User talk:Jweiss11

Your question on my page

My reason for considering lifting your T-ban for Andy Ngo was, and remains, that I don't want any editor to have to constantly worry whether they're violating a T-ban or not. Therefore, I'm willing to replace your topic ban with an article ban from Andy Ngo and Talk:Andy Ngo. No gray areas there. Please note that an article ban would apply to any and all editing of the pages in question: don't correct a typo or change punctuation, don't revert vandalism. Nothing. You may discuss Ngo anywhere else on Wikipedia, with the caveat that if you discuss him a lot on other pages, or (I don't mean to ABF, but) appear to be skirting the article ban in some way, I may restore the full topic ban. Though not without a warning first. Would that suit? Feel free to instead appeal at AE or AN for an unconditional lifting of the T-ban, if you prefer. Bishonen | talk 16:11, 7 January 2020 (UTC).

Do you accept this proposal? I forgot to say that I don't think an article ban would need to be indefinite. A year would work for me. Bishonen | talk 12:47, 9 January 2020 (UTC).

Bishonen, thanks for getting back to me. I'd really like to clean to slate and have the sanction removed entirely at some point. Are you proposing that you commute the topic ban to an article ban now and then lift the sanction entirely a year from now? Jweiss11 (talk) 01:19, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Yes. Bishonen | talk 12:04, 10 January 2020 (UTC).

How about we change to article ban now and lift the entire sanction one year from its start, September 11, 2020? Jweiss11 (talk) 22:10, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

I've taken a good look at your previous edits to Andy Ngo and its talkpage, and I'm OK with that suggestion. Your topic ban from Andy Ngo has been commuted to an article ban per my specifics above, to run from now to September 11, 2020. Bishonen | talk 12:15, 11 January 2020 (UTC).

Excellent. Thanks. Jweiss11 (talk) 18:16, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

You're welcome. Logged here, in case anybody asks. Bishonen | talk 19:42, 11 January 2020 (UTC).

Harvard Crimson football 1901

Parke Davis' selection for 1901, as published in the 1935 Spalding's Foot Ball Guide (which he himself edited until his death), was Harvard. (Reference: Okeson, Walter R., ed. (1935). Spalding's Official Foot Ball Guide 1935. New York: American Sports Publishing Co. p. 233.) I own a copy of the 1935 Guide. Thus, Billingsley and Davis, the other two retrospective selectors, both chose Harvard. Jeff in CA (talk) 00:44, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Jeff, thanks for dropping a line. Seems there may some confusion about the Parke Davis champ for 1901. See 1901 Yale Bulldogs football team and College football national championships in NCAA Division I FBS. @Cbl62: thoughts here? Jweiss11 (talk) 00:49, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

If any team can lay claim to a 1901 national championship, it's the 1901 Michigan Wolverines football team, of course. That said, the official 2019 NCAA Record Book says that Parke Davis declared Yale, not Harvard, as his 1901 national champion. See here at p 113. Cbl62 (talk) 03:28, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

I wonder if the NCAA just made a typo, as 1901 Harvard Crimson football team went 12–0 and beat 1901 Yale Bulldogs football team, who finished 11–1–1. Jweiss11 (talk) 06:11, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

@Cbl62: @Jeff in CA: I picked up a copy of the 1935 Spalding's Foot Ball Guide and can confirm that Jeff is correct. Page 233 only makes mention of Harvard being Davis's national champ for 1901. I suspect the Yale thing is just an error in the NCAA records. Should we edit Parke H. Davis, 1901 Yale Bulldogs football team, George S. Stillman, Yale Bulldogs football, College football national championships in NCAA Division I FBS to reflect this? Jweiss11 (talk) 18:58, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

