Template:Did you know nominations/Terrance (octopus): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
remove full stop from end of caption (generally, we don't use full stops for captions)
cmt
Line 44: Line 44:
|sign = [[User:Lajmmoore|Lajmmoore]] ([[User talk:Lajmmoore|talk]]) 22:07, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
|sign = [[User:Lajmmoore|Lajmmoore]] ([[User talk:Lajmmoore|talk]]) 22:07, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
}}
}}
: I don't see how the image is relevant since it doesn't actually depict the octopus we're talking about; its use in the infobox instead of the body of the article in question is also questionable. [[User:AryKun|AryKun]] ([[User talk:AryKun|talk]]) 07:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC)


{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 07:15, 28 April 2024

Terrance (octopus)

Photograph of an Octopus bimaculoides
Photograph of an Octopus bimaculoides
Created by Yug (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Yug (talk) 🐲 10:26, 19 April 2024 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

Image eligibility:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article is new enough, long enough, is well sourced to news outlets, and it plagiarism free. There are two notes in the article that need addressing: one "who?" after 'commenters' - please be specific. Also there is a [citation needed], please add a reference. No QPQ is required. Hook is cited, but I'm not sure it is the most interesting option? The striking thing seems to be the connections between the octopus and Tiktok, so perhaps that could be an alternative hook? Picture is free, and the background is clear, but the actual octopus (which is isn't Terrance) is quite blurry. Overall a nice article, thank you! Lajmmoore (talk) 22:07, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

I don't see how the image is relevant since it doesn't actually depict the octopus we're talking about; its use in the infobox instead of the body of the article in question is also questionable. AryKun (talk) 07:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC)