User talk:Cavann

Welcome!

Hello, Cavann, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Malerooster (talk) 23:39, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Cavann, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Cavann! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 01:22, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Antiquity

Newsflash: "Antiquity" generally means everything between prehistory and the fall of Rome [1]. The Iron Age is not classical antiquity, but it's still antiquity. It's definitely not prehistory, since there are written records from Anatolia from that period. Athenean (talk) 05:14, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Technically, it starts with Homer (in the 9th century BC according to Herodotus, or 7th or 8th centuries BC according to modern authors); however, since you found a source, it's good. Flows better too. Cavann (talk) 05:23, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

April 2013

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:Istanbul. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 01:52, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

This is funny. Review your own behaviour, especially when you said "Seeing your condition, I don't need to defend anything. I just wish you a speedy recovery." [2] Cavann (talk) 01:55, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Economic predictions in the lead

At Talk:Istanbul you agreed to not include economic predictions in the lead, but now are insisting on keeping them in Turkey. That is intellectually inconsistent.

By the way, many users at AN/I pointed out that you were wrong to use that template on my talkpage. As a sign of good faith and maturity on your part, I would ask that you remove it as you did from Alessandro's talkpage. Don't worry about 3RR, self-reverting is explicitly exempt.

Some other guidelines you might want to familiarize yourself with: WP:DTTR, WP:BRD. My revert of your additions in Turkey was within WP:BRD, once I reverted you should have opened a thread in the talkpage instead of reverting. By the way, I never used WP:CRYSTAL in my revert of you in Istanbul. Athenean (talk) 07:23, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Abstract

Please read the material you just added again. It doesn't matter what they say in the abstract. That isn't part of the article. Quote from the article itself (Which generally is divided into Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, Discussion and Conclusions). I suspect that the sentence you are looking for is in the conclusion.

The abstract is not part of the article. It is only a rough summary of the article. The information in it is ONLY to be used to figure out more or less whether the rest of the paper is worth reading. Abstracts are often written by people other than the author (I've written about 500 myself for other people's articles), and they often contain erroneous information or information that is not in the final version of article, because they are often not updated as the article evolves. They are generally ignored during peer review. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 18:27, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

I have told you I have quoted from within the paper. I also provided a link to the paper. Why didn't you actually check that link before reverting? Now there is a quote Talk:Homosexuality#Bailey_and_Zuk_Paper Cavann (talk) 18:49, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Istanbul shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 23:41, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Actually, you are the one reverting without contributing anything on the talk page. Read those links that you are quoting on my page. Cavann (talk) 23:54, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

DRN request

Hello I'm Cameron11598 and I just wanted to let you know I have closed the Istanbul request at The Dispute Resolution Noticeboard as a matter of procedure due to the ongoing RFC. See the following from the DRN guidelines

We cannot accept disputes that are already under discussion at other dispute resolution forums.

You may file again after the RFC has closed if a consensus has not been reached. If you have any questions leave a MSG at my talk Page or the DRN talk page --Cameron11598 (Converse) 00:14, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Sümela Monastery

Merhaba Cavann! Bu Sümela Manastırı makalesinde ki yunan dayatmacılığı sinirlerimi bozuyor. Ben birçok resmî kaynak ekledim tartışma sayfasına. Soumela ya da Sumela asla kabul edilebilir değil, sadece yunanlaştırma çabaları olarak görüyorum. Resmî kabul gören Sümela Manastırı elbette. Bu konuda taviz verilmemeli.İyi çalışmalar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.213.109.191 (talk) 13:33, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Ingilizce'de ü yok yalniz. Almanya'daki Münih (München) bile Munich diye. Göttingen gibi SIK kullanilir olmasi lazim ingilizce olmayan karakterler icin, Sümela boyle mi? Cavann (talk) 23:09, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Tarafsizlik sorunu

Slm. Turkce vikipedinin koy cesmesisinde bir sikayet yapin. Ordan kullanicilari ingilizce vikipediye getirin. Ayrica sizin 'preferences' gidip bir epostaya eklen:)-83.128.15.240 (talk) 04:19, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Edit warring

Please stop your edit warring and stop stop attacking and intimidating me. Amr ibn Kulthoumعمرو بن كلثوم (talk) 19:22, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Template:World homosexuality laws map. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. StAnselm (talk) 22:39, 23 May 2013 (UTC)