User talk:Qubacubazamniauser: Difference between revisions
→Mia Tindall: Reply |
→Mia Tindall: maybe longer |
||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
:IT LOOKS LIKE I WAIT 20 WHOLE OTHER YEARS [[User:Qubacubazamniauser|Qubacubazamniauser]] ([[User talk:Qubacubazamniauser#top|talk]]) 08:54, 27 April 2024 (UTC) |
:IT LOOKS LIKE I WAIT 20 WHOLE OTHER YEARS [[User:Qubacubazamniauser|Qubacubazamniauser]] ([[User talk:Qubacubazamniauser#top|talk]]) 08:54, 27 April 2024 (UTC) |
||
::Maybe longer. At this point, this child is the daughter of notable parents whose notability comes from their excellence in their chosen profession. The fact that her extended maternal family has a lot of very notable people is in no way a guarantee that she herself will become notable during her life. [[User:Risker|Risker]] ([[User talk:Risker|talk]]) 16:05, 27 April 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:06, 27 April 2024
April 2024
Hi Qubacubazamniauser! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Celia Homeford (talk) 10:09, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank u I tried my best but thing I’m not trying do vandalism I’m trying to make simple edits page is missing Qubacubazamniauser (talk) 05:10, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sarah, Duchess of York. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Celia Homeford (talk) 08:26, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- U aldready made lose edit privileges I asked fix something but u did not Qubacubazamniauser (talk) 00:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Omega nugget (April 7)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Omega nugget and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, Qubacubazamniauser!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:59, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Omega nugget (April 11)
The article Princess Alexandra of Hohenlohe-Langenburg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Celia Homeford (talk) 07:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Mia Tindall
I have returned this to a redirect to her mother's article. Mia is a 10-year-old child who is not notable in her own right; notability is not inherited. The fact that she has been seen publicly in what anyone can recognize as a family situation (e.g., her great-grandparents' funerals) does not make her notable. Please do not create biographical articles of non-notable minor children of notable parents. Risker (talk) 06:21, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- IT LOOKS LIKE I WAIT 20 WHOLE OTHER YEARS Qubacubazamniauser (talk) 08:54, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe longer. At this point, this child is the daughter of notable parents whose notability comes from their excellence in their chosen profession. The fact that her extended maternal family has a lot of very notable people is in no way a guarantee that she herself will become notable during her life. Risker (talk) 16:05, 27 April 2024 (UTC)