User talk:PeterTheFourth

Hello! If there's any reason you'd like to contact me, feel equally free to leave me a comment here or wikimail me- I should be able to reply fairly quickly in either case.

Arbitration enforcement

I felt it necessary to bring some of your recent edits to the attention of the arbitrators.[1] Rhoark (talk) 21:37, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Hello PeterTheFourth, I have just closed the AE thread concerning your conduct. As I said at AE, I find the edits you made to Gibson's biography problematic; they are pretty much a textbook violation of BLP, in that contentious information concerning a living person was removed from an article on BLP grounds and you reinstated it repeatedly without getting consensus first. Please, be more careful in future when making edits concerning living people. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 14:27, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Absolutely, I should have been more careful in that instance. I'll be so in the future. PeterTheFourth (talk) 23:41, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Galobtter (pingó mió) 09:37, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Special Barnstar
		For the best talk page question I've seen in 10 years of editing. Toddst1 (talk) 03:40, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Whoah. Thanks dude! PeterTheFourth (talk) 04:14, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Jordan Peterson RfC

Hi there. I was quite astonished to see your edit here which undid an edit made relating to the closure of the RfC on Talk:Jordan Peterson. Am I correct in thinking that the edit was made without discussing this on the talk page, with the closing editor (feminist) or on a noticeboard (perhaps WP:AN)? feminist is an experienced editor who was not involved in the RfC and so had every right to close the discussion; moreover, the closure looks like it correctly assesses consensus to me. — Bilorv_(c)(talk) 02:09, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

The RfC was the discussion. Thanks so much for sharing your valuable opinion on the discussion. PeterTheFourth (talk) 02:17, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Gab (social network)". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 31 October 2018.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 01:43, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Pudeo (talk) 08:17, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Gab (social network), to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, User:TransporterMan (talk) 20:29, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)