User talk:Bomberswarm2

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Bomberswarm2! Thank you for your contributions. I am Dismas and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Dismas|^(talk) 10:31, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gino and Mark Stocco

The article Gino and Mark Stocco has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article fails WP:NOTNEWS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AussieLegend (✉) 05:45, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Gino and Mark Stocco for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gino and Mark Stocco is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gino and Mark Stocco until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AussieLegend (✉) 14:22, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made a change to an article, American Dad!, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Who is Mike Shennan?

Open Mike is not a Wikipedia page. Xx236 (talk) 10:44, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bomberswarm2, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Grayfell (talk) 07:09, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/{{{1}}}]]. The sock account has been blocked per the evidence at SPI. Future puppetry will result in this account being blocked. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:20, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Reverted edit on First inauguration of Lyndon B. Johnson

I removed this statement from the article, which I later found you had added: "As of 2017, it is also the last official inaugration (sic) to take place on a day other than January 20th." That is plainly incorrect because the inauguration of Gerald Ford occurred on August 9, 1974. (Others might also count Reagan's second inauguration and either or both of Obama's, but I wouldn't.) I didn't flag it as vandalism because it seems to have been a mere factual error, quite possibly because LBJ was the last President to be sworn in due to the death of his predecessor (Ford's predecessor Nixon resigned), as well as the last President sworn in by anyone other than a Chief Justice. --RBBrittain (talk) 07:56, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Conflict of Interest regarding User:Bomberswarm2. Thank you. UNSC Luke 1021 (talk) 16:09, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Cheeseburgers were first popularized in the United States during the 1920s and 30s.

I think this user is pretty alright. Bit odd, but totally cool. They are an equal peer and try to stay NPOV. I'm personally glad they are on Wikipedia. Hopefully, this post doesn't bother them. If it does, they can just remove it. XD Endercase (talk) 18:48, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

May 2017

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Rather than calling someone lazy, perhaps read what I actually wrote. I said it's too difficult to go through history to find exactly the most recent occurrence, not finding a reference too difficult; I said the record is too difficult unless ref explicitly states so. Your initial edit of adding the note was incorrect by stating it was the first time in VFL/AFL history and you made an unwarranted assumption, I corrected it by removing it and saying it wasn't true. Please remember before adding information on Wikipedia that everything needs to be cited and please avoid adding incorrect information based on an assumption in the future. Flickerd (talk) 14:12, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

YES

its good to meet someone here! have you heard of PINGAS?75.171.21.21 (talk) 00:39, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Bomberswarm2. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

— Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 12:58, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Template:Z33

WELL DONE

	Filling Wikipedia with biased content and not even trying to hide it award
	please stop filling election pages with pro-republican content Drowningseagull (talk) 10:46, 1 May 2018 (UTC)