User talk:Cs california: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Notice: Copying from public domain sources without attribution on Monge v. Maya Magazines, Inc..
Line 66: Line 66:
[2] no idea how to find a specific location photo in that commons, not willing to spend hours trying to learn
[2] no idea how to find a specific location photo in that commons, not willing to spend hours trying to learn
::{{ping|User:JGlendening}} I don't know what you are doing but you did edit the page as shown in the history[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pfeiffer_Big_Sur_State_Park&oldid=1036549669 here]--[[User:Cs california|Cs california]] ([[User talk:Cs california#top|talk]]) 07:52, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
::{{ping|User:JGlendening}} I don't know what you are doing but you did edit the page as shown in the history[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pfeiffer_Big_Sur_State_Park&oldid=1036549669 here]--[[User:Cs california|Cs california]] ([[User talk:Cs california#top|talk]]) 07:52, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

== November 2021 ==

[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Thank you for [[Special:Contributions/Cs california|your contributions]]. It seems that you may have added [[Wikipedia:Public domain|public domain]] content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as [[:Monge v. Maya Magazines, Inc.]]. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia [[Wikipedia:Plagiarism|guideline on plagiarism]], such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at [[Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources]], including the usage of an [[:Category:Attribution templates|attribution template]]. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. <!-- Template:Uw-plagiarism --> — [[User:Diannaa|Diannaa]] ([[User talk:Diannaa|talk]]) 14:55, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:55, 20 November 2021

Click here to leave a new message

Discussion

Anthony Chabot article

Hi CS california, It looks like you edited the Anthony Chabot article to include a caption on the photograph, but the caption indicates the photo is of someone else. I assume that's a mistake but didn't want to change it in case you know better than me. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anthony_Chabot&oldid=975941536 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zacacox (talkcontribs) 02:36, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You know you can just check the history for the picture and fix it --Cs california (talk) 01:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

famousbirthsdeaths.com as a source

Hi Cs california. I noticed that you recently used famousbirthsdeaths.com as a source for biographical information in IDubbbz. Please note that the general consensus as expressed at WP:RSN is that it does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. I've gone ahead and removed it. If you disagree, let's discuss it. You may want to check WP:RSP and WP:RSN to help determine if a source is reliable. Thanks.--Hipal (talk) 21:24, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sindee Jennings requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sindee Jennings. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. • Gene93k (talk) 20:32, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sindee Jennings for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sindee Jennings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sindee Jennings (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DGG ( talk ) 19:37, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cattleya mendelii

I had to do a lot of patching up of your stub Cattleya mendelii. I think that Plants of the World Online is a better source to base articles off of than Tropicos. Abductive (reasoning) 20:00, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fossil iguanas

Howdy - looks like you added these four vague genera mentions to Iguanidae a while ago. Was there anything specific that these were supposed to link/be sourced to? Cheers --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 21:41, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I just took them from what was already on wikipedia with their authority reference. If you think they are not correct remove them and change the linked page also --Cs california (talk) 22:18, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Editor's Barnstar
Thank you for adding pics to articles of places in Albania. Now those articles are more beautiful :) Cheers, Ktrimi991 (talk) 02:39, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

False photo added to Pfeiffer BIg Sur State Park page

I believe you are the person responsible for adding the top photo on the current Pfeiffer Big Sur State Park wikipedia page, which is in a "protected" area. FYI photo is not of Big Sur State Park but of Pfeiffer Beach environs, which is USFS operated, not state parks. And photo is not of Big Sur River, which goes through Pfeiffer Big Sur SP but reaches ocean elsewhere, in a different state park, not at Pfeiffer Beach.

@JGlendening: Is there a reason why you cannot change it to another picture from the Commons media page with the edit button? --Cs california (talk) 23:42, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[1] no "edit" button on that section, internal text says "protected" [2] no idea how to find a specific location photo in that commons, not willing to spend hours trying to learn

@JGlendening: I don't know what you are doing but you did edit the page as shown in the historyhere--Cs california (talk) 07:52, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Information icon Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Monge v. Maya Magazines, Inc.. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:55, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]