User talk:MarshallBagramyan

Archives

User_talk:MarshallBagramyan/Archive 1 (27 December 2005 - 29 July 2006) User_talk:MarshallBagramyan/Archive 2 (29 August 2006 - 5 November 2006) User_talk:MarshallBagramyan/Archive 3 (8 November 2006 - 18 March 2007) User_talk:MarshallBagramyan/Archive 4 (22 March 2007 - 9 June 2007) User_talk:MarshallBagramyan/Archive 5 (11 June 2007 - 4 December 2007) User_talk:MarshallBagramyan/Archive 6 (21 January 2008 - 29 July 2009)

Regarding your latest block

I notice that Sandstein made mention of your sockpuppet block ("block for topic-related sockpuppetry") in his attempt to ban you from all Armenia-related articles. The lesson we must learn is that unless an editor challenges in the fullest and in the most public way an unjust, wrong decision, and does it as soon as possible after the event, that decision will eventually and inevitably be presented as an unquestionably correct decision and then used against that editor in a later incident. By not formally challenging the sockpuppetry ban, by Wikipedia's standards you are simply admitting your guilt. You are also allowing the probablility of exactly the same fate to fall onto other editors. Would you please consider making a formal appeal against the sockpuppetry charge. Meowy 21:42, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

I wasn't inspired by Sandstein's previous decisions, but this last [1] seems to be even more unjust, wrong and biased. We need to raise this issue. Gazifikator (talk) 07:00, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Everyone knows that Sandstein is a person who makes no attempt to hide his partisan attitudes. It says much about the type of person who becomes a Wikipedia administrator. Meowy 02:24, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

I know. It's crossed my mind but I'm wary of opening up another appeal which might be shot down. For the moment, I'm deferring the appeal to the Diamond Apex, and am hopeful that he will ultimately launch one in the near-future. Check your e-mail also. Cheers, --Marshal Bagramyan (talk) 23:07, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

But you are the sockpuppetmaster (according to the admin who blocked you) so you should be the one to appeal. And until you appeal, people can go around saying you use sockpuppet accounts. It can't be shot down because there is no evidence. Meowy 00:32, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

My Edits.

Heyo! ) Thank you! :)

• Bu istifadəçi Azərbaycan dilini yüksək səviyyədə başa düşür. - nəzərə alaraq, öz dilimdə müraciət edirəm! ) Dostcasına xəbərdarlıq etdiyin üçün təşəkkür ).

Sülh və ədalət naminə! ;)

Hələlik. --Proger (talk) 22:27, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:SAE set.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:SAE set.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 22:45, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Your DYK nomination of Erebuni Fortress

Can you squeeze out a few more words?—S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 22:52, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Erebuni Fortress

On September 20, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Erebuni Fortress, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 22:07, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Armenians in Crimea

Can you please help me to check grammar of this article. --Hovik95 (talk) 21:23, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

User archives

I've moved them to MarshallBagramyan instead of MarshalBagramyan as they're showing up in the "Ownerless pages in userspace" report. Skier Dude (talk) 22:27, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Nersisyan School

Can you please help me to add and translate information about Nersisyan School form this website. Thank you. --Hovik95 (talk) 20:08, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Kars extreme humid continental climate is on the Köppen climate classification scale "Dfc" not "Dfb".

Kars extreme humid continental climate is on the Köppen climate classification scale "Dfc" not "Dfb". "Dfb" is a category too "warm" for Kars and other cities and towns in that part of Turkey (e.g. Ardahan), as this category correspondents to cities such as Stockholm or Minsk.

This Siberian-type climate is prevalent not only in Northeast Turkey but extends into neighboring Armenia and Georgia as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.104.214.245 (talk) 08:21, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for the update

Since I generally roll back all entries from a destructive account, I will have to leave it up to your expertise on the subject to determine which should be rolled back. If you'd prefer, just let me know which should be rolled back and I'll gladly do so myself. Again, thanks for letting me know. Guy had a real chip on his shoulder, no?  :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 14:57, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

• I'm sorry for the mass reversions; I was simply doing what I always do with such accounts. Believe me, if you reverse some of what I did, it's more than OK with me. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 19:55, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Notice of Armenia-Azerbaijan 2 discretionary sanctions

Further to this complaint at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement, please be notified of the provisions of the Armenia-Azerbaijan 2 arbitration case. Note that this notice is but a neutral point of information of the provisions of the final decision, and not a caution or any type of indictment of misconduct.

---

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to Armenia-Azerbaijan and related ethnic conflicts if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Final decision.

---

This notification has been logged on the final decision page. Yours, AGK 13:27, 20 October 2009 (UTC)