User talk:DePiep: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:38, 12 December 2013

	The Special Barnstar
	For your thoughtful, poetic contribution about learning chemistry, and the value of informative categories in science. You have my respect. Sandbh (talk) 11:52, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
	For creating the 'recent changes' pane for WPMed. Wonderful! LT910001 (talk) 06:34, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Non-metallic Barnstar for improving the Periodic Table You've done a whole damn lot for our project. You've actually made it better. Please keep up.--R8R Gtrs (talk) 17:53, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

		What a Brilliant Idea Barnstar
		For turning the trivial names of groups table in the periodic table article into a visual feast for the eyes Sandbh (talk) 13:43, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

		The Template Barnstar
		For repeated improvements on templates used in phonetics articles. Particularly admirable is the combination of seeking out explicit consensus and dutifully carrying out necessary changes once it is reached. — Æµ§œš¹ _{[aɪm ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɛ̃ɾ̃ˡi]} 14:51, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

		The Guidance Barnstar
		You're the hero of the day on this pickle of a problem. Thanks for the insight. Van Isaac_WS^contribs 23:50, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
	For your amazing work with the graph. It appears now better than what I thought of it to be before! With your learning ability, you're all up to be an awesome graphic designer, in addition to your template skills! Thanks, man R8R Gtrs (talk) 16:07, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The Socratic Barnstar
		Thank you for all your suggestion and opinion (as here or here) which are really very helpful. Tito Dutta (talk) 13:52, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

THIS today is edit #50000 by DePiep on en:WP.
-DePiep (talk) 16:58, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16

A barnstar for you!

Thanks, sandbh. A nice start this is when I logged on. And thanks for inventing some scientific base for my periodic table. -DePiep (talk) 08:50, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to top. -DePiep (talk) 11:40, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Todo in periodic tables

Books: make complete & check. add legend to table (+their books). -DePiep (talk) 11:42, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Chem picture PT: big cells
wide PTs

**Periodic tables in wide templates**
Template	Option separate legend?	Legend name
`{{Periodic table (atomic weight)}}`	Yes
`{{Periodic table (Aufbau principle model)}}`	No	Has no legend
`{{Periodic table (extended)}}`	Yes
`{{Periodic table (extended, large)}}`	Yes
`{{Periodic table (large version)}}`	Yes
`{{Periodic table (Pyykkö model)}}`	No	Has no legend
`{{Periodic table (Pyykkö model, large)}}`	Yes
`{{Periodic table (superactinides)}}`	No	Has no legend
`{{Periodic table (superactinides, by Pyykkö)}}`	No	Has no legend
`{{Periodic table (wide large)}}`	Yes	"wide" here refers to table layout (f-group is inline)
`{{Periodic table (period 7)}}`	No

{{Periodic tables footer}} into navbox

Disambiguation category

Hi, DePiep,
There is some code that is causing one of your user pages (User:DePiep/T pseudo ns) to be tagged with Category:Wikipedia disambiguation but I can't figure what it is. This is not a category for user pages so if you could remove this categorization, that would be great. Thanks! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:43, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, will turn it off. Thx for the message. -DePiep (talk) 07:19, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Convert templates

I came across Category:Subtemplates of Template Convert/wrapper templates while talk-page stalking. {{Chembox MeltingPt}} and {{Chembox BoilingPt}} both do conversions via hard-coded functions. IIRC, they actually pre-date the standard {{convert}} suite, and have a different behavior in the use of hyphen vs endash for range/negative values. WP:CHEM has kicked around changing that for years, you'll definitely want to coordinate there with any changes (the Chembox template suite is large and complicated). DMacks (talk) 03:22, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. -DePiep (talk) 07:20, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request for help

Hi DePiep! I tagged you on a discussion on WPMED. I've been having a bit of trouble creating the society and medicine taskforce (Wikipedia:WikiProject_Medicine/Society_and_medicine_task_force) for WPMED. Other taskforces are able to get an article assessment table created (for example, here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Cardiology task force/Article assessment), but I'm not sure about how to go about doing this. I've created the categories and added one or two articles. How are articles automatically added to the categories? How does one get the assessment table? I've been flummoxed for months and would appreciate any help you can give, or a reference onwards to a third party or place on this website. Kind regards, --LT910001 (talk) 03:47, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Will pick up shortly. -DePiep (talk) 07:03, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --LT910001 (talk) 12:51, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See the talkpage. Couldn't get the bot working today. -DePiep (talk) 14:45, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your invitation to contact you. If I could magically use bots, I'd use a bot to tag every article with the taskforce:

any article simultaneously under WP:BIO and WP:MED
any article simultaneously under WP:COMPANIES and WP:MED

That should net the majority of the articles we wish to catch. Thanks again for your help! --LT910001 (talk) 15:38, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Periodic table

Just to let you know that I shall be away 15-23 Dec. Petergans (talk) 13:46, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is there something you expect me to do? I thought you were watching the demos & discussions:

This is group 3 & gap -- about the 18-column table, and the asterisks

/sandbox shows a proposed group 3 and f-block arrangement

This is a !vote about group 3 and group 12. I'd guess you would want to contribute there. If I understand you well, you would oppose aspects, but I have not read you there. Sort of warning: that discussion rolls on, and may lead to a conclusion. Not in days, but possibly in weeks. -DePiep (talk) 13:57, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Metalloid

Hi DePiep: I'm doing a tidy up of the metalloid article. You may see some unusual activity associated with these refinements e.g. I just edited the metalloid border periodic table template. Tx, Sandbh (talk) 11:42, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits would not disturb me any moment. Usually I'd take a look afterwards. -DePiep (talk) 11:54, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 162: / Line 162: @@
 ::Thanks! --[[User:LT910001|LT910001]] ([[User talk:LT910001|talk]]) 12:51, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
 :::See the talkpage. Couldn't get the bot working today. -[[User:DePiep|DePiep]] ([[User talk:DePiep#top|talk]]) 14:45, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
+Thanks for your invitation to contact you. If I could magically use bots, I'd use a bot to tag every article with the taskforce:
+* any article simultaneously under [[WP:BIO]] and [[WP:MED]]
+* any article simultaneously under [[WP:COMPANIES]] and [[WP:MED]]
+That should net the majority of the articles we wish to catch. Thanks again for your help! --[[User:LT910001|LT910001]] ([[User talk:LT910001|talk]]) 15:38, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
 == Periodic table ==