Category:Test12 using HotCat
27 March 2013
- 22:4422:44, 27 March 2013 diff hist −25 Conversion of units →Information entropy: Following the recommandation of IEEE/ASTM SI 10-1997, kilo is a multiple of 10, and not a power of 2.
- 22:0822:08, 27 March 2013 diff hist +221 Metric prefix →Similar symbols in abbreviations: Improved the part about the computer industry.
25 March 2013
- 20:1620:16, 25 March 2013 diff hist −36 Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers →Quantities of bytes and bits: JEDEC does not redefine or mention tera or larger decimal prefixes.
23 March 2013
- 02:1902:19, 23 March 2013 diff hist +5 m JEDEC memory standards →Redefinition of SI prefixes for semiconductor storage capacity
- 02:1702:17, 23 March 2013 diff hist +28 Template:Quantities of bytes Thanks to Jeh for the mention. I've looked at the standard and improved the template.
- 02:1402:14, 23 March 2013 diff hist +29 Template:Quantities of bits Thanks to Jeh for the mention. I've looked at the standard and improved the template.
- 02:0002:00, 23 March 2013 diff hist −213 JEDEC memory standards The standard does not define or mention tera or any larger decimal prefix.
22 March 2013
- 09:4409:44, 22 March 2013 diff hist −38 m Tebibit Information isn't always stored.
- 09:4409:44, 22 March 2013 diff hist −38 m Gibibit Information isn't always stored.
- 09:4209:42, 22 March 2013 diff hist −168 Mebibit Removed old claim without citation + 1 correction.
- 09:3809:38, 22 March 2013 diff hist −73 Kibibit Removed old claim without citation.
- 09:3309:33, 22 March 2013 diff hist +17 m Template:Quantities of bytes Added deprecated.
- 09:3209:32, 22 March 2013 diff hist +17 m Template:Quantities of bits Added deprecated.
- 09:2409:24, 22 March 2013 diff hist −72 m Binary prefix Improved consistency.
- 09:1909:19, 22 March 2013 diff hist −104 Binary prefix Correction related to the International System of Units.
- 08:5108:51, 22 March 2013 diff hist −150 Tera- Mentionned the absence of standard.
- 08:3608:36, 22 March 2013 diff hist +2 Artificial intelligence Simplified the first part.
10 March 2013
- 03:1603:16, 10 March 2013 diff hist −74 W-shingling A set does not contain duplicate elements so you can't remove them.
22 February 2013
- 01:3201:32, 22 February 2013 diff hist −1 m Metrication opposition Useless comma.
28 January 2013
- 06:3506:35, 28 January 2013 diff hist +19 m Hamming distance correction
- 06:2506:25, 28 January 2013 diff hist +16 Structured learning correction (see the overview of the book "Predicting Structured Data")
25 January 2013
- 23:2523:25, 25 January 2013 diff hist +19 User talk:Compvis added Category:Test2 using HotCat
- 23:2523:25, 25 January 2013 diff hist +20 User talk:Compvis added Category:Test12 using HotCat
- 23:0223:02, 25 January 2013 diff hist +1 m Control system →Overview: syntax error
24 September 2012
- 09:0909:09, 24 September 2012 diff hist −1,377 User talk:Compvis →Welcome
- 01:3601:36, 24 September 2012 diff hist +113 m Binary prefix Simple edit to better reflect a NPOV.
13 July 2012
- 02:3402:34, 13 July 2012 diff hist +9 Tuple →Etymology: a 2-tuple is not a pair, since a pair is a set with cardinality 2
10 September 2011
- 05:3305:33, 10 September 2011 diff hist −2 Random sample consensus →The algorithm: error in the pseudocode
10 September 2010
- 08:2308:23, 10 September 2010 diff hist −12 Probability density function It was doing exactly what it suggested to avoid.
18 July 2010
- 19:0419:04, 18 July 2010 diff hist +21 Inverse problem Addition to the list of subject.
28 April 2010
- 20:0220:02, 28 April 2010 diff hist −210 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers →binary SI prefixes vs decimal SI prefixes
- 07:1407:14, 28 April 2010 diff hist +5 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers →binary SI prefixes vs decimal SI prefixes
- 06:5706:57, 28 April 2010 diff hist +588 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers →binary SI prefixes vs decimal SI prefixes
27 April 2010
- 13:1313:13, 27 April 2010 diff hist 0 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers →binary SI prefixes vs decimal SI prefixes
- 13:1213:12, 27 April 2010 diff hist +766 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers →binary SI prefixes vs decimal SI prefixes
- 03:3103:31, 27 April 2010 diff hist 0 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers No edit summary
- 03:3003:30, 27 April 2010 diff hist +206 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers →binary SI prefixes vs decimal SI prefixes
26 April 2010
- 00:3400:34, 26 April 2010 diff hist +399 Template talk:Quantities of bits No edit summary
25 April 2010
- 05:4905:49, 25 April 2010 diff hist +662 Template talk:Quantities of bits No edit summary
- 05:1605:16, 25 April 2010 diff hist +26 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers No edit summary
- 05:1305:13, 25 April 2010 diff hist +1,232 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers No edit summary
24 April 2010
- 22:2022:20, 24 April 2010 diff hist −201 Template:Quantities of bits made it clearer
- 21:4921:49, 24 April 2010 diff hist −197 m Template:Quantities of bytes made it clearer
- 21:1321:13, 24 April 2010 diff hist +81 Template talk:Quantities of bits No edit summary
- 21:1121:11, 24 April 2010 diff hist +1,128 Template talk:Quantities of bits No edit summary
- 20:4220:42, 24 April 2010 diff hist +11 God No edit summary
- 20:1220:12, 24 April 2010 diff hist +353 Template talk:Quantities of bits No edit summary
- 20:0020:00, 24 April 2010 diff hist −197 m Binary prefix Undid revision 358053745 by Shreevatsa (talk) modification made according to NPOV
- 19:2319:23, 24 April 2010 diff hist −4 Template talk:Quantities of bits No edit summary
- 19:2219:22, 24 April 2010 diff hist −3 Template talk:Quantities of bits No edit summary
- 19:2219:22, 24 April 2010 diff hist +840 Template talk:Quantities of bits No edit summary
- 19:2019:20, 24 April 2010 diff hist −2 User:Compvis ←Blanked the page current
- 19:1719:17, 24 April 2010 diff hist +2 N User:Compvis ←Created page with ':)'
- 18:4218:42, 24 April 2010 diff hist −170 Petabyte SI isn't ambiguous.
- 18:3018:30, 24 April 2010 diff hist +34 Template:Quantities of bits Undid revision 358051166 by Shreevatsa (talk) @Shreevatsa: Well yes! The SI is amongst the most widely shared "opinions" ever. Mega:P
- 18:1818:18, 24 April 2010 diff hist +34 Template:Quantities of bytes SI isn't ambiguous.
- 18:1418:14, 24 April 2010 diff hist −244 Binary prefix SI isn't ambiguous.
- 17:3617:36, 24 April 2010 diff hist +34 Template:Quantities of bits SI prefixes are clearer
- 17:2817:28, 24 April 2010 diff hist +24 Units of information →Systematic multiples
4 November 2009
- 07:3507:35, 4 November 2009 diff hist −30 Watershed (image processing) reduced redundancy + improved sentence
31 August 2009
- 12:0012:00, 31 August 2009 diff hist +4 Figure-ground (cartography) →Research in figure-ground relationships: added a link
- 11:5411:54, 31 August 2009 diff hist +7 Computer vision →Applications for computer vision: better formulation
- 11:5211:52, 31 August 2009 diff hist +5 Computer vision →Related fields: better term
- 11:4111:41, 31 August 2009 diff hist −18 Computer vision →Related fields: I never heard of this field called "robot vision", and also it doesn't even have an article, so removed
19 August 2009
- 06:4906:49, 19 August 2009 diff hist +13 Oren–Nayar reflectance model →Introduction: clarification
- 06:4806:48, 19 August 2009 diff hist +5 Robot series →Cultural impact
- 06:4206:42, 19 August 2009 diff hist +5 m List of University of the Witwatersrand people →Science and Technology: correction to terminology
- 06:3806:38, 19 August 2009 diff hist +1 Scale space →Motivations: correction to terminology
- 06:3706:37, 19 August 2009 diff hist −10 Figure-ground (cartography) →Research in figure-ground relationships
- 06:3606:36, 19 August 2009 diff hist +1 m Visual system →See also: computer vision is more general than machine vision
- 06:3306:33, 19 August 2009 diff hist +1 Avinash Kak No edit summary
- 06:2506:25, 19 August 2009 diff hist +1 Lawrence J. Rosenblum →Research trends in Visualization
- 06:2406:24, 19 August 2009 diff hist +4 Lawrence J. Rosenblum →The emergence of scientific visualization
- 06:2006:20, 19 August 2009 diff hist +2 Hans Moravec clarification
- 06:1306:13, 19 August 2009 diff hist −307 Computer vision →Related fields: correcting some errors: they are not the same field at all
- 06:0506:05, 19 August 2009 diff hist +1 Optical character recognition machine vision is not an academic domain of research, it is an engineering discipline, whereas computer vision is
- 06:0206:02, 19 August 2009 diff hist −28 m Piggybacking (security) →Levels of security: machine vision it a commercial term for computer vision applied to manufacturing and industry
- 05:5305:53, 19 August 2009 diff hist +16 Machine vision →Related fields: let's reduce the exagerations!
- 05:4105:41, 19 August 2009 diff hist −204 Machine vision →Applications of machine vision: machine vision is a commercial term for computer vision applied to industry and manufacturing
- 05:4005:40, 19 August 2009 diff hist −402 Machine vision →Applications of machine vision: machine vision is a commercial term for computer vision applied to industry and manufacturing
- 05:3305:33, 19 August 2009 diff hist +65 m Machine vision clarifications
- 04:5604:56, 19 August 2009 diff hist +53 Computer vision →Applications for computer vision: specify that computer vision applied to industry and manufacturing is machine vision
- 04:1804:18, 19 August 2009 diff hist +1 Augmented reality machine vision => computer vision (machine vision is an engineering discipline applied to industry and manufacturing, computer vision is more general)
