Talk:Thích Trí Quang: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m In ictu oculi moved page Talk:Thich Tri Quang to Talk:Thích Trí Quang: Thích Trí Quang |
Assessment: Biography: class=B; Buddhism: class=B, importance=Low; Vietnam: class=B, importance=Mid (assisted) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|blp=yes|1= |
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|blp=yes|1= |
||
{{WikiProject Biography |
{{WikiProject Biography |living=yes |class=B |listas=Thich, Tri Quang}} |
||
⚫ | |||
|living=yes |
|||
⚫ | |||
|class=start |
|||
|listas=Thich, Tri Quang |
|||
}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
}} |
}} |
||
{{dyktalk|30 May|2007|entry=...that the shooting of followers of [[Vietnamese people|Vietnamese]] [[Buddhist]] monk '''[[Thich Tri Quang]]''' by the [[Catholic]] government of [[Ngo Dinh Diem]] led to months of protests which culminated in a [[coup d'etat|coup]] in November 1963?}} |
{{dyktalk|30 May|2007|entry=...that the shooting of followers of [[Vietnamese people|Vietnamese]] [[Buddhist]] monk '''[[Thich Tri Quang]]''' by the [[Catholic]] government of [[Ngo Dinh Diem]] led to months of protests which culminated in a [[coup d'etat|coup]] in November 1963?}} |
Revision as of 15:23, 13 November 2019
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Thích Trí Quang appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 May 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Living Persons?
Why is this article listed in the Living Persons category? I read the article rather thoroughly and came to a rather firm conclusion that he is dead. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.185.10.126 (talk) 06:40, 15 June 2009 (UTC)