User talk:Charsaddian: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 14:44, 8 January 2024

Welcome!

Hello, Charsaddian!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:25, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for welcoming me :) Charsaddian (talk) 06:29, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello, Charsaddian, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 19:04, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sukesh Chandrashekhar (April 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Compusolus was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sukesh Chandrashekhar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Compusolus (talk) 07:04, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Charsaddian! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Compusolus (talk) 07:04, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion Nominations

Hello, I noticed that you have recently nominated a lot of music-related articles for deletion. In most your only reasoning is "seems non-notable". Wikipedia requires more than that to generate a fruitful discussion, and some evidence is needed that you inspected policies that may have been broken by the offending articles. See WP:BEFORE and WP:ATA. Also, if an article currently has few sources, that does not necessarily mean that none exist. See WP:NEXIST. Thanks. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 13:43, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for the guidance. Proper evidence or reasoning will be provided in nominating articles for AFD in future. Charsaddian (talk) 17:01, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AFD Discussion for Isn't It Now?

Hello - I have expanded this article and added 11 reliable sources. Please review your vote at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isn't It Now?. Thanks! --BRIAN0918 16:35, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'll surely have a look at them. Charsaddian (talk) 17:02, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Charsaddian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is (I am not sure what my exact IP is but in the block message, this IP address is shown 223.123.91.99. I am not using any VPN or any other software. I am using Zong Data Sim for internet usage. I don't know why my IP is blocked because I am using this Data Sim for Wikipedia editing since last few weeks without any problem. Charsaddian (talk) 17:40, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed p2p proxy. See Template:Blocked p2p proxy for more details. Yamla (talk) 20:02, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

AfC notification: Draft:Sukesh Chandrashekhar has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sukesh Chandrashekhar. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:47, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing the draft. I haven't followed the case recently. I will check and see if he has been convicted or not. Charsaddian (talk) 12:11, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thanks for your recent contributions to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2023. Your frequent additions are informative, well-written and greatly appreciated! ツ LunaEatsTuna (💬)— 19:27, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for The Tireless Contributor Barnstar. I believe there is still a lot of work needs to be done in this article. Charsaddian (talk) 19:45, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Masih Shera has been accepted

James Masih Shera, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:23, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sukesh Chandrashekhar (September 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Editor, I think he may meet WP:CRIMINAL but only if Sukesh has been convicted. The article suggests he has only been charged?

You also have problems with the language in this article (i.e. "been lodged in" and "grabbed the headlines".

You are also missing context: when was he imprisoned? is he still imprisoned? who is CM Kumaraswamy?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sukesh Chandrashekhar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 21:17, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Charsaddian. Thank you for your work on James Masih Shera. User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 16:00, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you very much Charsaddian (talk) 19:16, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol newsletter

Hello Charsaddian,

Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!

October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.

PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.

Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.

Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.

Reminders:

You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November Articles for creation backlog drive

Hello Charsaddian:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 2700 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:23, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol \| January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Darren Burke

Hello, Charsaddian,

I'm not sure if there are guidelines to review for new page patrollers pr AFC revoewers but you should know that honorifics like "Dr.", "Prof." or "Ph.D." are not allowed in article page titles except for certain exceptions for royal titles. When you accepted this article, you should have moved it to its present page title. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:00, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Liz

Thank you for the guidance about reviewing articles with honorifics like "Dr.", "Prof." or "Ph.D. Charsaddian (talk) 21:54, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:HeartMath Institute

Hello,

I've replied to your request on my talk page. Thanks! Chase Kanipe (talk) 15:25, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I will review them Charsaddian (talk) 13:12, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Behavioral intelligence

Dear Charsaddian, I saw this article you made but it is not ready for mainspace so I have moved it to a draft. It would be a good idea to use the articles for creation process in future for this draft. I would recommend removing or reducing reliance on primary sources related to Retorio, and using sources meeting WP:MEDRS where possible. I know it is a term used in both business in psychology, and the article should make the distinction between those two types of sources clear. Please also add sourcing as the majority of the article is unsourced and reads as promotional. The topic is clearly notable, and I'm confident with these improvements it will be ready for mainspace in the future. Thank you Darcyisverycute (talk) 17:12, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the message. I will check the draft again. Charsaddian (talk) 17:27, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Draft: Daniel W. Greear

Hey Charsaddian! Thank you for taking the time to review my submission. You noted two reference errors in my submission. Those have been fixed. Would you mind looking over the draft again? Draft: Daniel W. Greear

@@ Line 271: / Line 271: @@
 :Thank you for the message. I will check the draft again. [[User:Charsaddian|Charsaddian]] ([[User talk:Charsaddian#top|talk]]) 17:27, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
+== Regarding [[Draft: Daniel W. Greear]] ==
+Hey Charsaddian! Thank you for taking the time to review my submission. You noted two reference errors in my submission. Those have been fixed. Would you mind looking over the draft again? [[Draft: Daniel W. Greear]]