My desire, for the sake of accuracy, is to edit those articles to reflect this. I picked up copies of the 1939 and 1941 Football Guides and the 1989 and 1992 NCAA Football records books. I also searched the 1995 Official Records Book at Google Books. 1941 was the first year that the guide was not published by Spalding, although it was still edited by Walter Okeson. The format was changed, and it no longer included Parke Davis' selections of "Outstanding Nationwide and Sectional Teams." The 1939 Guide also did not include Davis' list. In both the 1989 and 1992 records books only a few major selectors are listed (Dickinson, Dunkel, Williamson, Litkenhous and Helms). In the 1995 records book, Davis' selections appear (with the 1901 error) in the format in which they are listed in the recent books. I strongly suspect that this error dates to the first appearance of Davis' selections in the annual records book. Note that Davis' picks in 1900 and 1902 did include Yale. Jeff in CA (talk) 23:11, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

I also purchased and checked the 1934 Spalding Guide, and for 1901, Parke Davis' list states, "Harvard." Jeff in CA (talk) 01:35, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

If both of you are unequivocally convinced of this error, I have no objection to editing the impacted pages. However, there should be some explanatory footnote on both the Yale and Harvard pages making note of the discrepancy in NCAA records. Cbl62 (talk) 21:05, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

–present formatting

"–present" is supposed to be included; see any article on politicians and other people with terms for this. The lack of them in coaching navboxes was some archaic style that somehow was kept alive over the years. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 03:40, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

@Dissident93: I don't know that's it's "archaic". I know "present" was intentionally omitted from college sports tenure navboxes, where the current formatting for all these sports navboxes was first developed, circa 2010. There are well over 1,000 such navboxes using that format across college and pro sports. Can you show me an example of a politician or other occupational tenure navbox with parenthetical years that uses "present"? Jweiss11 (talk) 03:45, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Well, do you remember why they were omitted? Also, just check any current-tenured leader's (president/prime minister/CEO, etc) article and you should see it. (some quick examples include Donald Trump, Boris Johnson, and Jeff Bezos) Any ongoing event, like wars and conflicts, also use this formatting, such as the Iraqi conflict (2003–present) and the War in Darfur. Do you know of any non-sports examples that do the same? Because otherwise I just see this as somebody's old personal preference that became a sport-related standard in an era when we had less guidelines and policies. And how come we only omit this in navboxes and not the actual articles of the same subjects? I simply fail to see why we should continue to use this formatting. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 05:41, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

I don't see any navboxes with parenthetical years in any of those articles. I believe the main rationale for omitting "present" in the navboxes was to reduce clutter. Whatever the case, it's not appropriate to just decide that the 32 NFL coach navboxes are an exception to a standard implemented on well over 1,000 sports tenure navboxes; see everything downstream from Category:Sports coach navigational boxes and Category:Sports executive navigational boxes. We should have a discussion first. Also, I believe that you misused the rollback feature in reverting my edits. Jweiss11 (talk) 05:50, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Most viewed Michigan Wolverines football articles in 2019

See User:Cbl62/Most viewed Michigan Wolverines football articles in 2019. It would be great to find a way to automate a list like this. I prepared it manually. Feel free to add anyone (or anything) who you think I may have missed (my criteria was > 10,000 page views). Cbl62 (talk) 22:38, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Jan 22: WikiWednesday Salon NYC

January 22, 7pm: WikiWednesday Salon NYC

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-9pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop at Metropolitan New York Library Council in Midtown Manhattan. Is there a project you'd like to share? A question you'd like answered? A Wiki* skill you'd like to learn? Let us know by adding it to the agenda. Wednesday January 22 WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC (optional RSVP on-wiki). 7:00pm - 9:00 pm at Metropolitan New York Library Council (8th floor) at 599 11th Avenue, Manhattan We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Wikimedia New York City Team 20:07, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Michigan bowl game navbox

Someone is adding a Michigan bowl navbox to player bios. E.g., here. This strikes me as wrong since the players are not listed in the navbox. Thoughts? Cbl62 (talk) 23:15, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Certainly wrong. Should be removed. I’m away from a computer the next couple days. Can you drop that editor a note? Thanks, Jweiss11 (talk) 00:04, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Done. I hope you enjoy your time away from the computer. Cbl62 (talk) 02:19, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Saturday Jan 25: Met 'Understanding America' Edit-a-thon @ Metropolitan Museum of Art

