Talk:Fred Upton: Difference between revisions
Arthur Rubin (talk | contribs) Reverted 1 edit by 99.181.143.181 (talk): Your being banned was not the only reason for removing this travesty of WP:TALK. (TW) |
NYT quote. Undid revision 500160157 by Arthur Rubin (talk) |
||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
::Or [[Energy policy of the United States]] ([[United States Wind Energy Policy]], [[Renewable energy policy]], [[Carbon pricing]] for example), [[Environmental policy of the United States]], or currently [[Foreign_policy_of_the_Barack_Obama_administration#Climate_change|Foreign policy of the Barack Obama administration # Climate change]]? [[Special:Contributions/99.181.138.132|99.181.138.132]] ([[User talk:99.181.138.132|talk]]) 03:40, 25 July 2011 (UTC) |
::Or [[Energy policy of the United States]] ([[United States Wind Energy Policy]], [[Renewable energy policy]], [[Carbon pricing]] for example), [[Environmental policy of the United States]], or currently [[Foreign_policy_of_the_Barack_Obama_administration#Climate_change|Foreign policy of the Barack Obama administration # Climate change]]? [[Special:Contributions/99.181.138.132|99.181.138.132]] ([[User talk:99.181.138.132|talk]]) 03:40, 25 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
::Or the globalized [[Politics of global warming]]? [[Special:Contributions/99.181.138.132|99.181.138.132]] ([[User talk:99.181.138.132|talk]]) 03:37, 25 July 2011 (UTC) |
::Or the globalized [[Politics of global warming]]? [[Special:Contributions/99.181.138.132|99.181.138.132]] ([[User talk:99.181.138.132|talk]]) 03:37, 25 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
== Useful quote? == |
|||
Regarding the [[regulation of greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act]] being upheld in Federal Appeals court, per [http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/27/science/earth/epa-emissions-rules-backed-by-court.htmlCourt Backs E.P.A. Over Emissions Limits Intended to Reduce Global Warming] June 26, 2012; excerpt ... {{Quotation|But Representative Fred Upton, the Michigan Republican who is chairman of the [[United States House Committee on Energy and Commerce|House Energy and Commerce Committee]], said that Congress’s refusal to approve [[greenhouse gas]] limits constituted a decision and that lawmakers should act now to reverse the [[E.P.A.]] emissions rules. Carbon regulation “threatens to drive energy prices higher, destroy jobs and hamstring our economic recovery,” he said. Industry is divided on regulating climate-changing gases, with the [[Petroleum industry|oil]], [[Natural gas industry|gas]], [[Coal industry|coal]] and most of the electricity sectors opposing emissions limits and [[United states automobile sector|automakers]] supporting them. In a statement, the [[Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers]] noted that car companies had made huge investments to improve fuel economy and thus reduce [[carbon dioxide emissions]] and that a unified emissions standard was among its “top national priorities.”}} |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/99.181.136.82|99.181.136.82]] ([[User talk:99.181.136.82|talk]]) 07:12, 29 June 2012 (UTC) |
|||
This maybe inversely related: [[Talk:Tea Party movement/Archive 18#Add Energy Policy section? Resource: Get the Energy Sector off the Dole?]] [[Special:Contributions/99.181.136.82|99.181.136.82]] ([[User talk:99.181.136.82|talk]]) 07:16, 29 June 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:56, 6 July 2012
U.S. Congress Start‑class | |||||||||||||
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This page is about an active politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism. |
Biography: Politics and Government Start‑class | ||||||||||
|
Michigan Start‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Abortion
I thought Fred was a confirmed Pro-Choicer? The article says "supposedly". Any documentation either way? Endorsed by any pro-life or pro-choice groups?
He is pro-abortion in cases of rape, incest and where life of the mother is in question.
2006 Election
Link to Kim Clark leads to the wrong person. The Kim Clark who is running against Fred Upton has a website at http://www.kimclarkforcongress.com/
I'm new to wikipedia, so am not sure how to fix this. - JF
--
now links to Kim Clark (candidate)--Jfloydnv 01:01, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
The 15th?
Um, I know this sounds like an extremely stupid question, but, uh, I heard a rumor that Fred Upton is Fred Upton the 15th, and was wondering if anyone knew if there was any truth to this.
His dad's name is Steven Upton, so no. He also has a second cousin named Fred Upton, who is also Fred Upton I.
Predecessor
Wasn't Fred preceded by Mark Siljander? I believe he defeated him in a primary, Stockman was before Siljander...realizing the district has been redrawn numerous times, perhaps someone can clarify...
Include clarification "of referring to greenhouse gas emissions by the United States."
Include clarification "of referring to greenhouse gas emissions by the United States." 97.87.29.188 (talk) 21:38, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- Why? "Greenhouse gas emissions", perhaps, but, even though talking about US policy, said policy can and should effect greenhouse gas emissions by other countries. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 07:12, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
- By US Policy, do you intend Climate change policy of the United States? 99.181.138.132 (talk) 03:33, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
- Or Energy policy of the United States (United States Wind Energy Policy, Renewable energy policy, Carbon pricing for example), Environmental policy of the United States, or currently Foreign policy of the Barack Obama administration # Climate change? 99.181.138.132 (talk) 03:40, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
- Or the globalized Politics of global warming? 99.181.138.132 (talk) 03:37, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Useful quote?
Regarding the regulation of greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act being upheld in Federal Appeals court, per Backs E.P.A. Over Emissions Limits Intended to Reduce Global Warming June 26, 2012; excerpt ...
But Representative Fred Upton, the Michigan Republican who is chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, said that Congress’s refusal to approve greenhouse gas limits constituted a decision and that lawmakers should act now to reverse the E.P.A. emissions rules. Carbon regulation “threatens to drive energy prices higher, destroy jobs and hamstring our economic recovery,” he said. Industry is divided on regulating climate-changing gases, with the oil, gas, coal and most of the electricity sectors opposing emissions limits and automakers supporting them. In a statement, the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers noted that car companies had made huge investments to improve fuel economy and thus reduce carbon dioxide emissions and that a unified emissions standard was among its “top national priorities.”
99.181.136.82 (talk) 07:12, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
This maybe inversely related: Talk:Tea Party movement/Archive 18#Add Energy Policy section? Resource: Get the Energy Sector off the Dole? 99.181.136.82 (talk) 07:16, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
- Start-Class U.S. Congress articles
- Unknown-importance U.S. Congress articles
- Unknown-subject U.S. Congress articles
- Biography articles of living people
- Active politicians
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class Michigan articles
- High-importance Michigan articles
- WikiProject Michigan articles