User:Antandrus

View from Gaviota Peak, southeast into Santa Barbara Channel; my house should be visible to the upper left, but it only takes up about a thousandth of a pixel.

Discovered Wikipedia Sunday, April 4, 2004, and began editing pretty much immediately. It was one of the first places I had ever found on the Internet that didn't feel like a waste of time. I've been here now for two years, and I'm still writing. It's fun. Some people don't understand, but then I don't understand why anyone would want to sit for hours in front of a television, either.

More than you want to know about me

Ph.D. in music composition; undergraduate majors in both music and geology (lots of material for puns there); seven years of teaching students (undergrad and graduate) in music theory, music history, orchestration, ear-training, sight-singing, composition, counterpoint, repertoire, and various other subjects; violinist and pianist; former editor of a music research journal; part-time-career as a 21st Century Obscure Composer. After leaving academia, for reasons I won't bore you with, I have increasingly become a musicologist; I have always been fascinated with history, musical trends, the interactions of people and places and ideas; I love figuring things out, and tormenting uninterested friends and relatives with more details about Renaissance Ferrara or Padua or Venice than they can stand. Mercifully, I discovered Wikipedia, and they all thank me for it, for the server complains little when I fill it with abstrusity.

After leaving academia, being unenamored of a life of poverty and struggle as one of thousands of unemployable people with advanced degrees in a humanities field, I acquired some competence in GIS and now manage a department in the same at a huge environmental consulting/engineering shop. Once in a while you might catch me writing about GIS, but for the most part I deliberately stay away.

And I write about:

So far I have been focusing on "early music" (Medieval, Renaissance, and early Baroque), because I love it, I know a bit about it, and until recently, no one else bothered with it. Once in a while I contribute to articles on 20th-21st century composers, music, practice, theory, etc. I usually, but not always, avoid the common practice period, since there are plenty of other contributors capable of writing in this area; why not focus on a spot where I can use my specialized knowledge? A lot of the time when I'm feeling uncreative I do RC patrol and eradicate all the vandalism I can find. It's addictive, and once in a while I have to remind myself to stop and write articles again.

Wikipedia:Babel

This user is an administrator on the English Wikipedia. (verify)

enThis user is a native speaker of the English language.

es-2Este usuario puede contribuir con un nivel intermedio de español.

de-1Dieser Benutzer hat grundlegende Deutschkenntnisse.

pno-4This user is a professional pianist.

vln-4This user is a professional violinist.

vla-3This user is an advanced viola player.

This user contributes using Firefox.

This user contributes using Safari.

This user contributes using macOS.

Search user languages

As a break from music sometimes I write articles on California geography: mountain ranges, river valleys, places I've lived, places I haven't lived, and also sometimes I write on meteorology (I'm kind of a weather nut) as well as geologic stuff, since I studied that as an undergraduate. Also sometimes I click on random page and copyedit, if I don't get hooked on reading. Is anyone else surprised at the sheer amount of things you have learned on Wikipedia? In my opinion this is one of the most wonderful things about this project.

Some other random interests: Classics, literature, history, military history, earth sciences, mountaineering, birds, trees, religious traditions, data forensics, European and eastern philosophy. I read a lot, especially English literature, as well as a lot of stuff in translation. While I'm fairly knowledgeable on topics such as Shakespeare, the existentialist writers, Swift, Greek tragedy, and epic poetry I don't usually contribute to articles on those topics; I don't feel my knowledge is sufficiently encyclopedic. There are other writers here who are better, and who know more, and for now I'm going to leave it there. I would politely ask others to at least consider the depth of their knowledge before tackling detailed subjects around which their own experience is limited; but then who am I to tell other people what to do? Do as you will, says Rabelais, but prepare to be reverted (not by me, necessarily, but by someone who actually has studied the topic). This is an encyclopedia, not a trivia site.

Wikipediholic score (May 3, 2005) currently 146, which is the highest it has ever been. According to the scoring system, I'm officially an addict, but since people keep changing the test (by adding new questions, all of which increase the score) I wouldn't recommend taking it too seriously. Then again, I did take the test, and felt compelled to put the results here.

About the POV warriors

I don't quite understand the political POV-pushers, since it so unnecessarily stressful living that way; but then there really are people on earth who think they Know the Truth. It is common to mistake the death of curiosity and openness for knowledge, but perhaps this is just one way nature is merciful. Not only are things in the world not in black and white, but things in "black-and-white" are not in black and white. Failure to discern shades of gray may be a disability, an incapacity, or a form of cowardice: since it takes a whole lot more courage to see and accept the world with all its messy contradictions, than to view it all as Right, Wrong, Saved, Damned, My Way or the Highway.

My contribs

As of July 6, 2006: 441 articles, of which 364 were from scratch, mostly on Medieval, Renaissance, and early Baroque composers and theorists, as well as musical techniques and forms. 318 of the articles I have listed are on early music; 285 are biographies; 68 are topical overview articles; 24 are about individual pieces of music; only 34 are on 18th or 19th century topics or people. I'm probably about 25% done with finishing the area to my satisfaction, and it's starting to seem like all the low-hanging fruit is gone; now comes the hard work of getting existing articles up to an encyclopedic level of accuracy, detail, and prose style. In general, the whole area of early music on Wikipedia still needs a vast amount of information on just how everything happened, and a lot of articles need to tie in to cultural and political and religious history as well.

