User talk:Petrarchan47

SEMI-RETIRED

This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.

disruptive whitewashing on Who's Who

If you continue removing sourced criticism despite repeated reverts from other editors, I will ask an uninvolved admin to block you at WP:ANI. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:58, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Some of your changes weren't as bad as I thought – I saw massive swathes of content vanishing from the article, as when you previously removed all mention of the various scams. Some of your edits were actually removing unsourced content, which I shouldn't have reverted. So, for that, I apologize for being too hasty (and clearly not reading the diffs well enough). Still, you need to stop edit warring to remove sourced content from that article. Hold an WP:RFC, raise the issue at WP:NPOVN, or do something else to establish consensus. Showing up every few weeks to blank sections is disruptive. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:23, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Whitewashing is a pretty serious charge. The difference between my version and yours is two paragraphs - in your version you re-added the following but changed nothing else:

”One example was the Who's Who Among American High School Students which was criticized for questionable nomination practices as well as whether the listing's entries are fact-checked and accurate.[10][11] According to the admissions vice president of Hamline University, "It's honestly something that an admissions officer typically wouldn't consider or wouldn't play into an admissions decision," adding that "Who's Who... is just trying to sell books".[11]

Who's Who publications are not all of questionable value, but publishers that select truly notable people and provide trustworthy information on them are hard to identify. A & C Black's Who's Who is the canonical example of a legitimate Who's Who reference work, being the first to use the name and establish the approach in print, publishing annually since 1849. However, the longevity of a publication is not in itself a guarantee. In 1999 Tucker Carlson said in Forbes magazine that Marquis Who's Who, founded in 1898 but no longer an independent company, had adopted practices of address harvesting as a revenue stream, undermining its claim to legitimacy as a reference work listing people of merit.[12]”

The example of a high school scam comes from low quality sources: 1 and 2 I left it out of my version for that reason, and because this is a short, list-style article, thought mentioning every single instance there was a printed complaint about some version of a “who’s who” wasn’t necessary. I don’t think you can call this whitewashing when I’ve already addressed the scams in the Lede and body in a way you yourself found (nearly) sufficient.

The second paragraph you re-added was from Tucker Carlson, known as a conspiracy theorist and to my knowledge, not allowed on WP as a source. My removal of Carlson is not whitewashing to my knowledge, but perhaps I’ll check with the RS notice board to make sure.

Your paragraphs also make me wonder about the author, as they seem less reliant upon RS and sound very editorialized. The quotes selected are not neutral, considering how Carlson’s statement in my initial comment above wasn’t included whilst it would give the reader much better context. (“ “There are cases-- relatively few in our judgment--of individuals with decidedly modest vocational achievement being included in the Who's Who volumes.”)

“Whitewashing” should be reserved for describing the removal of negative content. What I’ve done is to try and present the facts in a balanced way. This was what I was trying to clean up - and my fix is nearly identical to the present one, so how am I the problem? petrarchan47คุก 14:38, 12 April 2022 (UTC) [Copied from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Who%27s_Who#NPOV_problem]

Precious anniversary

Precious

Two years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:03, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Dear Gerda, such a jewel you are. Thank you petrarchan47คุก 14:41, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Minor correction, though ~ I began editing in 2013 petrarchan47คุก 15:01, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Barnstar Awarded!

		The Environmental Barnstar
		Awarded in recognition for your legacy work on the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and other environmental articles. Also thanks for joining WP:Environment last month, with more editors like you, the WP will thrive. Hoping to see you a bit more, cheers! Jusdafax (talk) 04:17, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

JusDaFax What an honor, thank you, mon ami. Let me know if I can help in any way on environmental articles. I’m quite out of the loop, so please feel free to offer some guidance. It would be wonderful to work with you again. petrarchan47คุก 01:13, 28 June 2022 (UTC) Jusdafax

Welcome back! ―Buster7 ☎ 13:08, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi Buster! Thank you so much. How are things? Hot and steamy here, but the morning glories are finally blooming. Any word from our dear friends? petrarchan47คุก 23:04, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Discussion re-opened

Just as heads up that I have recently re-opened a discussion you participated in back in 2019. The question was about whether the article about Jeffrey Epstein’s island should include content about a science conference Stephen Hawking happened to be part of. You seemed to support the inclusion, mainly because two other editors supported the inclusion. Since then, those two editors have been indefinitely banned from the Wikipedia, and an investigation in to their bans shows that the two editors had problems with editing about conspiracy theories or WP:BLP related issues. That in mind, I have removed the problematic content from the Little Saint James, U.S. Virgin Islands article, since there is no longer consensus for its inclusion. Samboy (talk) 22:40, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

{

{font|text=~~~ Merry Christmas! ~~~|font=Century Gothic|size=30px|color=#bf00bf}}

Joyeux Noël! ~ Buon Natale! ~ Vrolijk Kerstfeest! ~ Frohe Weihnachten!
¡Feliz Navidad! ~ Feliz Natal! ~ Καλά Χριστούγεννα! ~ Hyvää Joulua!
God Jul! ~ Glædelig Jul! ~ Linksmų Kalėdų! ~ Priecīgus Ziemassvētkus!
Häid Jõule! ~ Wesołych Świąt! ~ Boldog Karácsonyt! ~ Veselé Vánoce!
Veselé Vianoce! ~ Crăciun Fericit! ~ Sretan Božić! ~ С Рождеством!

Hello, Petra! Hope all is well with you and yours. Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! ―Buster7 ☎ 20:17, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Fan Mail

As you say at Gandy's page ...its good to know you are doing well

―Buster7 ☎ 05:00, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

-Three years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:13, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Unblock request as established user

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Petrarchan47 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Requesting an IP block exemption as established user; IP block due to IP "anonymizing proxy" range petrarchan47คุก 21:08, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Requesting an IP block exemption as established user; IP block due to IP "anonymizing proxy" range <b style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px #B8B8B8">[[User:Petrarchan47|<span style="color:#A0A0A0">petrarchan47</span>]][[User talk:Petrarchan47|<span style="color:deeppink">คุ</span>]][[Special:Contribs/Petrarchan47|<span style="color:orangered">ก</span>]]</b> 21:08, 9 August 2023 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Requesting an IP block exemption as established user; IP block due to IP "anonymizing proxy" range <b style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px #B8B8B8">[[User:Petrarchan47|<span style="color:#A0A0A0">petrarchan47</span>]][[User talk:Petrarchan47|<span style="color:deeppink">คุ</span>]][[Special:Contribs/Petrarchan47|<span style="color:orangered">ก</span>]]</b> 21:08, 9 August 2023 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Requesting an IP block exemption as established user; IP block due to IP "anonymizing proxy" range <b style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px #B8B8B8">[[User:Petrarchan47|<span style="color:#A0A0A0">petrarchan47</span>]][[User talk:Petrarchan47|<span style="color:deeppink">คุ</span>]][[Special:Contribs/Petrarchan47|<span style="color:orangered">ก</span>]]</b> 21:08, 9 August 2023 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}