User talk:Primefac

This is Primefac's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46: 15 days

Odd issue

Hi, I've run across an odd issue, and have no idea how to track it down, or even where to report it. See Talk:Jazz Chisholm Jr.#The Bahamas link hover image graphic is a medical image, not a flag of the Bahamas, which should be self-explanatory. Thanks. BilCat (talk) 17:02, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@BilCat, WP:VPT#Incorrect preview images. Izno (talk) 17:04, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! BilCat (talk) 17:07, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit summary at arb case

I saw it when checking notifications and will do that, but am likely to be tied up for the rest of the day (PST) with a RL deadline. What I am here to ask is how urgently you need those links fixed. By the evidence deadline, obviously, but is this more urgent than GizzyCatBella at the Collaboration article? I have also been meaning to ask whether anyone actually cares about 2018-2019 edit wars or content disputes at the Collaboration article. I think that academically, the fact that objections to content discussed as blood libel were being dismissed may explain a great deal about the passion of the disputes, but I don't know that they are actionable, don't personally think that they should be actionable this many years later, and was myself blissfully unaware of all of it at the time, so I could easily miss something. I think they may have preceded sanctions for some editors, for example. I do think I can find the part where people were complaining in edit summaries about references getting separated from their text, if that is relevant. LMK about that at your convenience. Like most of the other participants I think, I still find it unclear whether the committee wants to address whether real problems existed and why, or who needs to be sanctioned. Because most of the stuff I know about could be considered as either content OR behaviour. Or both. Elinruby (talk) 21:09, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Had a look at that section now: are the links you want me to fix the ones to talk pages? Elinruby (talk) 10:42, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Found the html comment. This is no longer an issue Elinruby (talk) 23:05, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – April 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).

Administrator changes

Aoidh

KillerChihuahua

CheckUser changes

Ferret

Guideline and policy news

A community RfC is open to discuss whether reports primarily involving gender-related disputes or controversies should be referred to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

Technical news

Some older web browsers will not be able to use JavaScript on Wikimedia wikis starting this week. This mainly affects users of Internet Explorer 11. (T178356)
The rollback of Vector 2022 RfC has found no consensus to rollback to Vector legacy, but has found rough consensus to disable "limited width" mode by default.
A link to the user's Special:CentralAuth page will now appear in the subtitle links shown on Special:Contributions. This was voted #17 in the Community Wishlist Survey 2023.

Arbitration

The Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 case has been closed.
A case about World War II and the history of Jews in Poland has been opened, with the first evidence phase closing 6 April 2023.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox ideas and changes

In light of recent debate on modifications to Template:Infobox rugby biography, I've expanded it to include other issues that demand attention. As you frequently contribute to rugby union articles, please feel free to respond with your suggestions for improving the most recent discussion on the templates talk page. Kidsoljah (talk) 18:40, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'm keeping an eye on the discussion. Primefac (talk) 19:31, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for you!

		*The ~~(information removed)~~* Barnstar**
		Thanks for keeping Wikipedia free of sensitive information! The Oversighters are some of the best Wikipedians around! Zoe Trent Fan 🎤💍 19:27, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aww, thanks! Primefac (talk) 19:30, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help

Thanks for trying to fix my problem with the menus running down the side of the screen. I finally found the answer: reduce the zoom to less than 150%. More details are on my talk page, but THANKS for trying to fix a non-issue. :-) WesT (talk) 00:30, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Always happy to help :-) Primefac (talk) 07:12, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Need help on Draft

Hi Prime, can you look into Draft: Prakash Neupane. Additionally, i have left some information on Talk page too. Have a good day. DIVINE (talk) 19:58, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you asking me to review the page, or is there something specifically you would like me to look at? Primefac (talk) 20:09, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t know if it’s on your interest to review or not. As it has been so long and the mainspace is locked you can review it or you can look into sources if they are enough to prove notability. Regards, DIVINE (talk) 05:50, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't really do reviews on-demand unless there's a compelling reason; this draft appears to have been improved since the last decline, so I feel that sticking to the normal processes is best here. Primefac (talk) 05:56, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Accidental rollback at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Armenia-Azerbaijan 3/Proposed decision

I accidentally rolled back your latest edit at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Armenia-Azerbaijan 3/Proposed decision. I was able to self-revert, but I didn't think could edit that page. Does someone need to check my permissions? Donald Albury 15:34, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) @Donald Albury: Well, you're not allowed to edit it; but if, indeed, you choose to defy the will of The Gods ;) you're physically able to do so—it's not protected. HTH! SN54129 15:44, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, case pages generally aren't protected, so stuff like this occasionally happens. No harm no foul :-) Primefac (talk) 18:31, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The idea behind leaving case pages unprotected being that they need to be open to Superclerk Bishzilla in case she wishes to make some improvement. bishzilla _ROARR!! pocket 01:30, 16 April 2023 (UTC).[reply]

History merge

Hi Primefac, thanks a lot for the response to the Socket SP6 request at WP:RFHM! Is it safe now to CSD G7 my sandbox if I wish to do so? — AP 499D25 (talk) 10:18, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I can take care of that for you. Primefac (talk) 10:20, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am confused

I thought phase 1 evidence was closed? Did I miss a memo? While I am here asking newbie questions, phase 2 is for rebuttals of previously submitted evidence? Do I have that right? Thanks for your time, Elinruby (talk) 00:15, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]