I've looked into it and it looks like you are under a '''general''' 1RR restriction (as well as civility parole and an injunction to "act impeccably"). AFAICT these restrictions were never removed nor were they limited only to Balkan area. Please observe them.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Volunteer Marek|<span style="color:orange;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Volunteer Marek '''</span>]]</span></small> 07:01, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
I've looked into it and it looks like you are under a '''general''' 1RR restriction (as well as civility parole and an injunction to "act impeccably"). AFAICT these restrictions were never removed nor were they limited only to Balkan area. Please observe them.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Volunteer Marek|<span style="color:orange;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Volunteer Marek '''</span>]]</span></small> 07:01, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
== Comments about user behavior at article Talk pages ==
{{ec}} Comments on user behavior are off limits on [[WP:TALK|article Talk pages]]. Article talk pages are restricted to discussion of how to improve the article. I've collapsed a portion of a discussion [[Special:Diff/1081814368|you initiated]] at [[Talk:War crimes in the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine#Consistent source misrepresentation, fake captioning and removal of sourced content|Talk:War crimes in the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine]], because it was exclusively about user behavior. If you need to raise a behavioral issue concerning a user, please start by addressing them at their [[WP:TALK#User talk pages|User talk page]], where such discussions are appropriate. In addition, the section header you chose violated several of the recommendations at [[WP:TALKHEADPOV]], including (bold in the original): '''Don't criticize in headings''', '''Don't address other users in a heading''' and '''Never use headings to attack other users'''. I've reverted the section header to what it was Thanks, [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 07:33, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
This page has archives. Sections older than 56 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present.
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
5% rule
Hello Anonimu. Just an FYI, the 5% rule is only for single-candidate elections – it doesn't apply to parliamentary ones. Cheers, Number57 18:03, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Just wanted to mention that you have reverted two attempts by two different users including me at renaming the page Irina Walker. Note that there have been no previous RMs for this page and you are the only person who has been opposing the move. Do you have a specific reason or are you just asking for a discussion to take place? Keivan.fTalk 22:53, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You mentioned on the AfD that you're planning on proposing the sisters for deletion. If you do, and they end up at AfD, please let me know. --JBL (talk) 15:28, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It’s been about a week since the article on Irina has been deleted. As JBL stated, I was wondering if you were still willing to have the articles about the other two sisters nominated as well, since you argued they had a similar level of notability and I’m sure we don’t wish to discriminate between the sisters. Keivan.fTalk 16:38, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is about WP: VERIFIABILITY, not truth. Unless sources say satellite imagery indicates war crimess, your assumption is just WP:OR.Anonimu (talk) 08:59, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
War crimes in the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine
Aren't you under a 1RR restriction on anything related to Russia? Volunteer Marek 22:01, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Neither Russia nor Ukraine are in the Balkans.Anonimu (talk) 22:04, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh did the one related to Russia expire? Regardless:
Your recent editing history at War crimes in the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.. Volunteer Marek 22:06, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Never had one related to Russia.Anonimu (talk) 22:09, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, you're right! It was a GENERAL 1RR parole/restriction not just limited to Russian topics. Old, but never removed if I understand correctly. Volunteer Marek 22:24, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
My understanding is that it still applies to areas covered by ARBMAC, per notification.Anonimu (talk) 22:39, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Barucha massacre
Your recent editing history at Bucha massacre shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
I've looked into it and it looks like you are under a general 1RR restriction (as well as civility parole and an injunction to "act impeccably"). AFAICT these restrictions were never removed nor were they limited only to Balkan area. Please observe them. Volunteer Marek 07:01, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comments about user behavior at article Talk pages
(edit conflict) Comments on user behavior are off limits on article Talk pages. Article talk pages are restricted to discussion of how to improve the article. I've collapsed a portion of a discussion you initiated at Talk:War crimes in the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, because it was exclusively about user behavior. If you need to raise a behavioral issue concerning a user, please start by addressing them at their User talk page, where such discussions are appropriate. In addition, the section header you chose violated several of the recommendations at WP:TALKHEADPOV, including (bold in the original): Don't criticize in headings, Don't address other users in a heading and Never use headings to attack other users. I've reverted the section header to what it was Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 07:33, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. tgeorgescu (talk) 12:24, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
