Talk:Korean influence on Japanese culture: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by Korean1civilization - "→If you wish to help...: " |
|||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
:It is recognized that it is ja:[[:ja:韓国起源説]] and this article is all another articles. And, It is recognized also that it is a related article. [[:ja:韓国起源説]] is pointing out that there are a lot of lies compared with the theory "South Korea influenced Japan". It is this exactly article. I cannot be thought that the link to [[:ja:韓国起源説]] is a mistaken Link.--[[User:Kigyousensi|Kigyousensi]] ([[User talk:Kigyousensi|talk]]) 23:20, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
:It is recognized that it is ja:[[:ja:韓国起源説]] and this article is all another articles. And, It is recognized also that it is a related article. [[:ja:韓国起源説]] is pointing out that there are a lot of lies compared with the theory "South Korea influenced Japan". It is this exactly article. I cannot be thought that the link to [[:ja:韓国起源説]] is a mistaken Link.--[[User:Kigyousensi|Kigyousensi]] ([[User talk:Kigyousensi|talk]]) 23:20, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
||
::Do you read Japanese Language? "[[Korean influence on Japanese culture]]" is the aricle about historical truth. Otherwise, "[[:ja:韓国起源説]]" is not the aricle about the correct history. It is simular to [[Geocentric model]]. "[[Korean influence on Japanese culture]] is not equal" to "[[:ja:韓国起源説]]". If I translate "[[Korean influence on Japanese culture]]", it will not be "韓国起源説", but "朝鮮半島の諸王朝が日本の文化へ及ぼした影響". It is similar to [[ja:日朝関係史]]. It is very different from [[:ja:韓国起源説]].[[Special:Contributions/122.26.95.13|122.26.95.13]] ([[User talk:122.26.95.13|talk]]) 12:17, 2 July 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:17, 2 July 2009
Korea Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Japan Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Title
The title should be Out of Korea theory or hypothesis. Reading other articles in Chinese and Japanese, this story is not about the Korean influence on Japanese Culture, but Korean's Out of Korea theory which insist Korea has influence on all over the world. Current article is a bit worthless since the citations are from one book only. - 219.98.208.195 (talk) 11:23, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
If you wish to help...
feel free, but please only add sourced information or discuss it here first. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Globalscene (talk • contribs)
1) Tomb Culture
2) Toraijin ( Korean immigrants to Japan).
3) Yayoi People: Come from Korea
4) Hata clan
5) Kudara Kingdom
6) Korean and kansai connection. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Korean1historian (talk • contribs) 13:46, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
7) Oichi Clan: Founder and Powerful Ruler ( Yamaguchi Province). This clan is from Kudara ( Paekje) Kingdom. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Korean1civilization (talk • contribs) 08:36, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
Protected
This article has been protected from editing due to a content dispute. Please come to consensus here and than ask an admin for assistance (you can even ask me if you wish) with unprotecting the page. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 06:57, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Mistaken Link
"ja:韓国起源説" is different from "Korean influence on Japanese culture". "ja:韓国起源説" is the article about the list of wrong insistances from some Korean about historical origin of various things. "ja:韓国起源説" is not the article about the history of common. Editors have corrected the wrong insistances byof some Korean. For example, some Korean insists the origin of Samurai is Korea, not Japan. Besides some Korean insists the origin of Chinese character is Korea. (I don't know the truth of these story. Maybe some Korean just enjoy some jokes.) These some Korean's insistances make angry some Japanese and Chinese. "ja:韓国起源説" is the article about the culutural argument between Korea and ohter nations(Japan & China). So, the interlink (ja:韓国起源説-Korean influence on Japanese culture)is not within reason. "ja:韓国起源説" is deadly different from "Korean influence on Japanese culture". I will cut the mistaken link.I think it is better to cut the mistaken interlink.122.26.95.13 (talk) 09:19, 9 May 2009 (UTC)-122.26.95.13 (talk) 09:28, 9 May 2009 (UTC)---122.26.95.13 (talk) 09:32, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- It is recognized that it is ja:ja:韓国起源説 and this article is all another articles. And, It is recognized also that it is a related article. ja:韓国起源説 is pointing out that there are a lot of lies compared with the theory "South Korea influenced Japan". It is this exactly article. I cannot be thought that the link to ja:韓国起源説 is a mistaken Link.--Kigyousensi (talk) 23:20, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- Do you read Japanese Language? "Korean influence on Japanese culture" is the aricle about historical truth. Otherwise, "ja:韓国起源説" is not the aricle about the correct history. It is simular to Geocentric model. "Korean influence on Japanese culture is not equal" to "ja:韓国起源説". If I translate "Korean influence on Japanese culture", it will not be "韓国起源説", but "朝鮮半島の諸王朝が日本の文化へ及ぼした影響". It is similar to ja:日朝関係史. It is very different from ja:韓国起源説.122.26.95.13 (talk) 12:17, 2 July 2009 (UTC)