User talk:Han Jo Jo

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Han Jo Jo! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Doug Weller talk 12:27, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

July 2018[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like you to assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not do on Talk:Race (human categorization). Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. In both of your talk page posts you impugned other editors. The first post was in response to an editor who made only 2 posts, both to talk pages, and never returned, at least with that account. Doug Weller talk 12:31, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's you that should assume good faith. Han Jo Jo (talk) 20:03, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Race (human categorization)‎ for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. —Paleo Neonate – 10:08, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A note about human race and intelligence articles[edit]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

You should be aware of this if you intended to regularly edit at such articles and their talk pages. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 02:56, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AE notice[edit]

I have opened a discussion about your editing behavior at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Han Jo Jo. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 23:25, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Courcelles (talk) 23:46, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Han Jo Jo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Of course I am here to improve the encyclopedia. Please do not slander me. I indentified an error in an article and got the ICZN to verify it. Of course nobody will contact them, wikilawyering liars know what will happen. Presumably your bloviating editors have more authority. Can I respond to the absurd accusations here Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Han Jo Jo. SMcCandlish is a POV pushing liar who fails to understand the question at issue and just rants about how "race does not exist" irrelevantly. He accuses me of logical fallacies entirely gratuitously to avoid the simple point I am trying to make. You people are an embarrassment and I will expose you all to actual biologists. Han Jo Jo (talk) 13:53, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Wow. Yeah, you are done here. Talk page access revoked. Yamla (talk) 14:26, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.