Jan 25, 12:30pm: Met 'Understanding America' Edit-a-thon @ Metropolitan Museum of Art

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for the Met 'Understanding America' Edit-a-thon @ Metropolitan Museum of Art on the Upper East Side. Together, we'll expand Wikipedia articles on American history and art, and the understanding that all communities bring to American culture, as reflected in the Met collection up until ca. 1900. With refreshments, and there will be a wiki-cake! Open to everyone at all levels of experience, wiki instructional workshop and one-on-one support will be provided. Saturday Jan 25 Met 'Understanding America' Edit-a-thon @ Metropolitan Museum of Art (RSVP on-wiki or at meetup.com). 12:30pm - 4:30 pm at Uris Center for Education, Metropolitan Museum of Art (81st Street entrance) at 1000 Fifth Avenue, Manhattan (note this is just south of the main entrance) Galleries will be open this evening until 9 pm, and some wiki-visitors may wish to take this opportunity to see exhibits together after the formal event. Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends, colleagues and students! --Wikimedia New York City Team 21:01, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

George H. Garrey

I reverted your additions to George H. Garrey because they appear to fail WP:V. Have you seen any reliable sources stating he coached for Stevens Point? It's very possible that {{Wisconsin–Stevens Point Pointers football coach navbox}} is incorrect. And even if it can be determined that he coached for a single season, I think a head coach statistics box is unwarranted and lends undue weight to a relatively minor aspect of his biography. Garrey is most known for mining geology: his article should thus not look like that of a college coach. His 4–1 season, if verifiable, can simply be stated in text. Cheers, --Animalparty! (talk) 23:25, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

@Animalparty: Thanks for the message. I agree about the lack of verification on Garrey being the Stevens Point coach in 1899. All we have is the Steven Points athletic website indicating that a "Mr. Garrey" was the head football coach in 1899; see here. @Bigredlance: did you ever find anything more conclusive that this George H. Garrey is the guy here? Animalparty, on the other issue, I disagree about the head coaching table, if the connection can be proven. That's a standard table that is included on every bio article for a college football head coach, irrespective of what else they were notable for. Many coaches in the 1800s and early 1900s only coached for a short time before going into other fields like academics, politics, law, finance, medicine, or the military, and often becoming at least as notable or more so in those other fields, e.g. Lucius Littauer, Harry Arista Mackey, William R. Blair, Frank W. Milburn, Fred W. Green, Evans Woollen, Arthur B. Woodford, Thomas Cochran (banker), and many more. Jweiss11 (talk) 01:16, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

My apologies for stalking. I suspect that, based on searches, that the Mr. Garrey may actually be Walter E. Garrey, George's brother and a former Chicago football player who in 1899 was studying for a Ph.D and would have potentially taken a coaching job for some easy money.108.21.182.146 (talk) 21:41, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

108.21.182.146, no worries. That's great info. Jweiss11 (talk) 21:46, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Edits

Hi- Just out of curiosity, are you tracking my edits or something, and if so, why? 108.21.182.146 (talk) 16:41, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Yes, I have looked at your edits a few times as you are editing college football coaching bio articles, most of which I have spent time on in the past. Can you check out the formatting edits I've been making to your additions? Thanks, Jweiss11 (talk) 16:43, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

I respect the candor. I will work on my formatting, my apologies for that.108.21.182.146 (talk) 16:45, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Also I am probably going to be making an account soon. FYI so you don't think I'm being a sockpuppet. I will let you know the username when it is created, though I will not want to publicly link it to an IP address for obvious reasons. Once I do I will not be making any edits from this or other IP addresses.108.21.182.146 (talk) 16:48, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

