User talk:M5Ehistory: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
Line 30: Line 30:
:::I’m so sorry sir but it’s misunderstanding, the whole issue is those trying to change the informations without evidence and I’m sorry about those words and never i will use those words I will keep polite and watching my words sir 🌹. [[User:M5Ehistory|M5Ehistory]] ([[User talk:M5Ehistory#top|talk]]) 23:36, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
:::I’m so sorry sir but it’s misunderstanding, the whole issue is those trying to change the informations without evidence and I’m sorry about those words and never i will use those words I will keep polite and watching my words sir 🌹. [[User:M5Ehistory|M5Ehistory]] ([[User talk:M5Ehistory#top|talk]]) 23:36, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
::::That's not a misunderstanding. You made a conscious decision to attack another editor repeatedly, which displays a lack of judgment that reflects upon your ability comply with our policies. It indicates that you're willing to be uncivil in order to push your preferred version of an article. Your apology notwithstanding, I don't see any evidence that you actually understand what you did wrong other than using bad words, which does not give me a great deal of confidence that unblocking you would result in anything other than further problems down the line. That said, if another administrator disagrees with me, they can respond to your unblock request as they see fit. [[User:Swatjester|<span style="color:red">⇒</span>]][[User_talk:Swatjester|<span style="font-family:Serif"><span style="color:black">SWAT</span><span style="color:goldenrod">Jester</span></span>]] <small><sup>Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!</sup></small> 23:41, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
::::That's not a misunderstanding. You made a conscious decision to attack another editor repeatedly, which displays a lack of judgment that reflects upon your ability comply with our policies. It indicates that you're willing to be uncivil in order to push your preferred version of an article. Your apology notwithstanding, I don't see any evidence that you actually understand what you did wrong other than using bad words, which does not give me a great deal of confidence that unblocking you would result in anything other than further problems down the line. That said, if another administrator disagrees with me, they can respond to your unblock request as they see fit. [[User:Swatjester|<span style="color:red">⇒</span>]][[User_talk:Swatjester|<span style="font-family:Serif"><span style="color:black">SWAT</span><span style="color:goldenrod">Jester</span></span>]] <small><sup>Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!</sup></small> 23:41, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
:::::But I don’t know at all the issue is from that guy is keep saying false info and on my whole I haven’t validated and of Wikipedia policies so again I’m sorry I don’t meant and you should block that user too to be fair because he started the discussion without any evidence so again sorry for that [[User:M5Ehistory|M5Ehistory]] ([[User talk:M5Ehistory#top|talk]]) 23:57, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:57, 31 March 2024

March 2024

Information icon Hello, I'm Leonidlednev. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Baloch people in the United Arab Emirates—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 16:16, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Baloch people in the United Arab Emirates. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 16:20, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Baloch people in the United Arab Emirates, you may be blocked from editing. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 16:22, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide an enough sources for this 🌷. M5Ehistory (talk) 16:23, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Omani Baloch. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sutyarashi (talk) 06:46, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Admin report

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Mteiritay (talk) 20:58, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for personal attacks and WP:NOTHERE to build an encyclopedia constructively..
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 21:32, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

M5Ehistory (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

i’have not done anything wrong and always adding references on the pages and real sources to deliver the truth information to reader and prevent vandalism on pages.M5Ehistory (talk) 23:26, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=i’have not done anything wrong and always adding references on the pages and real sources to deliver the truth information to reader and prevent vandalism on pages.[[User:M5Ehistory|M5Ehistory]] ([[User talk:M5Ehistory#top|talk]]) 23:26, 31 March 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=i’have not done anything wrong and always adding references on the pages and real sources to deliver the truth information to reader and prevent vandalism on pages.[[User:M5Ehistory|M5Ehistory]] ([[User talk:M5Ehistory#top|talk]]) 23:26, 31 March 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=i’have not done anything wrong and always adding references on the pages and real sources to deliver the truth information to reader and prevent vandalism on pages.[[User:M5Ehistory|M5Ehistory]] ([[User talk:M5Ehistory#top|talk]]) 23:26, 31 March 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

M5Ehistory (talk) 23:26, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you understand that telling other users to "stfu" and to "go to hell" as you did here is unacceptable behavior and an egregious violation of our policies against personal attacks and incivility?Do you likewise understand that demanding other users to "take a DNA test" and 'splaining to them where their family's come from, as well as calling them foolish and accusing them of lying, that *none* of that is acceptable behavior on this project? SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 23:32, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I’m so sorry sir but it’s misunderstanding, the whole issue is those trying to change the informations without evidence and I’m sorry about those words and never i will use those words I will keep polite and watching my words sir 🌹. M5Ehistory (talk) 23:36, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's not a misunderstanding. You made a conscious decision to attack another editor repeatedly, which displays a lack of judgment that reflects upon your ability comply with our policies. It indicates that you're willing to be uncivil in order to push your preferred version of an article. Your apology notwithstanding, I don't see any evidence that you actually understand what you did wrong other than using bad words, which does not give me a great deal of confidence that unblocking you would result in anything other than further problems down the line. That said, if another administrator disagrees with me, they can respond to your unblock request as they see fit. SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 23:41, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But I don’t know at all the issue is from that guy is keep saying false info and on my whole I haven’t validated and of Wikipedia policies so again I’m sorry I don’t meant and you should block that user too to be fair because he started the discussion without any evidence so again sorry for that M5Ehistory (talk) 23:57, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]