User talk:IIlIlIl: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 19:31, 27 April 2024

This is IIlIlIl's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pennington Family (April 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:GNG, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pennington Family and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 03:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IIlIlIl! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 03:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should be fixed. Thanks! IIlIlIl (talk) 08:01, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Muncaster Castle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry Percy, Earl of Northumberland. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Muncaster castle

I have reverted your edits to Muncaster castle because you have deleted referenced material (particularly the bit about the artworks stored there during WW2) and have added unreferenced material. You could help yourself by providing an edit summary when you make changes as then other editors could see what you are trying to do.

I appreciate that nobody likes being reverted, but it happens to all editors – so please don't be discouraged. In my view, it's generally better to get started in Wikipedia in smaller steps. ThoughtIdRetired _TIR 07:27, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will change it back as many times as I have to. Cheers :). IIlIlIl (talk) 08:03, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Sir John Frecheville Ramsden, 6th Baronet discussed proposed modifications to the castle with Edwin Lutyens from 1916, but nothing came of these; Lutyens did design the Muncaster War Memorial, constructed in 1922, on a commission from Ramsden." was the only thing deleted as it pairs in historical context to the added sourced material. If you want to debate it, YOU are showing how ignorant you are. Make sure you get your claim right and know your history. Cheers. :) IIlIlIl (talk) 08:15, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You absolutely may not change it back as many times as you have to. That is edit-warring, and it will get you blocked. Please instead discuss the changes you're making that others are objecting to on the article's talk page. Valereee (talk) 14:23, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And nor can you touch my edits just because you want to. I did my research, do yours. You can assume whatever you want but tell me not to... be quiet. IIlIlIl (talk) 19:30, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Please stop. If you continue to assume bad faith when dealing with other editors, as you did at Wikipedia:Teahouse, you may be blocked from editing. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:44, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can do what you want, I literally have infinite accounts. You crying because I held someone accountable says more about you. Cope and seethe. Nonetheless, someone came towards me with attitude and ignorance and I matched them and corrected them. Simple. IIlIlIl (talk) 19:25, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also the bitter cold irony coming from this is wild. Be quiet. IIlIlIl (talk) 19:27, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Valereee (talk) 19:31, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 54: / Line 54: @@
 :You can do what you want, I literally have infinite accounts. You crying because I held someone accountable says more about you. Cope and seethe. Nonetheless, someone came towards me with attitude and ignorance and I matched them and corrected them. Simple.  [[User:IIlIlIl|IIlIlIl]] ([[User talk:IIlIlIl#top|talk]]) 19:25, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
 ::Also the bitter cold irony coming from this is wild. Be quiet. [[User:IIlIlIl|IIlIlIl]] ([[User talk:IIlIlIl#top|talk]]) 19:27, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
+{{Tmbox
+| style = background: #f8eaba
+| image = [[File:Sock block.svg|55px]]
+| text  = '''''This account has been [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] indefinitely''''' as a [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry|sockpuppet]]&#32;that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry#Legitimate uses|allowed]], but using them for [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry#Inappropriate uses of alternative accounts|''illegitimate'']] reasons '''is not''', and that all edits made while evading a block or ban [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy#Evasion of blocks|may be reverted or deleted]].  If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by first reading the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on the page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code> below. [[User:Valereee|Valereee]] ([[User talk:Valereee|talk]]) 19:31, 27 April 2024 (UTC)<!-- Template:SockBlock -->}}