No worries. I'm happy to discuss any points of style you might have questions or issues with. I was just about to suggest that register you an account. You seem like you have a lot to offer the project (e.g. that nice research you dug up about the Garrey brothers of Chicago). Jweiss11 (talk) 16:50, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. That research was nothing. 15-20 min. 108.21.182.146 (talk) 17:02, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

I made an account. Thanks.FlaviusFunderburke (talk) 21:42, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Overcapitalization

Is there a reason why, as in this diff, you frequently change "football" to "Football" in categories? It strikes me as overcapitalization since football is not a proper noun. Cbl62 (talk) 19:20, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

I'm aware it's not a proper noun and would never do this for any sort of displayed content, but my understanding is that for category sort keys, each word is supposed to be capitalized. There's probably something turnabout this buried somewhere in the archives of Wikipedia talk:Categorization. Jweiss11 (talk) 19:24, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Template:1903 Midwestern college football independents records

There seems to be an error in Template:1903 Midwestern college football independents records. When it loads into an article, this happens. Any idea what happened here? Cbl62 (talk) 07:29, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Given the successful outcome on the first round of deletion discussions for the independents templates, feel free to nominate 1891-1904 ... or wait until we knock out a few more ... your call. Cbl62 (talk) 20:37, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

@Cbl62: I've nominated 1889 thru 1905 here. Jweiss11 (talk) 19:27, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joseph A. Meyer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Notre Dame Fighting Irish basketball (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:27, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

CFB talk page

Did you see my response and counter proposal? Thoughts? FlaviusFunderburke (talk) 02:39, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020

Hello Jweiss11,

Source Guide Discussion

The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.

Redirects

New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.

Discussions and Resources

• There is an ongoing discussion around changing notifications for new editors who attempt to write articles.
• A recent discussion of whether Michelin starred restraunts are notable was archived without closure.
• A resource page with links pertinent for reviewers was created this month.
• A proposal to increase the scope of G5 was withdrawn.

Refresher

Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sam Barry.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sam Barry.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Feb 19: WikiWednesday Salon NYC

February 19, 7pm: WikiWednesday Salon NYC

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-9pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop at Metropolitan New York Library Council in Midtown Manhattan. Is there a project you'd like to share? A question you'd like answered? A Wiki* skill you'd like to learn? Let us know by adding it to the agenda. Wednesday February 19 WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC (optional RSVP on-wiki). 7:00pm - 9:00 pm at Metropolitan New York Library Council (8th floor) at 599 11th Avenue, Manhattan We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Wikimedia New York City Team 21:00, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 –dlthewave ☎ 06:05, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

March 2020

Hello, I'm Dlthewave. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Race and intelligence, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. (concerning this edit) –dlthewave ☎ 04:29, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

I did no such thing. I restored content written by other editors. Please stop with spurious template warnings here. Thanks, Jweiss11 (talk) 05:47, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

You are responsible for the content that you add, regardless of whether it was originally written by somebody else. The diff shows that you restored unsouced content. –dlthewave ☎ 05:59, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

I've again removed the Global variation of IQ scores section as it was restored without explanation and the sourcing and off-topic issues have not been addressed. If you would like this content to be included, I would suggest that you add sources that demonstrate how it pertains to the Race and intelligence topic. Additionally, your "hostile and disruptive" accusation has no place on an article talk page; please save these personal comments for user talk or noticeboards. It is neither hostile nor disruptive to ask an editor to provide sources for content that they have added. –dlthewave ☎ 13:31, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Edit warring warning

Right now you and another editor appear to be in a slow motion edit war over whether or not to include a Global variation of IQ scores section at Race and intelligence. A slow motion edit war is still an edit war. If the ongoing discussion about the section cannot produce a clear enough consensus I would encourage you to try other methods of dispute resolution. Continued edit waring may result in other sanctions. Barkeep49 (talk) 15:32, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

AE Notice

I've opened an Arbitration Enforcement request regarding your conduct at Race and intelligence. The discussion can be found at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Jweiss11. –dlthewave ☎ 19:34, 4 March 2020 (UTC)