User talk:Drmies

A kitten for you!

This newbie has important 'stuff' to drive you bonkers with. Can you really just bury your head in the sand? Of course you can - and should - when your sanity is a stake! Should you flush WikiLove messages? Of course you can/should. In fact, I'm gagging on it even as my cursor hovers above the send button.

Uh-oh... I don't think I can resist the compulsion.

Iryna Harpy (talk) 01:04, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Query

Have you left Wikipedia? If so, I am extremely sorry to hear this and can only wish you the best of luck. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 01:11, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

• Come back soon, mon vieux. We really can't operate without your sanity/reality-check. See you soon. Softlavender (talk) 06:12, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

• I'm hoping that the lack of a retirement message means that he's in need of a detox... and that it's not a permanent decision. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 09:18, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Drmies Eric Corbett has been unblocked, although he now says he intends to leave. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 10:04, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

• Drmies, no, not you too! Please come back as soon as you feel ready! --Tryptofish (talk) 17:51, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

I remember

This editor has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian on 20 February 2012.

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:24, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

i hope you detach, relax and feel the world for a while

I dont know why you are sticking your head in the sand (cartoon on your user page) but without words it looks like sulking. i really hope you take a wikibreak to detach and relax !

• when you first met me 15 september 2015, you bit me
• and when I asked why and questions
• you chose to attack without edit summary, accused me of WP: PA,WP:Fringe
• while others called my questions straightforward questions, reminding you to focus on content.
• you replied to a single one of my questions (not why you were posting here, as an editor or admin that had to decide about my 3RR report of an editor), you said that not using blogs as sources was "a bit narrrow-minded", but that "Our BLP is pretty sacred to me" and yet you returned to justifying your taking-exception-to-the-BLP rule with "but like everything else we have for policies and guidelines it needs to be read in context", so arguing back and forth and back.

i can only imagine that you acted extremely emotional. but more than a month later, to this day, you never said you were sorry.

i hope you detach for a while, and feel the world for a while.--Wuerzele (talk) 22:09, 24 October 2015 (UTC)