Talk:Chinese Canadians in Greater Vancouver

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Skookum1 (talk | contribs) at 02:03, 17 June 2015 (→‎POV/ESSAY/SYNTH/TRIVIA tags added: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Lead

Time to start expanding the lead? Viriditas (talk) 02:05, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'll be happy to do that! WhisperToMe (talk) 06:59, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Airline service

I restored the bits about airline service, for two reasons:

I suspect Cathay Pacific began its operations in Vancouver long before 1992, and I would like to get info on the Vancouver operations of the Taiwanese airlines, China Airlines and EVA Air. WhisperToMe (talk) 06:59, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

POV/ESSAY/SYNTH/TRIVIA tags added

This article has all the very same problems that the Chinese Canadians in British Columbia article has, and the reasons are laid out on the talkpage there; they have been ignored by the shepherding editor here who is unconcerned with and doesn't care about WP:NPOV which is policy. Numerous guidelines are violated, I won't waste my breath; but somewhere along teh way someone who does not share the biased views and scholastic premises that the OWN author of this article has laid out, and will recognize the incredibly bad English composition, and the use of pasting together cherrypicked items to build SYNTH/POV...so very obvious. "Honestly I think these tags are more than deserved", to paraphrase the edit comment of their illicit removal from the CCinBC article by the sole author here who successfully lobbied to have me blocked so he was not 'interfered with'. What has been interfered with is BC history with a very clear ethnopolitical bias and soapbox agenda.

I am leaving Wikipedia; I will not waste my efforts any longer for a place where travesty like this was mollycoddled and nurtured in violations of several guidelines and also of the NPOV policy'. this article is a political tract rife with synthesis and cherrypicked sources, and distortions of others. tiresome and juvenile and a good demonstration of why Wikipedia is not real encyclopedia but more and more a compilation of jejune essays - and outright propaganda.Skookum1 (talk) 02:03, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]