User talk:GretLomborg
GretLomborg, you are invited to the Teahouse!
|
Hi GretLomborg! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:03, 30 May 2017 (UTC) |
Core Socialist Values
Thank you for your improvement of my page and your suggestions.邬山 (talk) 01:53, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Web.config
Hello GretLomborg. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Web.config, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: not about a website but about a configuration file, probably can be merged to ASP.NET or similar. Thank you. SoWhy 13:24, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
- OK, sent it to AfD instead with your merge suggestion. - GretLomborg (talk) 05:20, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
About "the mess with WikimediaFrance"
https://www.mathisbenguigui.eu/wikimedia-timeline/ Cobra bubbles (talk) 14:13, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Clean-up
Hi,
Just as an FYI, I am going through articles that were created by E.R - and have started a list of articles she created at User:CaroleHenson/sandbox1. Thanks for all that you have been doing!–CaroleHenson (talk) 18:38, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
- OK, thanks and you're welcome! - GretLomborg (talk) 20:05, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Jonathan E. Grindlay has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
DGG ( talk ) 23:58, 13 June 2019 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Teesdale Mercury has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SamHolt6 (talk) 14:20, 16 July 2019 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Alan Gregg (medical doctor) has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
97198 (talk) 12:52, 9 August 2019 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Harvard Surgical Unit has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Chetsford (talk) 16:07, 11 August 2019 (UTC)Casa Grande Test Range
Hey, I pulled a 1975 conference paper from Interlibrary Loan that describes the Casa Grande Photogrammetric Test Range as "The Casa Grande Photogrammatic Test Range was established in the mid-sixties to test the dynamic performance of aerial cartographic cameras. A discussion of-the test range design and the field surveys required to establish it is presented. In addition, the photogrammetric procedures normally used to test aerial mapping cameras using the range are presented."
Paper reference was found here: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19780015553/downloads/19780015553.pdf
A76-3B511 The Casa Grande Photogrammetric Test Range. D. D. Byars (Defense Mapping Agency, Washington, D.C.). In: American Society of Photogrammetry and American Congress on Surveying and Mapping, Fall Convention, Phoenix, Ariz., October 26-31, 1975, Proceedings. Falls Church, Va., American Society of Photogrammetry, 1976, p. 162-176.
Information cited is here: https://archive.org/download/the-casagrande-photogrammetric-test-range/THE%20CASAGRANDE-PHOTOGRAMMETRIC%20TEST%20RANGE.pdf
All the pieces leading away from the Corona solution were there.
Since you're a neutral party with these edits, I wanted to ask if you'd provide objective interpretation of this paper and decide what's best for the Wiki page. The amount of bounce changes between Corona and non-Corona information shows me this is a hot-potato. Byemancontrol (talk) 04:26, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
- I thought that was an excellent source, and moved the article based on the name it used. Sorry I didn't respond earlier, I just saw this message. GretLomborg (talk) 07:19, 4 March 2022 (UTC)