User talk:MrX

MrX

MrX	talk	articles	photos

Talkback

Hello, MrX. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers#BACKLOG.
Message added 00:00, 1 April 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Speedy deletion nomination of Sons of Thundr (Faith Baptist Church)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sons of Thundr (Faith Baptist Church) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. – S. Rich (talk) 04:10, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Sons of Thundr (Faith Baptist Church) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sons of Thundr (Faith Baptist Church) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sons of Thundr (Faith Baptist Church) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TomStar81 (Talk) 05:48, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

You're too experienced

You're too experienced to be baited into an elaborate defense of what's already been firmly established as consensus text to reflect mainstream views on the Russian interference article. SPECIFICO talk 21:02, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Yeah, no kidding. What sources are these people actually looking at? - MrX 21:05, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dangerous book cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dangerous book cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Audiohub.gr

Hello MrX

I am trying to understand a bit more about rules and exceptions, could you please provide your experienced feedback on this matter? Panagiotis Karavitis (talk) 15:56, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Sure. The applicable guideline is WP:WEB, In short, for material published on the web to have its own article in Wikipedia, it should be notable and of historical significance. Articles in reliable sources (newspapers, magazines, published books, news web sites) are needed to show that it is notable and historically significant. Press releases and routine coverage do not count.- MrX 16:12, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Naagin (Geo Kahani)

Hi MrX - You moved the Naagin (Geo Kahani) article as I was prodding it - I received no edit conflict warning, so I have ended up as the article creator and prodder (!!) Can you re-move it without leaving a redirect, or do I need to use AFD? - Arjayay (talk) 11:46, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi Arjayay. I can't remove it myself, but I've nominated it for WP:CSD#G6.- MrX 11:54, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks - I was about to blank it and speedy it G7 - but didn't want another edit-conflict - I'm not sure what extra rights "extended mover" and "file-mover" gives you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:01, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

recent edits on Natural Progression Series, Super Strong Style 16, Progress World Cup, NGW Undisputed Championship, NGW Tag Team Championship, NGW GenX Championship

Im the TheBuilder456 do you have a problem with the articles that i created Natural Progression Series, Super Strong Style 16, Progress World Cup, NGW Undisputed Championship, NGW Tag Team Championship, NGW GenX Championship because you want to delete them so can you delete the discussion please if the articles have a problem why you don´t improve it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheBuilder456 (talk • contribs) 19:48, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi TheBuilder456. I nominated your articles for deletion is because the subjects of the articles do not seem to meet our inclusion guidelines. Our goal is to include articles about subjects that are already notable. The information that I placed on your user page provides some additional information about our policies and content guidelines, as well as advice on creating your first article. May I ask, are you being paid to write these articles? If so, you should be aware of our conflict of interest guidelines and our policy that requires you disclose any paid editing. See WP:PAY for more information.- MrX 20:44, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Articles

Actually No, I'm not being paid, I'm making out of love this articles, and my objective here in Wikipedia is to make it great in British Wrestling and so everything I put here on Wikipedia are subjects that I think it really matters, and the NGW articles well they are notable (in opinion), including the PROGRESS' tournament articles because PROGRESS is a very notable promotion in the UK. So that's why I'm making those articles.

TheBuilder456 (talk) 11:30, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

1RR broken on 2017 Jerusalem Light Rail stabbing

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2017_Jerusalem_Light_Rail_stabbing&diff=776955352&oldid=776955190 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2017_Jerusalem_Light_Rail_stabbing&diff=776954923&oldid=776954622 Please self revert.--Shrike (talk) 13:18, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Done.- MrX 13:36, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

I was not sure if you was alerted if yes then my apologies.--Shrike (talk) 13:28, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

I know, but thanks for making it official.- MrX 13:29, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Marisha Wallace

I had previously declined an A7 speedy on Marisha Wallace. I believe that the statements in the article constitute a Credible Claim of Significance. I have therefore reverted your tagging. Please take this to AfD if you think it should be deleted (and I freely admit that as it stands it does not establish notability). DES ^(talk) 02:11, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

OK. I didn't see the previous A7 decline. Thanks for letting me know.- MrX 02:13, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Question

Hi! I am completely new to Wikipedia and I just got a notification that the page I made, Findo, Inc., was deleted. I was wondering if there is any way you could send me the content of that page (because I lost the copy of it) and help me edit it in a way I could publish it in Wiki, I didn't mean to make it sound promotional!

Sorry! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marina chilingaryan (talk • contribs) 22:38, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi Marina chilingaryan. I only nominated the article. It was deleted by Nick. You can ask him for a WP:REFUND here.- MrX 23:06, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

survey

Thanks for commenting on DT regarding the survey. It sounds like you support B4. If you've the time, and inclination, can you please ivote here? I don't know if your comment at the bottom of the thread will count. Thanks. SW3 5DL (talk) 20:53, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

OK.- MrX 20:59, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Big Baller Brand

Thank you for your help to improve Big Baller Brand! --BigCheese41 (talk) 19:19, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

You're welcome BigCheese41!- MrX 19:35, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, MrX. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australian Cannonball Cup.
Message added 03:30, 7 May 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Request for you to revisit the discussion, per sources presented therein. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:30, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Sandy Dian

Hello MrX. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Sandy Dian, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: multiple credible claims of significance in prior revisions (speedy deletion requires all revisions to meet the criteria). Thank you. SoWhy 12:29, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

@SoWhy: I know that all revisions are considered in speedy deletion nominations. I just didn't find any of the subject's career accomplishments to be significant. I sent the article to AfD.- MrX 14:13, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

You do realize that per WP:MUSICBIO #10 creating a musical piece that is used for a notable TV show or a notable film makes a subject even notable? I fail to understand why you think significance is not indicated when claims of notability exist. Care to elaborate? Regards SoWhy 16:28, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

That's a rather weak notability criteria, and I have no knowledge of whether the listed television programs are notable or not. I also searched for his name and nick name before nominating the article for speed deletion.- MrX 17:01, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Leah Soibel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saint Louis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Add stalking now

You've never edited the Scott Pruitt article in your entire editing history, yet you revert my edit today after only a few minutes after I made it. (WP:Wiki-stalking much? Feelings hurt at my Talk? Why don't you work out your issues some other way?) --IHTS (talk) 20:01, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Oh, I hardly think so. You are far too insignificant for me to want to stalk. Minimal effort on your part would have revealed that I edited the talk page four months before you ever touched the article, and it has been on my watchlist since. Now kindly go away, I'm trying to build an encyclopedia with people who want to work together toward that goal.- MrX 20:12, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Well that's a relief. I'm sure then your revert had nothing to do with hurt feelings. (I mean, what a cognizant editsum to justify it! You're an amazing editor. So NPOV and all. Oh excuse me for eating your time, you have more liberal POV to slant articles with ...) --IHTS (talk) 20:24, 9 May 2017 (UTC)