User talk:Georgia guy/Archive 2

Archive: User talk:Georgia guy/Archive 1

United States article nomination

I still would like a response or offer a clearer explanation for your objection to the nomination. --Ryz05 _t 02:12, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

I still would like a response as to what you think. Thank you.--Ryz05 _t 17:42, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

I still would like a response or a change of vote. Thank you.--Ryz05 _t 23:09, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

The thing is that some are objecting because of the size while others object because of its comprehensiveness, so it is unfair either way. Also, just about every article (especially that on a popular topic) is vandalized. Finally, citations are important as references. I ask you to reconsider your vote. Thank you.--Ryz05 _t 23:21, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

My userpage

You can't tell, that's the point. It's a practical joke. Mr. Lefty _{Talk to me!} 01:48, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Rapunzel Unbraided

If it stops people dumping other articles that are just as speculative (if not more) and pointing to this as valid precedent for inclusion, despite the patent policy failings. 81.104.165.184 13:23, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

270

Say, Georgia guy, do you have an opinion on 270? Anton Mravcek 22:13, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism is a strong word...

...so don't use it lightly. In this case, I think the anonymous contributor had simply been taught si instead of ti (I've heard it both ways), so we shouldn't call it "vandalism" or assume any malicious intent. —Keenan Pepper 22:18, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

As I have pointed out, repeatedly, and will continue to do so, this user has a long history of calling ANY edit that he either does not understand or does not agree with vandalism. But, he's also very dilligent with correcting *actual* vandalism. But it does give one the appearance of crying wolf. Zero sharp 18:36, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

per your inquiry on my talk page, please see [[1]] Zero sharp 19:54, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Moscow Metro edit war

And what exactly does it mean, if I may ask? I mean we have already had a poll, with pretty clear results. Sorry if I'm answering your message in a wrong way or in a wrong place —Sascha. 19:45, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Answer to your question on Talk:English_language

No, I don't think so.... Glad you haven't given up yet! Cultural Freedom talk 07:18, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

olympics

They sent my yacht club (the brigantine yacht club) a letter saying that.

D-flat Minor

No I can't unfortunately (I am not an expert in this area) which is why I suggested that such information be added to the article. But it must logically exist and this seems to confirm that it is at least recognized by people who know more than I do.

Looking on Google, music does exist in this key, for example: [2] and there is at least one Rachmaninov piano concerto [3]. Gwernol 18:25, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

(Very sorry about dropping that on your user page by accident. Mea culpa. Gwernol 18:38, 13 June 2006 (UTC))

List of Disney theatrical animated features

Yeah, some people are just oblivious, either accidentally or deliberately. If that anon makes that edit again, I'll probably semi-protect the article. —tregoweth (talk) 21:59, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Missing Template

I am temporarily adding a yet nonexistent template because I want to add the colors to the template that use that template. The template {{Shades of brown}} will be installed shortly after I copy the colors into it. Otherwise, I would have to go to each page, get the color, go back to the template and insert the color, finish and save the template, then go back to all the pages I just visited and re-edit them to add the link to the template. I might miss one of them the other way. This would seem to be more efficient. Paul Robinson (Rfc1394) 21:35, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Template:Infobox_Color

Changing the spelling from 'color' to 'colour' is not "Vandalism".

see Wikipedia:Vandalism#What_vandalism_is_not: "Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Apparent bad-faith edits that do not make their bad-faith nature inarguably explicit are not considered vandalism at Wikipedia. For example, adding an opinion once is not vandalism — it's just not helpful, and should be removed or restated." Zero sharp 22:01, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Sorry

 I just put the link on the 5th PBS ident to prove acurracy. But I apologise if I inconvenienced you

in any way, shape or form. Thank you.

--68.83.23.173 20:11, 27 June 2006 (UTC)68.83.23.173, 16:07 PM Tuesday, June 27, 2006

Re: 2016 Summer Olympics

Sorry, I got distracted. I'm doing it now. Neonumbers 23:21, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

tv stations

ok...i'll get on it. can you help me with it, though? File:Ca-on-wd.gif User:Raccoon Fox Talk 19:15, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Moscow Metro

Um, that's not really ridiculous, because it's his own table. If he doesn't support his own table then I take it back.lensovet 21:45, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Valeria Novodvorskaya

The person in question is explained in article. It is an iconic image presentely used to show a behaivoural trend. Like one user we know of. --Kuban Cossack 00:48, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Warning messages

Hey, nice work warning the vandal Pido1337, you might want to use the templates listed at WP:VAND instead though. Keep up the good work.--Andeh 18:34, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Intent of creator of category

Found it: "BTW It's supposed to be a parent to two subcategories, not actually listing articles. -- User:Docu" from Category talk:Women --Usgnus 23:46, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Just want you know that I respect your position on this matter even though I disagree. --Usgnus 02:07, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Clarification of Stance on Moscow Metro

Can you please clarify your stance on the Moscow Metro table fiasco? Please indicate your support for either Table 1 or Table 2 (or indifference for which table goes in the article) by commenting in the vote section of Talk:Moscow Metro#Final poll. -- joturner 13:58, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Request for Mediation for Moscow Metro

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee in regard to the article Moscow Metro. Mediation Committee procedure requires that all parties to a mediation be notified of the mediation, and indicate an agreement to mediate within seven days. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Moscow Metro, and indicate your agreement or refusal to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation.

-- joturner 05:24, 15 July 2006 (UTC)