Talk:Korean influence on Japanese culture: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
==Mistaken Link== |
==Mistaken Link== |
||
"[[:ja:韓国起源説]]" is different from "[[Korean influence on Japanese culture]]". "[[:ja:韓国起源説]]" is the article about the list of wrong insistances from some Korean about historical origin of various things. "[[:ja:韓国起源説]]" is not the article about the history of common. Editors have corrected the wrong insistances by some Korean. For example, some Korean insists the origin of [[Samurai]] is Korea, not Japan. Besides some Korean insists the origin of [[Chinese character]] is Korea. (I don't know the truth of these story. Maybe some Korean just enjoy some jokes.) These some Korean's insistances make angry some Japanese and Chinese. "[[:ja:韓国起源説]]" is the article about the culutural argument between Korea and ohter nations(Japan & China). So, the interlink ([[:ja:韓国起源説]]-[[Korean influence on Japanese culture]])is not within reason. "[[:ja:韓国起源説]]" is deadly different from "[[Korean influence on Japanese culture]]". I will cut the mistaken link.[[Special:Contributions/122.26.95.13|122.26.95.13]] ([[User talk:122.26.95.13|talk]]) 09:19, 9 May 2009 (UTC) |
"[[:ja:韓国起源説]]" is different from "[[Korean influence on Japanese culture]]". "[[:ja:韓国起源説]]" is the article about the list of wrong insistances from some Korean about historical origin of various things. "[[:ja:韓国起源説]]" is not the article about the history of common. Editors have corrected the wrong insistances by some Korean. For example, some Korean insists the origin of [[Samurai]] is Korea, not Japan. Besides some Korean insists the origin of [[Chinese character]] is Korea. (I don't know the truth of these story. Maybe some Korean just enjoy some jokes.) These some Korean's insistances make angry some Japanese and Chinese. "[[:ja:韓国起源説]]" is the article about the culutural argument between Korea and ohter nations(Japan & China). So, the interlink ([[:ja:韓国起源説]]-[[Korean influence on Japanese culture]])is not within reason. "[[:ja:韓国起源説]]" is deadly different from "[[Korean influence on Japanese culture]]". <del>I will cut the mistaken link.</del>I think it is better to cut the mistaken interlink.<del>[[Special:Contributions/122.26.95.13|122.26.95.13]] ([[User talk:122.26.95.13|talk]]) 09:19, 9 May 2009 (UTC)</del>-[[Special:Contributions/122.26.95.13|122.26.95.13]] ([[User talk:122.26.95.13|talk]]) 09:28, 9 May 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:28, 9 May 2009
Korea Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Japan Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Title
The title should be Out of Korea theory or hypothesis. Reading other articles in Chinese and Japanese, this story is not about the Korean influence on Japanese Culture, but Korean's Out of Korea theory which insist Korea has influence on all over the world. Current article is a bit worthless since the citations are from one book only. - 219.98.208.195 (talk) 11:23, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
If you wish to help...
feel free, but please only add sourced information or discuss it here first. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Globalscene (talk • contribs)
Protected
This article has been protected from editing due to a content dispute. Please come to consensus here and than ask an admin for assistance (you can even ask me if you wish) with unprotecting the page. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 06:57, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Mistaken Link
"ja:韓国起源説" is different from "Korean influence on Japanese culture". "ja:韓国起源説" is the article about the list of wrong insistances from some Korean about historical origin of various things. "ja:韓国起源説" is not the article about the history of common. Editors have corrected the wrong insistances by some Korean. For example, some Korean insists the origin of Samurai is Korea, not Japan. Besides some Korean insists the origin of Chinese character is Korea. (I don't know the truth of these story. Maybe some Korean just enjoy some jokes.) These some Korean's insistances make angry some Japanese and Chinese. "ja:韓国起源説" is the article about the culutural argument between Korea and ohter nations(Japan & China). So, the interlink (ja:韓国起源説-Korean influence on Japanese culture)is not within reason. "ja:韓国起源説" is deadly different from "Korean influence on Japanese culture". I will cut the mistaken link.I think it is better to cut the mistaken interlink.122.26.95.13 (talk) 09:19, 9 May 2009 (UTC)-122.26.95.13 (talk) 09:28, 9 May 2009 (UTC)