Talk:W. D. Gaster: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 13: Line 13:


He quite literally doesn’t even appear within Undertale, and I’d assume hardly anyone outside of Undertale/Deltarune fan circles are aware of his existence. This article is only really of interest to diehard Toby Fox theorisers looking for in-universe information, and you can go to fan wikis for that. [[User:FizzleDrunk|FizzleDrunk]] ([[User talk:FizzleDrunk|talk]]) 08:33, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
He quite literally doesn’t even appear within Undertale, and I’d assume hardly anyone outside of Undertale/Deltarune fan circles are aware of his existence. This article is only really of interest to diehard Toby Fox theorisers looking for in-universe information, and you can go to fan wikis for that. [[User:FizzleDrunk|FizzleDrunk]] ([[User talk:FizzleDrunk|talk]]) 08:33, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
:None of this has relevance to [[WP:GNG]].
::None of this has relevance to [[WP:GNG]].
:#A character who does not appear in Undertale is more relevant than a character who does, assuming that the former receives more quality [[WP:SIGCOV]] than the latter.
:#A character who does not appear in Undertale is more relevant than a character who does, assuming that the former receives more quality [[WP:SIGCOV]] than the latter.
:#A lot of subjects are not evident to most people that are clearly notable.
:#A lot of subjects are not evident to most people that are clearly notable.

Revision as of 10:26, 29 April 2024

Is this character notable enough for an article?

He quite literally doesn’t even appear within Undertale, and I’d assume hardly anyone outside of Undertale/Deltarune fan circles are aware of his existence. This article is only really of interest to diehard Toby Fox theorisers looking for in-universe information, and you can go to fan wikis for that. FizzleDrunk (talk) 08:33, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

None of this has relevance to WP:GNG.
  1. A character who does not appear in Undertale is more relevant than a character who does, assuming that the former receives more quality WP:SIGCOV than the latter.
  2. A lot of subjects are not evident to most people that are clearly notable.
  3. Unless the diehard Toby Fox theorisers are the people writing the articles cited (and in some cases, the published papers), that's not really relevant at all. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 10:25, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]