I take requests. If you spot something that is missing, or just substandard, and it is in the area of early music--or indeed, in "classical" music in general--let me know and I'll do what I can to help, if it is within my area of competence. Since this is a big area, that's a big "if."

December 12, 2005: single-day record of 500 vandalism reverts. Rah. Now I'm going back to writing articles for a while.

Administrator

My wikistress level is just fine, thank you.

I am an administrator. Drop me a note on my talk page if you need help with something which requires a mop and bucket. In the interest of transparency and full accountability – pretty important things on Wikipedia – you may review all of my administrative actions here: [1]

As of September 2, 2006, I have blocked over 2,000 vandals, and reverted over 22,000 separate instances of vandalism. Some people don't like me for stopping them from having their fun with us, but that's OK: whatever happens, whether I burn out or stay on for a while, I am confident I have done some good for this project.

---

My wikipedia goals:

• Fill out the classical music area in general, and Medieval, Renaissance and Baroque in particular, since the early music area was quite undeveloped when I started.
• Starve the trolls.
• Tithe some of my time helping out with anti-vandalism, voting on deletions and admins, etc., since I think it's a Wikipedian's duty to help out just a bit.
• Stay positive. Laboring in the shadows, unacknowledged, is hard after a while. But take time to acknowledge the good work of others.
• Drink some more wikipedihol. It makes me happy. So there.
• Contribute more content, do less RC patrol. I have a specialized skill, and reverting vandalism is too easy; others can do it. It's curiously satisfying, though, as well as addictive.

---

O my soul, aspire not to eternal life

But rather exhaust the limits of the possible.

Pindar, Odes (Pythian III)

Look round at the courses of the stars, as if

thou wert going along with them; and constantly

consider the changes of the elements into one

another; for such thoughts purge away the filth

of life on earth.

Marcus Aurelius, Meditations, 7:47

The cultivated person's first duty is to always be

prepared to rewrite the encyclopedia.

Umberto Eco, Serendipities, "The Force of Falsity," last sentence.

---

Dedication

All the work I do on Renaissance and early Baroque music is dedicated to the memory of Professor Seamus O'Reilly.

Accipe fraterno multum manantia fletu,

Atque in perpetuum, frater, ave atque vale.

---

Subpages

• My to-do list
• Stuff I have done
• Usual sources for what I write
• Worldview, biases, and all that stuff
• observations on Wikipedia behavior
• Thoughts on Various Subjects, not necessarily Moral and Diverting
• Temporary page for drafts
• page for the Dual License info
• biggish watchlist for classical music related stuff
• Grove quirks Articles which are more extensive in the 1980 Grove than in the 2005 online edition

• 
  Incidentally, has no one awarded you one of these yet? Wow. ... So, a well-deserved barnstar, for your contributions to Wikipedia. Mindspillage (spill your mind?) 05:48, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• 
  For sheer speed of reverting (awarded by Rob Church, 8/27/05
• 
  And not the cheap stuff, either! (Thanks, Mindspillage!)
• 
  The Barnstar of Reversion: thanks to Psy guy! (11/18/05)
• 
  Antandrus is hereby awarded the Vandal Whacking Stick for dealing with the many vandals who "visit" Wikipedia every day in the way that befits them most.
• 
  You really deserve a barnstar for all your work here. ....εγκυκλοπαίδεια* (talk) 18:50, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
• 
  The Barnstar of High Culture: awarded by Sesquialtera II, January 16, 2006
• 
  I bestow the PSI Award to polite, courteous, and helpful users. It is to be used in good mental health! Psy guy
• 
  The Random-Acts-of-Kindness Barnstar: for reverting the vandalism to my user page numerous times, I award you this star thingy KnowledgeOfSelf 05:01, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
• 
  Apples - a healthy part of every Wikipedian's diet! A tasty snack too - especially admins who make a positive difference around here :-) - HC
• 
  Thanks for helping me so much. εγκυκλοπαίδεια* (talk) 19:09, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• 
  I award you the Editor's Barnstar Award, for your blocking of accounts that try to pose as legitimate editors. Thanks -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 03:00, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• 
  ➨ ЯEDVERS awards this Defender of the Wiki Barnstar to Antandrus for reverting personal attacks on sight.
  

The Original Climacus I hereby award Antandrus these neumes for being a swell guy and editing a ridiculous number of articles on early music. -- MarkBuckles 07:11, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I'm here to award you barnstar for fighting with vandalism. I'm so glad about you fight with vandalism. Right now, there are many people vandalize the article, owner's page etc.. Anyways, Thanks for fighting with Vandalism. This pretty Barn-Star was given by Daniel5127, 01:44, 7 May 2006(UTC)

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar For going after IP Vandals Aeon Insane Ward 05:48, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I hereby award you this anti-vandalism barnstar for your tireless contributions towards countering vandalism and making Wikipedia a better place for all. Thanks. :) G.He 02:18, 26 July 2006 (UTC)