Talk:2022 United States Senate elections

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2022 United States Senate elections article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 180 days

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 November 2019. The result of the discussion was keep.

A news item involving 2022 United States Senate elections was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 14 November 2022.

Wikipedia

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

U.S. Congress Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) event(s).

Popular vote anybody?

I guess its relatively meaningless but still some sort of information to see which parties got more votes overall. 80.131.62.210 (talk) 19:29, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The 2020 article shows that under the Election Results section. However, given that this just recently happened, it is likely that it will take some time for a similar section to be created here. --Super Goku V (talk) 23:48, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be best to wait until every state has certified its votes to add the popular vote for the Senate, especially considering how long it's taking California. I do have a separate question, though. For states that use ranked-choice voting, do we use the final round (the first round where a candidate got over 50% of the vote) in popular vote calculations, or do we use the first round? I would imagine the final round, but I just want to make sure. OutlawRun (talk) 02:40, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

cool, any idea when that would get finished though? KratosVAsphodel (talk) 07:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fixing tenses...

As a first-time reader of this page, it was, at times, challenging to decipher which was the most-current results. Post-election, much of the background information remains in the past tense. Especially in the state-by-state Senate results (I got as far as the end of that section before writing), and elsewhere throughout. MishaAmI (talk) 15:45, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Inclusion of VP in the infobox

Ok, I haven't found the revision that introduced the 48+VP language yet, but it was sometime in the last year. Points in favor of not including the VP at all in the majority number at all are that: We already have the majorities bolded and a note about tiebreakers at the top of the infobox, and that it could be confusing to a reader to see that the VP is present before the election but not after. Points in favor of having the VP in the pre-election majority number: it's accurate, and there's a note right there explaining it if anyone's confused.

I could be convinced either way. What I can't be convinced of is including the VP in majorities where that does not impact whether there is a majority. The Savage Norwegian 18:34, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am of the opinion that the VP indicator should only be there when the VP's presence breaks the tie to determine the majority. I generally think it should be visible as it has been instead of just as a footnote, but other state legislative pages have simply used footnotes to explain lieutenant governors breaking ties or other things like that. We have precedent for the "+VP" indicator going back to at least the 2020 election when Democrats narrowly won control, so I lean on that instinctually, but I could be convinced that it only needs to be in a footnote. OutlawRun (talk) 18:41, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]