Talk:Thirst trap

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Peter Isotalo (talk | contribs) at 18:46, 17 March 2024 (→‎Image in lead: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 15:43, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An example of a thirst trap
An example of a thirst trap
  • ... that thirst traps (pictured) can lead to harassment and bullying? Source: "Side note: Sometimes you’ll receive unwanted attention that can cross the line into harassment or bullying." [1]
    • ALT1:... that this (pictured) is a thirst trap? Source: "A refined twist on selfie culture, a thirst trap is often a photo used to entice a response, usually in the form of praise, compliments, or more explicit expressions of ardent desire." [2]

Created by LittleT889 (talk). Self-nominated at 13:43, 11 June 2020 (UTC).[reply]


General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: I don't think ALT1 is very interesting, but ALT0 is fine. 🇪 🇵 🇮 🇨 🇬 🇪 🇳 🇮 🇺 🇸 (talk) 16:31, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image in lead

I am restoring the image to the lead, which was in the initial revision of this article, and was its illustration when it was on the front page as a WP:DYK entry, and clearly holds encyclopedic value as an illustration of the subject matter. I cannot think of any reason to remove this image, or alter it; if anyone has a disagreement beyond WP:IDONTLIKEIT, please feel free to chime in. jp×g 06:10, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why does it have to be a male specifically? There should be a second example of a female, to make it balanced. 84.170.4.142 (talk) 18:15, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
JPxG: I think that this picture, added in September, is a better illustration of the concept. The person in this picture is more specifically trying to "entice [the] viewer sexually", showing his face and more of his body, and doing a sexy pose. The pic that's currently in the article doesn't seem to be trying to "entice" in the same way: the posture is casual, and the phone is covering the person's face. Do you have an objection to me swapping this picture instead? — Toughpigs (talk) 04:05, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, but it would be even better if it were a girl. Benjamin (talk) 16:33, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Strongly disagree with inclusion of any image of some random nobody. There's no justification for posting an image of some random built person (regardless of sex) unless the image itself is a verifiable and notable thirst trap.
The problem otherwise is that English Wikipedia would be making someone "the face of the thirst trap" and that's just not helpful at all. Peter Isotalo 17:37, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's a question of what helps the reader understand the concept. "Thirst trap" is not a self-evident phrase; it's helpful to see an example of what the article is talking about. I agree that it would be preferable to have a more "notable" thirst trap, if there are any that are freely-licensed, but in the absence of an alternative, this is an appropriate illustration. The creator of this picture made the effort to upload it as freely-licensed; if somebody else wants to be "the face of the thirst trap", they could do the same. Toughpigs (talk) 17:44, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Toughpigs, I agree that it's less problematic if someone genuinely contributed the image with the intent of being the illustration of the concept. Is that something we can actually confirm, though?
But then we run into a different problem: "thirst trap" is not really a self-descriptive idea, but something bestowed on an image by others. So how relevant is it to show an image of someone showing off their body unless it's actually been characterized as a thirst trap? Peter Isotalo 17:58, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, if you look at the file page, you can see that the picture is titled "Topless thirst trap.jpg", and the person who uploaded the picture described it: "A topless male "thrist trap" defined by his masculine features such as large muscles and a defined jawline."
For your second point, the article defines a thirst trap as "a type of social media post intended to entice viewers sexually." The defining characteristic is the intention of the poster, not necessarily the reception on the other end. Toughpigs (talk) 18:06, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Thirst trap" isn't an objective, neutral concept, though. It can easily be pejorative just like hipster, social justice warrior or RINO. You're right that it absolutely is about the intention of the poster, but that's not always evident or even agreed-upon. It's also very much about how the image is disseminated; a private image intended only for a partner can be re-interpreted as a thirst trap if it's posted for public consumption.
I think it's morally dubious to use an image of some random anon in an article, even if we can genuinely prove that they've chosen to become The Face of the Thirst Trap. Peter Isotalo 18:46, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]